• 4 Aug 19th, 2017 at 6:06PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 20th Aug, 2017 10:04:05 AM
    pgj1997, Realshow, and Sugarp1e1 are edit warring over whether to have emojis in the text to describe the characters or not. The characters page also has this issue.

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=WesternAnimation.TheEmojiMovie Reply

      A) They don't belong anywhere on the wiki unless it's a page where you should be posting the images, and B) This is ridiculous. Pgj 1997 seems to really pouring on the "cause I want to" reasoning over and over. He doesn't care about proper context, is effectively doing a "use image to create context" now, refusing to use proper words. This is also the second Edit War he started. It's not just the other users, who shouldn't be doing this, but this user is causing trouble more and more.

      I can't remember where it is at the moment, but somewhere there's something saying emojis and emoticons are Not Allowed on wiki pages. Forums are a different matter.

      That was Tips Worksheet and the edit tips. I've backed out the latest emoji restoring edit.

      For the work page of a movie focused on emojis, I think we should be willing to make an exception to the rule.... But that should take a dedicated discussion thread to decide. Said discussion is too long for an ATT thread.
  • 2 Aug 20th, 2017 at 1:01AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 20th Aug, 2017 03:41:59 AM
    Frozen's Funny, Heartwarming, Nightmare Fuel and Tearjerker pages all start with "Frozen is one funny film", "Frozen is one emotionally gruelling film". Isn't that non-kosher, or at least too nattery, since the examples themselves are what have to show that the movie is funny, etc.? Reply

      Repetitive but not natter.

      Lots of works have such phrases, and they are annoying to me too, but what the mod say goes first and foremost.
  • 2 Aug 19th, 2017 at 12:12PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 20th Aug, 2017 12:25:32 AM
    Episodes 37-52 in english, and according to the trivia page, There were also early episodes and "M's Again" which are also lost. Does anybody have any info on these Missing Episodes. Reply

      I'm not sure this is the page for this?

      Better try on the You Know That Show page.
  • 2 Aug 17th, 2017 at 2:02AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 17th Aug, 2017 11:51:23 AM
    From my post on the Natter Alert forum thread: ( http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=zybsujciv8eflkwsxjrf908h&page=58#1439 )

    "Analysis/RickAndMorty. After S03E04 was released, someone attempted to write a summation of what the writers did wrong, and, well, These Tropers got involved, and the whole thing seems to be closer to a bitter forum thread than to an essay."

    In retrospect, I'd remove everything on that page, as even the original post is written in first person. Do you think that page has something worth preserving? Reply

      Seems they would do better in a forum topic. That stuff's not what Analysis is for. I'll cut it with an appropriate message.

      That's what I thought, too. Looks like a blog post and complaining.
  • 1 Aug 13th, 2017 at 10:10PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 13th Aug, 2017 11:33:15 PM
    jonathan-sherwin recently added some contesting natter to DethroningMoment.Western Animation A To J (which I removed) that might also be considered rude. Reply

      It is rude and I've warned them for it.
  • 5 Aug 13th, 2017 at 4:04PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 13th Aug, 2017 09:13:06 PM
    There's a troper by the name of Smitty 91 who keeps going by different usernames and posting different entries in FiM's DMoS page. It's obvious he hates the show now, but good lord, this person is persistent. I've actually been asked about his latest entry on "Fame and Misfortune" (an episode that I, myself, hate for totally different reasons than mostly everyone else), which has since been removed, and I figured I'd let you know about this. This guy needs to stop. It is my request that this person be penalized for his continued misuse of the page. Reply

      Link to the relevant page's history and the edit history of the troper in question, which is nothing but edits to DethroningMoment.My Little Pony Friendship Is Magic, and one for DethroningMoment.The Mysterious Mr Enter.

      Two questions spring to mind:

      1. How do you know all these different usernames are the same person?

      2. Are all the different usernames a result of ban evasion or does they just hate the show that much they'll abuse the one entry per show per troper rule?

      Edit: Ah, okay, I think I see. The editing is all under Smitty, but the entries are all under different names?

      While I do massively agree and so on with you and you did great in coming to tell us... you cant request a troper be banned or suspended. Even with that polite wording you used.

