What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics back to Main/DoingItFortHeart

doctrainAUM
topic
01:43:54 PM Mar 20th 2012
Surprisingly, the film North, uses this. Apparently, director Rob Reiner wanted to make a touching fable that would be his very own Wizard of Oz. What he failed to realize is that he made his own touching fable seven years before.

Granted, he may have considered it more of William Goldman's work. Just throwing out an idea as to how he could have wanting to go through with it.
Gatordile
topic
04:48:54 PM Jan 2nd 2011
The Homicide: Life On the Street example looks like a misplaced Needs More Love entry. If it does count, could someone who's actually seen the show fix it up a bit? I would, but I don't know anything about the series except the title.
nuclearneo577
topic
12:05:27 PM Dec 30th 2010
Why did the page say that it was subjective?
69.19.176.95
topic
03:27:32 PM Oct 5th 2010
I hate bringing this up, but can we please remove "Y'know what? Us." from real life examples? Please? It's not that I don't think TV Tropes is art, but it seems needlessly self-congratulatory, like "Oh yeah, we're so damn selfless and awesome". I'm also pretty sure that no everyone here is doing it for the art, that a lot of people just do it because they're bored, or think they have something funny or intersting to point out.

Also, I got the impression that TV Tropes had something of an "invisible hand" policy. No one arguing with eachother, no one using real-life examples on the main page, etc., like the pages just magically edited and updated themselves. I've seen several pages where Tropers have said used TV tropers as examples, and it makes me uncomfortable.
Larfleeze
12:18:38 PM Jan 2nd 2011
Art is subjective. Some see this as art.
Complet
topic
12:26:44 PM Aug 23rd 2010
This is all baseless speculation and an excuse to Gush About Creators You Like.
65.117.144.106
11:52:26 AM Sep 2nd 2010
Cutlist this trope then? :D
Marioguy128
09:55:32 AM Sep 6th 2010
No. There are plenty of tropes that are like this but negative. They have standards and so does this page.
Inkblot
topic
04:41:29 PM Apr 11th 2010
This really should be in Sugar Wiki.
SomeGuy
04:45:55 PM Apr 11th 2010
Explain your reasons. The definition looks value-neutral to me.
173.177.210.226
07:23:05 PM Jul 16th 2010
How about changing the trope's name to "Art For Art's Sake"? A friend told me that artists tend to use that phrase, quite a bit.
back to Main/DoingItFortHeart

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy