The Military Thread:

Total posts: [39,081]
1 ... 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252
1253
1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 ... 1564
31301 TuefelHundenIV19th Mar 2014 02:52:07 AM from Wandering. , Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Watchmen of the Apocalypse
Except it isn't pure logistics. Again my point stands quite well. You need the fighting arm and the fighting arm needs the supplies. You need both. There is no way around it.

You can have a big warehouse full of ammo but does jack shit if someone isn't there to shoot it. Unless you like staring at crates of unopened ammo all day.
"Who watches the watchmen?"
31302 entropy1319th Mar 2014 03:10:53 AM from Somewhere only we know. , Relationship Status: Drift compatible
わからない
If we're really going to be pedantic, a catapult is the logistics of boulder delivery. Artillery is the delivery of highly explosive packages...
I'm reading this because it's interesting. I think.
Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot, over.
31303 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 03:45:16 AM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
Again, isn't the standard expression for bombing and such called "delivery system"? Or is that just for nukies?

edited 19th Mar '14 3:45:49 AM by TheHandle

It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31304 GeekCodeRed19th Mar 2014 03:48:49 AM from City of the Damned , Relationship Status: I made a point to burn all of the photographs
What's the trope for skin contact magic?
So, question: How many nukes exist that aren't on official record, or have been lost? I know the second one is a scarily common occurence.
31305 Greenmantle19th Mar 2014 04:08:49 AM from Greater Wessex , Relationship Status: I know
Phantom of the Spey
[up] Nobody knows publicly. That is deeply Classified Information.
"It's been a long, hard road but you must carry on"
31306 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 04:15:25 AM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
I betcha nobody knows period.
It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31307 kurushio19th Mar 2014 04:30:05 AM from Berlin, Germany , Relationship Status: I've got a total eclipse of the heart
Happy Human
About the logistics thing: I think I'm with Teuf here. That whole "experts study logistics" thing is true, sure; but it's very, very trite. Because logistics is, in one way, very easy: Manpower.

Take my time as a conscript: I spent two and a half months in basic (and watch & security) training. That made me barely able to fight as an infantryman in a squad sized formation. Very barely.

On the other hand, it took not even a month to get my MOS as a logistics guy for headquarters & service companies, the same MOS the lower-ranked NCOs in the materiel squad had. Other guys in the first company? Truck drivers, fuel, ammo, repair? All one month, maximum two. At the lower ranks, logistics are easy to do, and manpower needs are easy to fill.

Switching over to the guys from basic who went to the fighting companies: Tank driver, two months. Gunner? Not withing additional voluntary service time. Gepard gunner? Four months. And that is the minimal training time; no field exercises, nothing advanced. Others around here will known how long it takes to train a really competent infantryman.

Looking at that lower end of the food chain, re-growing the tail is easy. Re-growing the teeth is not. You can teach someone to put a bomb on a plane in a few hours, I guess, but you can't train him to fly it (more than once).

That is where the real division between logistics and fighting troops lies, methinks, and why it is important.
31308 3of419th Mar 2014 04:40:18 AM from Five Seconds in the Future. , Relationship Status: I'd need a PowerPoint presentation
Feeble Turte Duck
I'd assume you can teach them to fly pretty quick...the issue is teaching them to land ;)
LMage: NO ONE ASKED FOR YOUR WITCHCRAFT THREE
31309 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 04:40:31 AM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
Wow, that's, like, a Master's Degree or something.

Do we have any CO's on this thread?

[up]Landing. Landing never changes.

edited 19th Mar '14 4:41:23 AM by TheHandle

It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31310 Achaemenid19th Mar 2014 05:07:47 AM from Tsarskoye Selo , Relationship Status: Every rose has its thorn
Liberator
A couple of nice - and short - documentaries I found from the old BBC Decisive Weapons series about...well, decisive weapons. Quality's patchy, but not ruinous. Narrated by Boromir:

Annoying, most of the rest aren't online. They had one about the Huey, which was excellent.

edited 19th Mar '14 5:09:33 AM by Achaemenid

31311 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 05:33:03 AM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
What kind of dramatic pause enthusiasm is his?
It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31312 Achaemenid19th Mar 2014 05:36:37 AM from Tsarskoye Selo , Relationship Status: Every rose has its thorn
Liberator
[up]

No PTSD for him! He looks and sounds like he had the time of his life.
31313 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 05:39:55 AM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
Well, PTSD is a very random, poorly-understood kinda thing. It's not even particularly linked to bloodlust. Speaking of which, is it true that only one in every fifty soldiers actually enjoys killing enemies?
It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31314 Flanker6619th Mar 2014 06:41:36 AM from 30,000 feet and climbing , Relationship Status: You can be my wingman any time
Fearless
Again, isn't the standard expression for bombing and such called "delivery system"? Or is that just for nukies?

No, the delivery system is the thing that actually "delivers" the payload. An example of a delivery system would be an air to air missile. The actual task would be Quick Reaction Alert, CAP, and so on. It's just a simpler, more convenient means of referring to certain aspects.