      There's a thread in the discussion page that states that this person was doing it back in May.

      It appears that another moderator has suspended the user.

      Senor asked that he be 'penalized'. A bit harsh, but not a specific request for a EBS thread trip. :p

      Senor, in the future, asking for a 'tap on the shoulder' is sufficient. It directs the mods' attention without requesting a specific action, discipline or otherwise.
  • 1 Aug 12th, 2017 at 11:11AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 12th Aug, 2017 05:19:49 PM
    This page of Teen Titans Go!, unsurprisingly has a lot of complaining in it. I was gonna clean it myself, but I can't even tell what examples should remain at this point. Reply

      For starters, anything that's flat out whining can be edited down or nuked, depending on how bad it is.

      You can put examples you aren't sure about on the discussion page.
  • 7 Aug 5th, 2017 at 10:10PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 7th Aug, 2017 02:07:51 PM
    Moana: The split-second appearance of Sven has been added and then deleted at least 4 times as a / to "Cameo" example. The adding of the example was done by 4 different Tropers, the deleting of the example was done multiple times by rva98014, edit reason that it's more a Mythology Gag (where it's already mentioned) than Cameo, and a Freeze-Frame Bonus. I actually agree with rva that the Sven appearance is way too short to count as a Cameo. However, since so many Tropers seem to count this as Cameo and keep re-adding the example, and we don't want an endless add-delete-add-delete....... cycle, I thought it's probably better to discuss whether the Sven appearance counts as a Cameo or not, and reach consensus, and then add a comment to the page whether this counts as an example or not (similar to like the Frozen page has a comment to the page to not add any Big Bad). So, comments on whether Sven would qualify for Cameo?

    EDIT: sent a P.M. to both harmonicsonic and rva98014 (Tropers who did the last add and last delete) to join this discussion. Reply

      There does seem to be confusion over the distinction between tropes like The Cameo, Shout-Out, and Mythology Gag as they all can involve a nod to familiar characters. In the case of Sven it seems rather straightforward to me that an appearance that lasts a fraction of second and requires freeze-framing to verify should not be considered a cameo.

      The definition of cameo is "A brief appearance by a well-known star or other famous person in a role that would otherwise be an extra or walk-on." Even if you want to stretch the definition of "brief" to be a fraction of second, it still doesn't qualify as a cameo because it's not the actual character of Sven from Frozen. It's Maui shape-shifting into the form of "Sven" as he is undergoing his Magic Misfire. As such it's a nod-and-wink to the audience (hence why it's a better fit as a Disney Mythology Gag) but it's not really an appearance of Sven the character.

      Ideally, we should add a discussion item on the Moana page itself that documents the consensus we achieve here and then we should include some kind of comment in the source code to alert future tropers not to include a Sven example under The Cameo and reference the discussion item so the troper can read it for more details.

      It's easy to spot, so I'd say no, it's not quite a Freeze-Frame Bonus, but I'm still stuck on cameos.

      Why? Because throughout Disney animated history you find characters from other films making short appearances for the sake of it, and they're pretty much all called cameos. It's dubbed a Mythology Gag when there's a toy of Nemo in Boo's room in Monster's Inc. In order to determine if Sven's a cameo, we should determine if the appearance of Sven really counts as Sven, or just one of Maui's fluctuating disguises that looks like Sven.

      I'm edging towards believing it is Sven, and so a cameo, because any animal image could have taken that spot, but it was a deliberate design effort to put a character from another film into the Moana canon.

      I'm inclined to think that a character who looks exactly like Sven but explicitly isn't actually Sven shouldn't count as a cameo by Sven. If it was a case of "cameo" being the only option to note the reference, I'd be more lenient, but when there are two entirely uncontroversial ways to note that the film contains an appearance by Sven's image, do we really need to argue about including a third?

      If it's not intended to be the same character, and it's just a case of the animators not wanting to go through the trouble of designing a split-second-appearing character, maybe it'd count as a Reused Character Design instead?

      It's probably intentional. But to me the example reads like if Sven's likeness is used, not Sven himself. That is, the other character looks like Sven for a moment, but doesn't become Sven. I don't think that counts as a cameo.

