Main Fille Fatale Discussion

collapse/expand topics
06:11:42 PM Feb 28th 2014
edited by
So a supposed leaked script for the upcoming Series/Gotham is said to feature a 14 year old Catwoman, that should be fun.
08:45:45 AM Nov 25th 2013
"Telling of Anne Rice's style that the only completely heterosexual character in her series' is seduced by a 13-year old."-I take it that means Mona herself has some Les Yay somewhere.
02:34:54 PM Jul 15th 2012
edited by MithrandirOlorin
Allot of example added here treat this like it means any Sexually active or horny young girl. It's supposed to be a Minor who serves the role of either The Femme Fatale or The Vamp. Or Both.
06:06:45 PM Apr 5th 2012
Okay, I'll go out on a limb here...this week, Australia's had the joy of having to hear about GOBS 2012 (here's the article to explain it, since the video itself is 1. Not Safe for Work and 2. constantly being removed: http://www.news.com.au/national/police-called-in-over-risque-video-shot-by-girls-from-an-adelaide-secondary-school/story-e6frfkvr-1226319326665 ). Would they sit in Fille Fatale or more along the lines of Troubling Unchildlike Behaviour ?
10:16:53 AM Jul 5th 2011
The Picture . . . is all wrong. A fille fatale is a seducer. What that shows is a precocious crush. She even saying that she wants to wait 'til legal. Not something a fille fatale thinks about.
05:17:30 PM Jul 15th 2012
edited by MithrandirOlorin
I'd agree the picture is an inappropriate example. But I don't consider actually being sexually active a requirement. The Adult equivalents of this, Femme Fatale and The Vamp, certainly don't always have sex or even guarantee it to to their victim. Being a Cock Tease can be just as dangerous.

Some of the people writing examples I see also forget that it's not required for the victim to be older. That's why there are so few, almost every Teen Drama has one of these, but some it seems won't count if their only seducing/using boys their own age.
10:25:33 AM Aug 15th 2012
The picture and the example related to it are being questioned again. Anyone want to weigh in?
03:24:16 AM Dec 22nd 2010
... So we're 'moral guardians' if we think it's actually wrong to subject children to oversexualised media and pornography? Seriously?
07:17:00 PM Dec 22nd 2010
02:36:09 PM Jul 15th 2012
The Moral Guardians want to depend on the Government to protect their children, rather then doing it themselves. I'm a Libertarian so I oppose all Censorship.
11:38:14 AM Feb 8th 2013
You are aware that not all children have parents who care about protecting them, right?
05:57:57 PM Feb 18th 2013
The government always fails.
07:24:45 PM Feb 23rd 2013
That I have to disagree on. However, they like us to stay as neutral as reasonably possible. Discussion and/or reference isn't the same as support.