It's not useful to conflate the actual employment of weapons with logistics, and as I mentioned before is terribly misleading. If you make the definition vague enough, you can make a word mean anything to the point of uselessness.

@Emphasis on logistics:

Remembering to keep up with logistics is of course a fine bit of advice, though I'd contend that a force with a long tail and relatively short teeth (i.e. an army that's well supplied and (hopefully) of high quality, but has little operational depth) is not so much an army - never mind an effective one - as a token force guarding said supplies.

A balance must be struck. Focusing on manpower might lead to a chronically ill-supplied army that has low morale. Focusing on logistics can leave you with a hollow force that will crumple inward with the first blow. Neither is ideal.
Locking you up on radar since '09

Time is everything; 5 minutes make the difference between victory & defeat. — Horatio Nelson
31315 GeekCodeRed19th Mar 2014 06:45:36 AM from City of the Damned , Relationship Status: I made a point to burn all of the photographs
What's the trope for skin contact magic?
Star Trek Replicators and Transporters would render logistics moot, however. tongue
31316 Deadbeatloser2219th Mar 2014 06:46:48 AM from le Secret♪ , Relationship Status: Hoping Senpai notices me
Heroine of Justice
Well, no, because Replicators need base matter to work from.
Some men just want to watch the world burn. Others provide the matches.
31317 GeekCodeRed19th Mar 2014 06:48:18 AM from City of the Damned , Relationship Status: I made a point to burn all of the photographs
What's the trope for skin contact magic?
They do? I just thought they created matter from energy.
31318 Deadbeatloser2219th Mar 2014 06:49:22 AM from le Secret♪ , Relationship Status: Hoping Senpai notices me
Heroine of Justice
No, because then you've violated the first law of thermodynamics.
Some men just want to watch the world burn. Others provide the matches.
31319 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 06:53:52 AM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
Focusing on manpower might lead to a chronically ill-supplied army that has low morale.

Is this why the USMC are famously cynical and grumpy?

a force with a long tail and relatively short teeth (i.e. an army that's well supplied and (hopefully) of high quality, but has little operational depth) is not so much an army - never mind an effective one - as a token force guarding said supplies.

And that would be the Air Force, at least when it comes to the ground troops, am I right?

edited 19th Mar '14 6:55:06 AM by TheHandle

It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31320 Nohbody19th Mar 2014 06:58:04 AM from Somewhere in Dixie , Relationship Status: Mu
Just zis guy
^^ Not that ST was shy about violating the laws of physics to hell and back when it suited the plot... tongue

But yeah, there are actual limits on replicators, even if not seen in the shows/movies.

edited 19th Mar '14 6:58:24 AM by Nohbody

Action is Virtue. Idleness is Vice.
Just another battle in the Pacific theatre.

(Obviously Japanese soldiers were deadlier than this, but hey.
Follow your passion, be prepared to work hard and sacrifice, and, above all, don't let anyone limit your dreams. - Donovan Daily

31322 TuefelHundenIV19th Mar 2014 12:25:48 PM from Wandering. , Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Watchmen of the Apocalypse
Entropy: Um no. It is not a piece of logistics equipment even pedantically. It is a siege engine. Artillery is not a logistics item it is a weapon. A rifle and bayonet are not logistics items they are weapons. An infantry rifleman is not delivering ammunition they are firing it as they attack or defend.

A cargo truck is a logistics item. A pallet of supplies is a logistics item. MRE's are frighteningly enough logistics items.

A bomber may deliver bombs to the target but there is vast ocean of difference in delivering a bomb on pallet to a depot for storage and dropping it on someones head.

Handle: The Marines aren't famed for guarding supply depots. Marines see plenty of action and are small compared to the other branches. Were grumpy for a variety of other reasons.
"Who watches the watchmen?"
31323 TheHandle19th Mar 2014 12:33:20 PM from Barcelona , Relationship Status: In love with love
The most dangerous thing...
That's what I meant, Marines are highly offensive shock troops, have more emphasis on tooth than tail, strike deep into enemy territory, etc. and thus are always short on stuff. Air Force troops are well-supplied because their main role is guarding planes and supplies: lots of tail, not as much tooth. Am I getting this right?
It takes guts to learn anatomy.
31324 Flanker6619th Mar 2014 12:38:00 PM from 30,000 feet and climbing , Relationship Status: You can be my wingman any time
Fearless
I'd point out that the real teeth of air forces aren't their ground components or (depending on the organisation) their air defence batteries, but the aircraft, aircrew and the ordinance they deploy. After all, it'd be absurd to claim that the RAF Regiment is intended to be the predominant component of the RAF and thus the RAF is dangerously undermanned because there's less people in the RAF Regiment than aircrew and technical staffnote .
Locking you up on radar since '09

Time is everything; 5 minutes make the difference between victory & defeat. — Horatio Nelson
31325 TuefelHundenIV19th Mar 2014 02:18:42 PM from Wandering. , Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Watchmen of the Apocalypse
The Marines have a pretty hefty tail end trust me. Even in field exercises the FOB areas have largely support personnel especially supply and maintenance.
"Who watches the watchmen?"

Total posts: 39,081
1 ... 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252
1253
1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 ... 1564