      "Sven's likeness is used, not Sven himself"

      This ^.

      We know it's still Maui, no matter what he looks like, so it cannot be Sven himself. That makes it a very weak case to call "Cameo".

      Before the discussion continues too much further into the evaluation of Sven as cameo, let me add some context. A few months ago, the Moana pages were in need of a good housecleaning. There were a lot of redundant entries, story tropes on the character pages, and examples that didn't fit the details of the trope.

      As, I and few others starting cleaning up, we found many duplicate entries in the Cameo, Shout-Out and Mythology Gag sections. Some had the same example in all three categories, others had the same example in just two. Take the Sven example, it technically qualifies for each category, a Cameo (as his character model appears in the film), a Shout-Out to Frozen, and a Disney Mythology Gag as an easter egg. The issue was that it added clutter and redundancy to the page without adding much value. Each entry basically said "hey Maui turns into Sven for a second".

      In cleaning up, we utilized a basic rule of thumb we had adopted on the Zootopia pages to help organize references in a Disney movie since it tends to have so many hidden mickeys, easter eggs, in-jokes, etc. So, if the reference was purely Disney, be it a "cameo", image, line from a movie, etc, it was collected under Mythology Gag. If it was a reference outside of the Disney mythos, it went under shout-out. If it was an unambiguous cameo it went there.

      Moana has relevant examples of each category. It has an intentional Godzilla cameo confirmed by the creative team. The Kakamora are an intentional Shout-Out to Mad Max: Fury Road, and it has plenty of Disney Mythology gags.

      I'm going to open a discussion item over on the Moana pages inviting comment to this organizing convention as see if the community there wants to adopt it. If so, then the discussion here becomes moot because even if Sven could qualify as a cameo, it's best represented as a nod-and-wink Disney Mythology Gag.
  • 3 Jul 28th, 2017 at 2:02AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 28th Jul, 2017 07:37:15 PM
    The cutting reason says we cut "So Bad, It's Horrible", it seems to be back for quite a while now. Maybe re-add all the subpages that are missing since its readdition? Reply

      I don't think we actually did cut the So Bad, It's Horrible trope. There was a vote on whether it should be cut ages ago, but there were more nays than yeas.

      Second of all, if a SBIH subpage is cut, they are likely sent to the Permanent Red Link Club. You can tell if they were if there's a lock beside "Edit page". However, Horrible.Eastern Animation isn't permalocked or in PRLC, so if you wish to create that, then be sure whichever examples you want to add fit the criteria. Otherwise, it will be cut right away.

      You can use the Wayback Machine to find the old page, too, if you need to readd everything.

      @Berrenta: Can't think of any examples... The only things I know are classics like "Nu, Pogodi!" "Masha and the Bear", etc.
  • 2 Jul 24th, 2017 at 8:08AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 24th Jul, 2017 08:58:44 AM
    Okay I remember watching this show I think it's from late 2000's. And it centred around this kid in a wheelchair who has glasses. Then one day he finds this green stone that gives him telekinetic powers I think. And apparently there's like 100 of these stones in the world and they need to stop them from getting into the wrong hands and blah blah blah. And the bad guy like travels through time uncontrollably and finding different stones and gaining new powers. Reply
  • 2 Jul 21st, 2017 at 6:06AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 21st Jul, 2017 12:29:25 PM
    can you guys get rid of season 9 on adventure time because its still in season 8 and the episodes like whispers and three buckets are season 8 episodes Reply

      Um no?

      Umm...I believe they are on season 9.
  • 5 Jul 19th, 2017 at 5:05PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 20th Jul, 2017 03:16:21 PM
    Just found JustForFun.Daring Do and it's got just about every subpage out there. I thought non-existent works were supposed to stay in their namespace... I know this is true for Darth Wiki, the other repository for non-existent works but I'm not sure about Just for Fun, so I figured I'd ask. Reply

      There is a collection of books on Amazon titled "My Little Pony: The Adventures of Daring Do" by A.K. Yearling and G.M. Berrow (with 95 customer reviews). Weird that there's a Just for Fun/ page but not a Literature/ one...

