Total posts:
[25]
1
Maybe someday
Why is this a redirect to Misogyny Song? Even if misandry and misogyny were literally identical in meaning, were there simply not enough examples to justify making it a separate trope? If that's the case, why is there even a redirect at all?
With Mod Hat On
Opening after a month, but clocking since it looks like a quibble topic.

Both fill a similar role - "Your gender makes you inferior". The direction it is going in isn't really that major of a distinction.

Zzzzzzzzzz
They aren't used differently. The audience isn't expected to react differently. They serve the same basic purpose in the work. There is no reason to make two different tropes for the same thing.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.

Explosion!
It would be nice to at least make the name gender neutral as its is both.

Zzzzzzzzzz
That's why we have gendered redirects. There is no gender neutral term that is anywhere near as clear as Misandry Song / Misogyny Song.
edited 30th Oct '14 6:24:50 AM by Madrugada
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.

Explosion!
There may be redirects but that certainly doesn't clear up the name on the page when clicked nor the description and the examples which is written exclusively for one side, the redirect might as well not exist.
And Misandry Songs do exist, heck Britney Spears and Taylor Swift have sung several, but they tend to be a bit different than Misogyny Songs and fall under the radar because they usually do not go to the super extreme as certain Misogyny Songs.
edited 30th Oct '14 8:17:57 AM by Memers

Ugh, there was some big issue I saw when this topic first got posted but I completely forgot what it was because I couldn't post.
Hrm. Hopefully I'll remember before the clock's up.

When will people get over the fact that English is not a gender neutral language? At least we aren't making this site in any of the romantic languages...

Misandry And Misogyny Songs
Good night, drive home safely.

Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
-Philip K. Dick
-Philip K. Dick

A Wizard boy
It's not the "perfect" name at all. Too long and to me it also sounds like it needs to be both about misandry and misogyny. Also, I don't agree with gender parity being a reason for such a rename.

"to me it also sounds like it needs to be both about misandry and misogyny."
C'mon, people.
A Wizard boy
Evidently, people disagree with you.

Explosion!
I think the name might be fine but the description is not, it really needs to have paragraphs for both. The first can cover the males hating females and the 'Bitches and hoes' variety. The woman hating men variety in a second section and explaining how it usually takes the form of a 'Bad Breakup Song and bash all men along the way'

jamespolk - as has already been noted, the naming convention in use on this wiki is that something named "X and Y" requires both X and Y to be present. As such, the comments regarding your proposed title are 100% correct.
Memers - if you feel there should be a paragraph describing how the misandry ones differ, write one to expand upon the note that Madrugada added about them. Also, while you are at it why not add in the examples you cited for Britany Spears and Taylor Swift?
18 doubleyouteeeff1st Nov 2014 06:06:07 AM from (Hudson) River running right on over my head
, Relationship Status: Owner of a lonely heart

Political ends as sad remains will die
No strong feelings one way or the other about a rename, but I'll suggest Sexism Song or Sexist Song.
Why are parodies, deconstructions and subversions at the top of the examples list?
Not right away, not right away

Sexist and Misandrist/Misogynist are not the same thing. There are many ways to be sexist without either of those two things and it would lead to massive trope decay. No dice.
edited 1st Nov '14 7:08:18 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
-Philip K. Dick
-Philip K. Dick

Explosion!

A Wizard boy
No, I do not realize it. Still unconvinced. And how it's used on the wiki has more importance than off-wiki usage.


If they are trope names, yes, because trope names aren't the same thing as work titles. We have our own shorthand for clarity because a lot of the time we're troping the intersection of two separate elements into a single trope.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
-Philip K. Dick
-Philip K. Dick
With Mod Hat On
Well, predictably, this thread became a back and forth debate over the name. I'll make a call that this is not enough useful discussion to leave the thread open now that the clock expired; closing this.
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
Total posts: 25
1