What's Happening

Troperville

Tools

collapse/expand topics back to Characters/SCPFoundation

Nithael
topic
04:46:19 AM Aug 19th 2013
The page has become too big and the folders don't work anymore, so we're gonna need to split it into several pages. I'm thinking about dividing it like this:
  • Foundation personnel
  • SC Ps #001-999
  • SC Ps #1000-1999
  • Groups of interest
  • Individuals of interest

Any other idea?
TheRoguePenguin
05:02:44 PM Aug 19th 2013
The SCPs are three times the size of the other categories, so the others only need the one page. SCP entries may require another split down the line.
Kuruni
topic
10:15:06 PM Aug 8th 2013
edited by 70.33.253.45
Alright people, I think it's time to clean this up. This characters sheet suffer badly from Zero-Context Example, Weblinks Are Not Examples and bad Handling Spoilers. At least, please add short description for each entry.
Ghostninja109
topic
12:37:31 PM Jun 9th 2013
Should we add the Daevite Empire to the Groups of Interest folder? Not everything about them can be covered by the entry for SCP-140.
Kuruni
topic
06:46:19 AM Jun 9th 2013
edited by 70.33.253.43
Do not bold tropes' name. As it's point-out in Bold Inflation, "it can irritate the reader and discredit the character".

Tropes themselves need no emphasis, if something's a very important, then it should be specify in description instead. And this sheet indeed has too much Zero-Context Example which should be fix.
Kuruni
topic
04:48:12 AM Feb 24th 2013
Just wonder...should we add Shark Punching Center to Groups of Interest section?
GhostOfAGeek
06:01:53 AM Feb 25th 2013
edited by GhostOfAGeek
I see no reason not to~ Though it should be mentioned that they're a joke group, unlike the other organizations and stuff. But then again, this exists, so....heh.
Voyd211
topic
04:11:01 PM Jan 25th 2013
Clef has just driven about half of the people reading things crazy. Seriously, ANOTHER Easter Egg somewhere in 231? That nobody's found yet?
GhostOfAGeek
05:26:50 AM Feb 22nd 2013
edited by GhostOfAGeek
Not really the place to be discussing this kind of thing, but HOLY CRAP I didn't know there were Easter Eggs there until confusion while reading this made me go back and find them. Holy crap. D:
Kuruni
topic
12:02:12 AM Jul 2nd 2012
I'm thinking about sorting entries in selected SCP section by their SCP numbers. On plus side, it would be easier to look for specific SCP as the number keep growing. On other hand, 173 and 682, which are pretty much poster boy SCP, won't be on the top anymore.

Any opinion?
Kuruni
08:21:01 AM Jul 19th 2012
No objection? Then I will start sorting...
Kuruni
08:40:21 PM Jul 19th 2012
Ok, what is the reason we keep this format in Select SCP section? It can be hard to fine specific SCP in that section, since they seem to placed in random order. At first, I though it's to keep 682 and Able on top of list, but with Iris being the first entry, there seem to be no point at all.
Kuruni
09:41:40 PM Jul 27th 2012
A week has passed, without single reply. So I will numerical sort it again.
Pig_catapult
topic
02:11:26 PM May 22nd 2012
I am confused. Some of the tropes on the "other SC Ps" section of the characters page are doubled on the main page, and I'm not seeing any rhyme or reason to it. Can we, like, merge or otherwise clean up this somehow?
Kuruni
11:26:34 PM May 22nd 2012
edited by Kuruni
True, the section serve no purpose since tropes for these SCPs should be on SCP Foundation instead.
Pig_catapult
01:56:27 PM May 23rd 2012
So, can I just go and merge that section back into the main page?
Kuruni
09:40:40 PM May 23rd 2012
edited by Kuruni
It should be. If some SCPs appear in three or more tropes, feel free to add them as new entries here.
GreatLimmick
topic
09:02:42 AM Mar 17th 2012
Does Prometheus Labs deserve a spot in the "Other Groups of Interest" section of the Characters page? As far as I can tell, they don't have any remaining facilities, but they did create or modify several SCP objects. Unfortunately, I don't have much to say about them...
Pig_catapult
topic
05:19:08 PM Jan 31st 2011
SCP-682 cannot do Mega Manning, so I removed the references to that. However, a lot of people DO seem to think that it can, so adding in something to reflect that the misconception exists might be a good idea, but I'm not sure which trope that would be. Flanderization? Common Knowledge?
115.147.38.55
topic
11:27:13 PM Mar 13th 2010
Are we allowed to include entries for when the SCP admin themselves wank/mary sue themselves in other games? I think it would be of note that your fave doctor may not be so awesome if you see how the creator takes it to a jerk-ass level in other places.
Clef
05:20:34 PM Mar 25th 2010
Question being, what's your motivation for doing so? If it's to attack the author, that seems. . . well, I don't think that's what TV Tropes is intended to be. Go to Encyclopedia Dramatica for that.
63.81.56.62
08:32:09 AM Jun 9th 2010
edited by DrMagnus
Agreed, author abuse is not appreciated. We know we're insane already.
MisterBibs
01:10:59 PM Jun 15th 2010
I put the thing back, but like I said in the edit line, I think I did it in such a way that didn't actively attack Bright.
back to Characters/SCPFoundation

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy