Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / GambitPileUp

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 3:05:15 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: What is the rename? Thirty Gambit Pileup or, started by nuclearneo577 on May 27th 2011 at 12:33:38 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Candi Sorcerer in training Since: Aug, 2012
Sorcerer in training
Aug 8th 2013 at 9:46:51 PM •••

Checked on The Bloody Olive. It's a legitimate short film and belongs there, but the example needs expanding. (Along with others.)

Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving. -Terry Pratchett
Dreigonix Pending-Arrival Dragon Since: Oct, 2011
Pending-Arrival Dragon
Feb 14th 2012 at 2:02:43 PM •••

A Gambit Pileup can result from two ties in a row in Rock-Paper-Scissors: You tie first with Rock, then Paper, then you expect the opponent to use Scissors, so you'd use Rock, but your opponent would expect that and use Paper, but you would expect that and use Scissors, but your opponent would expect that and use Rock... It just goes on and on and on.

Let's let events play out as they will. What happens in WAOA stays in WAOA.
TwinBird Dunkies addict Since: Oct, 2009
Dunkies addict
Oct 4th 2011 at 1:29:47 PM •••

I'm a bit concerned about the entry about the war in Afghanistan; it seems a bit... pro-American. Just the second sentence, declaring the US as "the victim," al-Qaeda as "the attacker," and Iraqi Muslim extremists as "the wrongly accused" carries with it a whole host of controversial implications, plus the irrelevant apparent introduction of the Iraq war to a paragraph ostensibly concerning Afghanistan. Just to begin...

  1. The 9/11 attacks were unprovoked.
  2. al-Qaeda were in fact behind the 9/11 attacks.
  3. 9/11 was the primary causus belli, right or wrong, for Iraq.
  4. Conflating al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
  5. The US had the right to intervene.

The list goes on and on... and that's just that one sentence. It goes on to build on that theme, grated, not 100% Eagleland cheerleading, but I know if I were to say anything like that anywhere near an average college campus, everyone within earshot would be jumping down my throat instantly.

Edited by TwinBird My posts make considerably more sense read in the voice of John Ratzenberger. Hide / Show Replies
FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
Oct 15th 2011 at 10:08:42 PM •••

fixed.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
Top