What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics back to Main/CutLexLuthorACheck

Luc
topic
08:40:14 PM Oct 19th 2010
The Yahtzee quote is a very good short summary of the trope; it's almost a better introduction to it than our description. The Agony Booth quote is a bit more concise, but it'd be a better target for quote removal, as it relies too much on Sarcasm Mode, and is thus harder for the first time reader to understand.
kyeo
topic
11:32:56 AM Mar 21st 2011
I really don't get the title. Who is cutting Luthor a check? And why? Is it what people would say if he was using his powers for good? Or are we cutting him a check in the hopes he'll stop being evil? Is it a quote from somewhere? I don't think it makes much sense, personally.
MrDeath
11:40:09 AM Mar 21st 2011
"Cutting a check" refers to the idea that the villains would make much more money just legally marketing their technology rather than using it to rob banks.

Though come to think of it, given that Luthor's modern interpretation is "richest dude in Metropolis" rather than "mad scientist," he might not be the best choice for a trope name.
aaeyero
08:34:52 AM May 21st 2011
I agree, the title doesn't make much sense. It sounds like it's a quote frome somewhere but isn't. Does anybody have any better ideas for a title?
ztyran
topic
08:49:33 AM Apr 19th 2011
There's an irony to calling this trope "Cut Lex Luthor A Check" as according to my research before the Corrupt Corporate Executive identity, he did patent many inventions under assumed names in order to fiance his revenge on Superman.
GordonSchumway
topic
07:10:45 PM Jul 10th 2011
Does anybody else think this trope is somewhat spurious in that it automatically assumes that the villain will actually succeed at making money off his inventions, whatever they are? Keep in mind that in Real Life many businesses tend to fail within their first year of operation, and that just because the villain has the scientific smarts to build some fancy machine doesn't necessarily mean he'll have the business sense to market it correctly. Not to mention that it can be a pain in the neck lining up potential investors for your invention, especially if it does something people would think is impossible.

It seems like the critics who complain about this trope are themselves assuming Step Three Profit by having the villain market his tech or skills legally, without considering all the hoops a villain would have to jump through to bring a product to market, much less make money off it.

Thoughts?
GreatLimmick
06:40:40 PM Jul 13th 2011
You have a good point.

Consider the Mr. Freeze from Batman The Animated Series. To my knowledge, he had already invented or laid the technical groundwork for all his villain gadgets before he got fired. Apparently, villainy really is his best shot at making money.
MarqFJA
09:13:21 PM Aug 5th 2011
edited by MarqFJA
Technically, he only got fired because his Corrupt Corporate Executive boss considered his desperate bid to save his terminally-sickly wife via experimental cryogenic tech "a waste of company resources", and ordered his men to pull the plug on the whole operation in spite of that being practically guaranteed to doom the cryogenized woman to (possibly slow and painful) death. If he had been working for Bruce Wayne's company, however....

Oh, and IIRC he only invented the cryogenic preservation technology at the time he had his Freak Lab "Accident"; the cryo-weaponry and cryo-suit came later.
back to Main/CutLexLuthorACheck

This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Privacy Policy