      Probably because the Just for Fun page is made up of imagined stories for a Show Within a Show book series. Meanwhile The Daring Do Adventure Collection is an officially licensed and published take on the same series.

      Umm... if someone's using the JFF namespace to create articles for imaginary works, then those need to be cut and burned ASAP.

      Edit: Well, we do allow some things like that, such as Show Within a Show works like "The Ugly Barnacle". But if this is just a collection of random fan ideas with no internal or external reality, then they don't belong.

      ^ As far as I understand, Daring Doo is a Show Within a Show (that was apparently later defictionalized).

      I don't know if it's a good thing, particularly, but using Just for Fun to treat Show Within a Show works as if they actually existed seems like it's been a thing for a long time now.
  • 1 Jul 17th, 2017 at 5:05PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 17th Jul, 2017 05:25:24 PM
    Mickey Mouse Fan 12345 has removed examples from Awesome.The Book Of Life, The Book of Life and The Book of Life, just because they disagreed with those entries. Reply

      Reverted and sent notifiers for deleting YMMV.
  • 1 Jul 9th, 2017 at 8:08AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 9th Jul, 2017 02:35:23 PM
    Has anyone ever heard of the animated X-Men adaptation called Wolverine and the X-Men? Well, if you have, then you should know that I have created a character page for the series and I need assistance with providing more tropes for the other characters that have appeared in the series.

    Specifically, I need assistance with including more tropes for the members of the Future X-Men (which consists of Professor Xavier, Bishop, Berzerker, Future Domino, Hellion, Kamal, Marrow, Future Lorna Dane Rover The Sentinel, Vanisher, Future Wolverine, and X-23), The Brotherhood of Mutants (which consists of Avalanche, Blob, Domino, Quicksilver, Rogue, and Toad) , The Acolytes (which consists of Magneto, Mystique, Scarlet Witch, Polaris, Scanner, Mellencamp, Senyaka, Kleinstock Brothers, Pyro, Blink, Mercury, and Juggernaut) , the MRD (which consists of Mister Sinister, Arclight, Archangel, Blockbuster, Harpoon, Multiple Man, Vertigo), The Inner Circle (which consists of Sebastian Shaw, Donald Pierce, Harry Leland, Selene, [[Spoiler:Emma Frost]], and the Stepford Cuckoos), The MRD (which consists of Senator Kelly, Warren Worthington II, Bolivar Trask, The Sentinels, The Prowlers, Master Mold, Dr. Sybil Zane, Colonel Moss, Dr. Kavita Rao, Agent Haskett, and Dr. Peterson), Weapon X (which consists of Professor Thorton, Dr. Abraham Cornelius, Sabretooth, Maverick, Mystique, X-23, and Wolverine), Other mutants (which consists of Apocalypse, Big Bertha, Boom Boom, Christy Nord, Darwin, Dazzler, Dust, Feral, Fever Pitch, Firestar, Gambit, Magma, Network, Nitro, Pixie, Psylocke, Quill, Rockslide, Sauron, Shadow King, Shatter, Silver Samurai, Squidboy, Thunderbird, Tildie Soames, DJ, Washout, Trance, M-Twins, M, and Synch), and the other characters (which consists of Mojo, Spiral, The Reavers, Nick Fury, Hulk, Wendigo, and Mariko Yashida).

    I understand that the series had Loads and Loads of Characters, but we just have to cooperate and the character page for this series will be just as great as some of the other character that are for other programs (specifically the character pages of Ben 10, the adaptations that are set in the DC Animated Universe, and The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes!).

