Nobody important here, Move along.
Talking About Jinx.
What is Jinx's actual body count? Her aim is always for fun, and her methods are always poperty damage and explosion, but did she actually slaughtered anyone at all before she enters league? (everyone knows champions always respawns)
As for now, Jinx's recorded crime include releasing animals in a zoo for chaos, simple vandalism, firearms discharge into air (strange, not people) at the city square, and causing the collapse of Piltover's treasury in a lengthy fight with Vi. Unlike Shaco, non of her crimes focuses on maiming people, in fact, while it's certain that people were getting panicked and wounded, whether or not someone actually died in the chaos is questionable.
Even though Riot Ransom did mentioned he thought jinx must have killed a lot of people, he was just playing "a man guessing things about Jinx, a mysterious, chaotic criminal" in the interview instead of a all-knowing creator.
So, maybe she actually dislike killing, and has a subtle constraint in her mayhems? Maybe she is not the kill-and-total-destruction-happy sociopathic maniac she always tries to appear as?
Even on Vi’s memo concerning her crimes, the words Vi used were “she doesn’t care who gets hurt”, without a single mention of anyone getting killed, and there are only “Panic among the people” “Chaos in the streets” and “Mayhem everywhere you look”, but no bodies, there are never any corpses running down the river or lying everywhere on the streets. In fact, Riot Ransom also mentioned that he think Jinx actually has a inner repressed desire for normalcy, which she always projects on her rocket launcher fishbones during her jokes, only to get promptly rejected by her usual, presenting self as a manic. So, lets dig on it, maybe she actually has a secret revulsion against putting end to lifes like most normal people do, but shes only acting the manic to herself and everyone else?
By thoughts, I might infiltrate the universe, and marvel upon enigmas of human society; yet in the end, I'm but the fool in front of a PC.
Not looking forward to rewriting Karma's entry. She is quite literally being removed from the game and replaced with an all-new champ, with new abilities, appearance and backstory. How much of the current entry should we preserve as "she used to be like this" notes and how much do we scrap?
Always expect the worst and you can only be pleasantly surprised. Hide / Show Replies
Tough choice, The troper in me says "Old karma is no longer in the game, so she isn't a character in league of legends and doesn't belong on the page." But that seems kinda extreme, there were people who really liked old Karma and played her a lot. Maybe make a hottip labeled "Old Karma" or something like that at the bottom of new Karma's entry?
...god, I don't even know where to begin...
Always expect the worst and you can only be pleasantly surprised.
I've moved Karma to a new folder in the T-Z section for all future reworks. Unfortunately, I'm no Karma player. And, rework or no rework, she's not an interesting Character to me, so my contributions beyond this point would be sub-par.
Cassiopeia champion was once a woman. She's the younger sister of Katarina , but never as deadly. What Cassiopeia lacked in killer instinct she made up with seductive guile. Her charm and elegance could extract even the direst of secrets from foreign dignitaries. But after betraying an oath of secrecy she took with her hand on a strange serpentine saber, Cassiopeia was transformed into the half-serpent form she has today. She hasn't lost her seductive powers, and the snake venom now flowing in her body gives her an upper hand in battle—overall, not a bad deal for Cassi if I may say so myself. click here for more information at - http://elohell.net/league-of-legends-champions/cassiopeia-guide
The League of Legends character pages have been rearranged per discussion in the LOL forum thread. Pages with excessive inbounds are being redirected.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman