Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / AdaptationExplanationExtrication

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
CaptainCrawdad Since: Aug, 2009
Jan 20th 2012 at 10:00:08 AM •••

Removed:

  • In the Spider Man comics, Peter Parker builds webshooters, and puts them on his wrists, allowing him to aim them properly and activate them by using two of his fingers, giving rise to the famous hand motion associated with his webswinging. In the movie version the webshooters are an actual organic power. Why they come out of his wrists (instead of... another place) and why it requires the same finger motion is left unexplained. At the very least, though, it shows Peter having to figure out the motion on his own. One can assume (though this doesn't fix the 'missing explanation' part) that the hand motion flexes/relaxes a specific set of muscles in the wrist, thus allowing the webbing to be released and that, like the web-shooters' design, the exact finger position serves to prevent accidental release of webbing when he makes a fist or grabs something.

The film just changes why Spiderman needs to make that gesture. It doesn't lack explanation entirely.

Hide / Show Replies
NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Jan 12th 2016 at 4:09:43 AM •••

And why does he need it? Because... that's how web is being shot? Sorry but the movie never gave any kind of explanation on why that specific gesture is needed, for me it definitely qualifies as this.

MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Jan 12th 2016 at 8:00:33 AM •••

Why does it need to be explained? That's just how whatever muscle-group governs the webbing works now.

NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Apr 15th 2016 at 11:50:07 AM •••

Who said it needs explanation? Tropes Are Tools, if the explanation was never really needed in the first place and would get in the way of enjoyment, it's still this trope it's just used right.

tyrekecorrea Since: Jun, 2009
Jul 30th 2020 at 11:02:51 AM •••

I thought this trope was "Adaptation Extrication Explanation", a bit of writing in a work intended to compensate for an element being left out at an earlier point, for example, Lupin marrying Tonks and getting her pregnant was mentioned at a casual pace in the Harry Potter book series, but not at the same times in the films, leading to Tonks having almost no time to mention both the wedding and the pregnancy at the beginning of the seventh film and not getting all of the words out.

NNinja Since: Sep, 2015
Jan 6th 2016 at 10:47:19 AM •••

Threw these two from Lord of the rings movies.

  • No explanation is given in the films as to how Arwen gives up her immortality. In the books, she can do this because Elrond is half-human and so the Valar offered him and his children the choice to become human at any point.
Except that it's not true. first of all the choice was given to Earendil, his wife and sons(Elrond and Elros) and the choice couldn't be changed once it's made. Arwen was around 3000 years old by the time story ended, it's safe to assume she did make a choice to be an elf, if she could make it in the first place, second of all these two facts have nothing to do with each other because Luthien also gave up her immortality and she wasn't even remotely human.
  • The fight between the Orcs and Uruk-hai outside Fangorn. In the books this breaks out because Saruman and Sauron are not allies (as in the film), but rivals; the Uruk-hai, sent by Saruman, have orders to bring Merry and Pippin to Isengard, which the Orcs, sent by Sauron, have orders to bring them to the Ringwraiths. In the film, Saruman and Sauron are allies, and so the fight is reduced to a matter of simple insubordination; the Orcs are unwilling to accept their commanders' orders to leave the hobbits alive.
Orcs' insubordination is understandable explanation in it's own right, it's not gone, it's simply changed.

NaramSin Since: Jun, 2011
Jan 23rd 2013 at 7:23:33 AM •••

I know the Hound/Sansa pairing is rather popular but saying that he was "nothing but kind to her" in the TV show is not right. He laughed on her face when Cersei sent him to arrest her in S1 and he refused her gratitude for saving her from a bunch of rapists in S2, saying that he did it just because he likes to kill. Sansa had plenty of reasons to not trust the Hound in the TV show, even if they were not the same reasons as in the book.

Top