    Are there any users that are willing to assist me with this important task? Reply

      I recommend asking on the forums.
  • 3 Jul 7th, 2017 at 4:04PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 9th Jul, 2017 01:15:47 AM
    On CreatorsPet.Western Animation, Unknownlight deleted the entry on Starlight Glimmer from My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic, leaving the following edit reason:

    "Starlight doesn't fit any of the criteria, let alone all of them. The easiest most objective one to debunk is "hated by the fans": https://www.equestriadaily.com/2017/01/poll-results-which-main-character.html"

    Teras Ode has re-added the example with the following edit reason:

    "(1) That poll is very old. 2) It shows only half of that sites voters think she's awesome and it's been noted many times in various MLP sections on this site that while Starlight isn't outright The Scrappy in the sense that she's hated by absolutely everyone, she's enough of a Base Breaker that roughly half of the fandom doesn't like her and there's always been a big fuss when something controversial happens around her. There hasn't been a word for word statement that she's indeed the Creator's Favorite but as for Character Focus and Character Shilling, there's plenty of examples of characters praising her among other things that have been noted on episode recaps and also instances of her being Spotlight-Stealing Squad."

    Bear in mind that the general consensus on the Creator's Pet Clean-Up thread was that the character didn't qualify and the example should have been removed. Reply

      If the thread here says she doesn't qualify, that's what matters. It needs to be removed again (link to the thread in the edit reason) and the person who added it back needs to be messaged.

      Teras Ode has been messaged, and directed to the appropriate thread.

      I noticed Perdonyx and JJHIL 325 doing similar edits. I doubt it, but they aren't the same person, are they?

      Considering JJHIL 325 added more stuff before Teras Ode came to the thread, I want to be sure. Their edit histories seem different, but I don't know if it's just a sockpuppet or people who are all on a crusade.
  • 1 Jul 7th, 2017 at 11:11AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 7th Jul, 2017 12:17:20 PM
    Why does YMMV.Tom And Jerry Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory say it needs to go on an index, when most YMMV pages don't have indices? I initially thought it had the wrong Page Type, but it doesn't look like the case. Reply

      It is in the wrong namespace. It's in 'Ymmv' instead of 'YMMV'.

      The capitalization is causing the problem. To fix it, copy all the content to a sandbox page (Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory), cut the original Ymmv page, and remake it with the proper capitalization.
  • 8 Jul 6th, 2017 at 12:12PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 7th Jul, 2017 07:27:49 AM
    There is a problem with Film.Star Wars The Clone Wars. It is using the Film/ despite being an animated movie, which is incorrect. However, WesternAnimation.Star Wars The Clone Wars is already taken by the page for the whole TV series (of which this movie is considered a pilot).

    In such a case, my guess would be to use the Recap/ namespace, and rename this page something like "Star Wars: The Clone Wars (Movie)" Reply

      Why don't we have an Animated Film namespace, again?

      To be frank, it's one of those arbitrary decisions that only makes sense when you consider that the wiki, including the namespace system, has grown organically rather than out of any sort of concentrated administrative effort. For example, if we're really focused on medium as an organizational principle, then having both animated films and animated series go under Western Animation, while Anime is a distinct namespace, is insane. But changing it now would be all but impossible. So we deal.

      Moving the work to Western Animation/ Star Wars: The Clone Wars (Movie) makes about as much sense as anything.

      The WesternAnimation/ page concerns both the TV series and movie. That's why the current Film/ corresponds more to an episode page, hence why I suggested Recap/ as namespace.

      I'm more of the 'move everything about the animated movie to a page separate from the either the live-action films or animated series' mind, since it's a separate work from either. But whatever works.

      I wouldn't use Recap, since technically the TCW movie and the animated series are distinct works. Recap is a type of work subpage that wouldn't apply in this case.

      Well, the WesternAnimation/ page does specify that "The theatrical film had originally begun as a four-part-opening arc for the series but was converted into a Compilation Movie after Lucas screened the episodes himself." So the two being distinct works is arguable.

      Although there are cases where a season / part of a work has received its own page under the same namespace (like Series.Torchwood Miracle Day or WesternAnimation.Archer Dreamland, so there is precedent for this too.

      I mean, if there's general agreement that they're all one work in practice, then fine, do it that way.
  • 2 Jul 4th, 2017 at 9:09PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 5th Jul, 2017 07:02:01 AM
    On both Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa and Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted, snoopybrown 1987 added information talking about the films' critical reception and box-office take, I deleted those and left the following as edit reason:

    How to Create a Works Page: "Things not to include: quality judgements (don't say how much it sucked/how awesome it was), critical reception (that's just a specific variant of quality judgements), recommendations (don't tell us whether or not we should check it out)"

    Since then they have re-added them back. Reply

      Have they been messaged saying we don't document that stuff?

