Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / GlamourFailure

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 22nd 2021 at 3:31:14 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Ambiguous Name, started by passivesmoking on Apr 7th 2012 at 8:05:22 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Maxaxle Scientific-ish PC Gamer Since: Jun, 2011
Scientific-ish PC Gamer
Feb 7th 2013 at 1:20:02 PM •••

I've noticed that most police cars, obvious or not, will have a "Police Interceptor" badge on the back, in addition to fairly distinctive hubcaps/wheels (the kind painted only in matte black, with the central feature in chrome). Would this make a good Real Life entry?

Edited by Maxaxle I have a signature!?
captainsandwich Since: Jan, 2012
May 16th 2012 at 9:26:05 PM •••

Should we mention that some observation technology, say a Single-lens reflex camera make use of mirrors? And if so should we mention how they use mirrors. Because my understanding is Single-lens reflex cameras use a mirror with a pent prism to allow the photographer to 'see through the lens'. And aside from helping the photographer know what what is going to be in the picture, has no impact on the result of the photo. I assume there is a type of camera that mirrors play a more active roll in, but i have no idea what it is called or how it would work.

Edited by captainsandwich
Goremand Since: Sep, 2010
Mar 28th 2012 at 4:37:02 PM •••

Since when is the ability to disguise oneself referred to as "glamour"? I thought glamour was just about being charming or beautiful.

Hide / Show Replies
CrypticMirror Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 28th 2012 at 5:14:16 PM •••

In historic myth, legend, and folklore the ability to cast a glamour is a means of disguise. The current usage of the words actually stems from that, since those disguises were often unnaturally beautiful, with it first being a spell that cloaked someone in beauty and then in the late 19th-early 20thC the magical part of it dropped out of common use to become the way it is commonly used today. However, in terms of fiction, it still holds true to the original spell cast to deceive with a disguise (ugly, plain, and beautiful). The Other Wiki has more info: here and here.

Edited by CrypticMirror
Goremand Since: Sep, 2010
Mar 29th 2012 at 7:25:02 AM •••

Huh. Thanks, that actually makes sense. Hey, aren't you one of the guys who tried to help me understand Death of The Author? Still don't quite get that one...

silveryrow Since: Feb, 2012
Feb 2nd 2012 at 8:48:02 AM •••

Buffy... Not sure that Adam seeing through Jonathan's spell counts, as it's not due to a feature that slips through or anything. Also, which vampire did she 'make out' with and not realise he was a vampire?

The folklore example with demons and vampires having bird feet they couldn't conceal - more Red Right Hand?

I'm not sure the Odin example should be there at all as he is 'usually unable' to hide his missing eye...

Edited by silveryrow
Top