Follow TV Tropes

Following

The sky-high aircraft and aviation thread

Go To

TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#14751: Jun 28th 2016 at 9:43:31 PM

We blinked and the future is now.

Who watches the watchmen?
AngelusNox The law in the night from somewhere around nothing Since: Dec, 2014 Relationship Status: Married to the job
The law in the night
#14752: Jun 28th 2016 at 10:00:55 PM

I need to find where I read about Lockheed projects to turn the F-18 Super Hornet and the F-35 into drones.

Inter arma enim silent leges
AFP Since: Mar, 2010
#14753: Jun 28th 2016 at 10:06:21 PM

Oh man, Stealth, that film was bad. [lol]

It was worse if you had a firm understanding of geography.

edited 28th Jun '16 10:06:37 PM by AFP

TamH70 Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#14754: Jun 29th 2016 at 3:44:22 AM

Thanks for the kind thoughts, Tuffers. [lol]

Obligatory:

On a more serious note, I think the squishy human's going to be in the cockpit for a while yet, probably too much of a while as far as sheer utility in terms of combat effectiveness goes.

MajorTom Eye'm the cutest! Since: Dec, 2009 Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Eye'm the cutest!
#14755: Jun 29th 2016 at 4:58:45 AM

Oh damn. I can't wait for those droni-fied F-16s and the like to show up at Red Flag or some similar exercise and give the hotshot pilots a shock. Outmaneuver this...

And then the Fighter Mafia will gang up on it and have it outlawed or otherwise prohibited from ever seeing service. The ENTIRE world's Fighter Mafia.

"Allah may guide their bullets, but Jesus helps those who aim down the sights."
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
AngelusNox The law in the night from somewhere around nothing Since: Dec, 2014 Relationship Status: Married to the job
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#14759: Jul 3rd 2016 at 4:26:56 AM

Sharing secret F-35 data gives USAF new problem

The Lockheed Martin’s F-35’s newest snag doesn’t come from a technological issue, but an international policy problem, according to the director of the US Air Force’s F-35A Integration Office.

In order for the aircraft to become fully operational across the nine partner nations and three foreign military sales customers participating in the program, the F-35 must be able to share data in a cloud-based architecture, Maj. Gen. Jeff Harrigian said at an Air Force Association event Thursday. These mission data files, which are meant to be common across the US services and its allies, allow aircrews to make critical decisions, including identifying friend or foe.

But sovereignty issues and concerns over where data comes from have hindered that flow of information among international partners, he said. That lack of a common operating picture has become a sticking point for the program, one that even the Air Force’s chief of Air Combat Command, Gen. Herbert Carlisle, has pointed to as a significant issue, according to Harrigian.

“What will be critically important going forward is how we get data off this airplane, and it’s something that we’ve struggled with,” Harrigian said. “I will tell you Gen. Carlisle put his finger in my chest and said we’ve got to figure this out.”

The ability to accurately identify weapons, adversaries and friendly forces will rely on coherent data sharing, US Air Force Col. Max Marosko, deputy director of air and cyberspace operations for Pacific Air Forces, said Thursday. Without synchronized mission data files, allied forces may not see the same picture in the sky and be able to make a decision.

“Given an example of Brit F-35s in one lane and US F35s in another lane, if our databases aren’t synchronized you’re going to end up with conflicting identification using, which could delay employment and put the force at more risk,” he said. “We can ensure we’re all on the same playing field and we don’t have any identification problems that could most likely lead to a lack of shooting and putting the pilots at more risk. That’s an important thing to consider.”


Airbus to test automatic boom mode for A330 MRTT

With its advanced boom refuelling system for the A330 multi-role tanker transport (MRTT) having achieved full operational capability, Airbus Defence & Space has turned its attention to trialling an automatic mode for the fly-by-wire controlled structure.

“We have finalised all of the activities in the simulator, and have already had some flight trials, without contact [with a Lockheed Martin F-16],” says head of engineering Miguel Angel Morrell. “The next step is to do the contact,” he adds. This activity – to be performed using the company’s A310 MRTT demonstrator – is expected to occur around the end of 2016. If these trials are successful, the company will advance to operating the system in fully automatic mode.

Operation of the boom is currently a manual task performed by a qualified “boomer”, but the technology being trialled involves the use of real-time video and image processing to track a receiver aircraft’s exact position.

Under the Airbus concept, the operator will control the boom manually – including commanding its extension – until it has been positioned within a required area, close to the receiver aircraft. At this point, its automatic mode would be engaged to complete the contact procedure.

“Once in contact it’s hands-free to operate, until manual disconnect,” Morrell says.

Airbus says use of such an automatic capability would result in “improvements in operational and safety aspects” of air-to-air refuelling, and also save time during the process.