      Suspended them. Please re-remove those edits.
  • 4 Jun 29th, 2017 at 3:03PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 1st Jul, 2017 05:09:15 AM
    In the category "weird use of namespaces", I just found the Dreamland.Archer page. Apparently, Archer Dreamland is a New Season, New Name for the season 8 of Archer. Now, even if it deserves its own page, I guess it should be WesternAnimation.Archer Dreamland. Delete, or move? Reply

      I think that ought to be moved. The auto-disambig can catch people looking for Archer stuff, and a link to the correct page can be put in the cut reason...

      And that kind of random use of namespaces is exactly what the current project thread is trying to get rid of!

      Aye, move that.

      It's moved, de-wicked and cutlisted.
  • 1 Jun 25th, 2017 at 2:02PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 25th Jun, 2017 03:57:40 PM
    Steven Universe S 3 E 20 Bismuth has a "Hate Dumb" entry despite the page itself specifically saying not to put them on a work's page. Reply

      I've sent a message to the user who added it. The example has already been removed by a different troper.
  • 1 Jun 20th, 2017 at 10:10PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 21st Jun, 2017 04:52:33 AM
    Hey, Tropers, I need help.

    I have been thinking about a cartoon that I remember watching once as a young child. This would place the show around the early 2000's or so. I have only seen one episode to my knowledge so my memory is a bit limited.

    The cartoon revokes around this kid who is a prankster and is always getting into trouble. He is friends with a nerdy, minority (Hispanic?) kid who helps him out. The main character, is generally just really douchey and annoying and tries to get the attention of this girl who is annoyed by his hijinks. I also remember an older character who was generally a bad influence on the main character and his friend.

    The episode I remember seemed to revolve around people loosing there pants or something. Like, the main character accidentally looses his pants so he comes up with the idea of depantsing everyone in the entire school.

    The show may have been foreign. Canadian probably. Seemed to be marketed towards kids in there late childhood years or early teens perhaps. Reply

      If you're trying to ask tropers for help, marking the topic Private isn't going to do any good. Second, you want You Know That Show.
  • 1 Jun 19th, 2017 at 6:06PM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 20th Jun, 2017 04:49:02 AM
    A troper named katnissfire has removed almost all of fluffything's entries in the DethroningMoment.Western Animation for different works, citing that he added multiple moments in one page, never mind the fact that katnissfire has completely misred the rules where it says one moment per work, not one moment per page

    Edit: Woops looks like I mistyped the link Reply

      Suspended and reverted.
  • 1 Jun 11th, 2017 at 5:05AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 11th Jun, 2017 05:36:10 AM
    hello friends i have been looking for the name of an old cartoon that had kids use their phone to go from the real world to some kind of digital world to a monster world where they can take a pic of a monster/item there and the can turn/use the things they took a pic in battle in the digital world, there were 3 main characters I remember a guy with black hair and a girl I don't remember the last one I think he was a fat guy the black hair dude loved to turn into this green monster. if anyone know the name of or at least remember the name of a major character plz help thank you Reply
  • 1 Jun 8th, 2017 at 1:01AM
    Western Animation
    Lastest Reply: 8th Jun, 2017 01:18:01 AM
    I dont remember the show but in the show there is a kid he draw a creature on a page and name it frog and show it to his grandpa then i don't remember what happen but he go into another dimension where he was been attacked but suddenly one girl she ware pink and one boy who ware green shirt they take out there gems out of there pockets and call there creatures and save the boy he also have a blue crystal please tell me the name of show Reply

      You should ask in You Know That Show. I also suggest you use better grammar so people can better tell what you're talking about.
  • 0 Jun 2nd, 2017 at 7:07AM
    Western Animation
    I noticed that there are some duplicate pages in the Sugar Wiki for Steven Universe. For example the Awesome page has the examples in the various folder, but also all these pages without an index. Probably someone, starting from the Funny page, has created them without finishing the job.. Reply
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?type=att&status=all&sort=activity&f=Western%20Animation