Existing A330 MRTT operator the Royal Australian Air Force has already expressed interest in the enhancement, Morrell says, although the operator does not yet have a firm requirement to field such an advance.

edited 3rd Jul '16 4:30:34 AM by Greenmantle

Keep Rolling On
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14760: Jul 6th 2016 at 3:31:22 AM

News incoming on Egypt Air flight 804!

Apparently, the black boxes indicate there was a fire in the cockpit before the crash, per several different sources on Wikipedia.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Imca (Veteran)
#14761: Jul 6th 2016 at 4:58:05 AM

So a confirmation of what the diagnostic system reported?

The de-icing unit in the right cockpit window caught on fire?

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#14763: Jul 6th 2016 at 10:09:56 AM

It's here: RAF reveals VIP-configured Voyager

The Royal Air Force’s VIP-roled Airbus Defence & Space A330 Voyager has been revealed ahead of its first deployment – transporting the UK defence secretary Michael Fallon to a NATO summit in Warsaw on 8 July.

The specially adapted Voyager (ZZ336) has been configured with 58 business-class seats, rather than the usual 291 economy seats.

Announced as part of the UK government's Strategic Defence and Security Review in November 2015, the modification is claimed to be “significantly cheaper” than chartering flights for government officials or the royal family.

It will still be able to function as a tanker, and will reside at RAF Brize Norton alongside the rest of the Voyager fleet. The VIP configuration will be able to be fitted to any of the other A330s in the RAF inventory, should ZZ336 be out of service.

“The refitting of this RAF Voyager – to transform it from a standard air-to-air refuelling and air transport to an aircraft suitable for the additional role of VIP transport – was completed quickly and efficiently with our AirTanker partners,” says Air Marshal Sean Reynolds, deputy commander of capability for the air force. “The reconfigured Voyager flying on its maiden VIP flight on Friday will proudly represent the UK and the RAF across the globe for many years to come.”

The service has so far received 13 of an eventual 14 aircraft under the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft (FSTA) contract, with the final delivery expected later this month. Nine Voyagers are part of the core fleet, while the remainder are “surge” aircraft that can be leased for other roles such as civilian passenger transport.

Aircraft number 13 was converted into a civilian configuration after its February delivery, and the final aircraft from the contract will receive the same modification.

It doesn't sound quite the lap of luxury, just more of the same with better seating.


Pilatus delivers 1,400th PC-12

Pilatus has delivered its 1,400th PC-12, around 22 years after the first example of the single-engined turboprop entered service.

The all-metal PC-12NG was handed over on 27 May to an unnamed US customer. This example is the third iteration of the 10-seat aircraft, introduced by the Swiss airframer in January. Priced at $4.9 million, this latest NG features better take-off and climb performance, more cabin comfort, greater range and speed and a quieter cabin.

Since the NG’s introduction in 2008, more than 630 units have been shipped, and the fleet has accumulated more than one million flying hours, says Pilatus. The entire PC-12 fleet, however, has amassed 5.6 million flight hours, it adds.

Annual deliveries of the Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-powered type have remained consistently strong over the last decade, hitting a record 100 units in 2009, according to statistics from the General Aviation Manufacturers Association. The market remains buoyant: in the first quarter of 2016, Pilatus shipped 16 aircraft, compared with seven during the same period last year, it reports.

The majority of PC-12s have been sold in a passenger transportation role, with private, corporate, charter and fractional operators making up the bulk of its customers.

Ignaz Gretener, vice-president of Pilatus’s general aviation division, describes the handover as an “exciting milestone”.

“While much attention has recently been focused on the new PC-24 jet,” he says, “the PC-12 is still the backbone of our general aviation business.”

Launched in 2013, the PC-24 is Pilatus’s first foray into the business jet market. The superlight twin is scheduled for certification and service entry in 2017.

edited 6th Jul '16 2:18:26 PM by Greenmantle

Keep Rolling On
TuefelHundenIV Night Clerk of the Apacalypse. from Doomsday Facility Corner Store. Since: Aug, 2009 Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Night Clerk of the Apacalypse.
#14764: Jul 6th 2016 at 5:27:12 PM

Drone tour of quarry From the sounds and how fast it is going it may one of those quad rotor racing drones in the video. Add in you can see the pilot who appears to be wearing the VR head set used to help navigate the drone.

Articles from last Year

The US Special Forces multi-role drone The MMIST CQ-10 Snowgoose. It can haul up to 600 lbs at 100lbs it has longer range and up to 15 hours of loiter time. There is even an Auto-Gyro version that is even more capable and flexible in launch. The Parasail version can be launched off of a Humvee or dropped out of a cargo craft.

DARPA's self destroying UAV Glider The idea being the glider is guided to its target location and after the materials are extracted it starts to break down removing the need to pack the device out. This would be ideal for delivering supplies to remote locations in both military and aide operations. It is supposedly going to utilize technology used in self destructing chips.

Who watches the watchmen?
TamH70 Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#14765: Jul 9th 2016 at 8:41:51 AM

Looks like this Delta crew needed to go to Specsavers. tongue

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/delta-passenger-jet-accidentally-lands-at-a-military-air-base-in-south-dakota/ar-BBu7DSm?ocid=spartandhp

I'm actually surprised they let the jet land. For all they knew it could have been another hijacked civvy jet with a crew planning on crashing into something rather expensive.

Still, it seems like the half bird Colonel in charge of the base wasn't too pleased with the idiots once they finally landed.

"This was a gross breach of the security of our Airfield that present[ed] a potential threat to both our Airmen and our resources.

"Incidents like this occur when pilots fail to execute the basic measures of airmanship." Snerks.

Imca (Veteran)
#14766: Jul 9th 2016 at 8:57:10 AM

A) HOW.

B) Did they get fired?

Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#14767: Jul 9th 2016 at 9:01:31 AM

[up] How? Rather simple really — it appears that the airport that the Delta A320 was supposed to land at (Rapid City Airport) is nearby and the runways are on a similar orientation to Ellesworth AFB.

Similar events to this have happened in the past. Of course, aircraft landing at the wrong airfield isn't limited to civilian aircraft...

edited 9th Jul '16 9:05:14 AM by Greenmantle

Keep Rolling On
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14768: Jul 9th 2016 at 9:05:10 AM

Landing at the wrong airport/runway is a moderately frequent occurrence. The pilots will keep their job until the investigation is over, I think.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
AFP Since: Mar, 2010
#14769: Jul 9th 2016 at 6:35:13 PM

Runways are oriented usually based on prevailing wind conditions, so any given airport in a region will probably have the runways pointing the same way. Some places the airports are fairly close together. A couple of years back, a C-17 accidentally landed at Jabara Airport instead of Mc Connell AFB in Wichita, KS. The media had a field day going on about how this was a heavy airlifter and Jabara's runway was much shorter than the runway the plane was meant to land at, so nobody knew how they'd get the plane out.

A day or so later, they got the plane out by opening up the throttles and pulling back on the yoke. I think they might have unloaded some fuel or cargo first just to be safe, but short field operations are kind of the reason the C-17 was sold to the Air Force to begin with.

Mainly, I'm curious if the air traffic controllers at the base challenged the airliner during its approach. If the two airfields are close enough together, they might not have noticed anything amiss until the plane was already gliding in for the landing.

TamH70 Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Faithful to 2D
#14770: Jul 9th 2016 at 9:01:52 PM

Hopefully we're going to get cockpit and tower voice transmission transcripts of this debacle. It should be worth some really black giggles.

Edit.

Wait, what? It happened in the same fricking airbase before?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/delta-a320-passenger-jet-accidentally-lands-ellsworth-air-force-military-base-south-dakota-a7128341.html

"According to the FAA, a Northwest Airlines flight on its way way to Rapid City also accidentally landed at Ellsworth Air Force Base in 2004."

That explains why no-one swatted it out the sky - they must have been used to it happening by now.

edited 9th Jul '16 9:04:17 PM by TamH70

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14771: Jul 10th 2016 at 2:01:00 AM

ATC does not necessarily know where an airplane is, especially one that is very close to the ground where transponder and radar signals are attenuated by obstacles. Also, to my understanding the descent into the airport is usually not micro-managed by ATC, once you are on the glideslope and are cleared to land, you go.

As for crash-landing a civilian air plane deliberately on a military airbase as a sabotage maneuvre, that's a really uncommon sort of thing. Far less common than landing at the wrong airport. I would not be surprised if there wasn't a protocol for the former scenario at all.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#14772: Jul 10th 2016 at 3:00:22 AM

[up] Rapid City Airport also does not have ILS, which makes descent harder.

From here:

Story reported there have been over 150 incidents since the "early 1990s" of commercial (pax and cargo) aircraft starting to land at the wrong airport in the U.S. - of which 35 continued to a landing; the other crews caught their error while still on approach and went around.

Also a thread on other incidents.

Keep Rolling On
AFP Since: Mar, 2010
#14773: Jul 10th 2016 at 4:41:56 PM

I presume they'd treat such an attack much the same as they would any other plane crash, which military airbases do plan and train for.

LeGarcon Blowout soon fellow Stalker from Skadovsk Since: Aug, 2013 Relationship Status: Gay for Big Boss
Blowout soon fellow Stalker
#14775: Jul 10th 2016 at 6:09:51 PM

The Mi-35M? That's the super modernized Hind isn't it?

Oh really when?

Total posts: 19,197
Top