Follow TV Tropes

Following

Poor Image: Go Through Me

Go To

Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#1: Jun 8th 2014 at 6:57:57 AM

I'm having a hard time making out what's going on in the image on Go Through Me; the image is lacking in contrast. In particular, I'm not seeing that the girl is defending anyone, which is what the trope is about; she appears to be standing in front of some rocks, or perhaps a fallen tree.

I think we can do better. From the page's own webcomic section, this one (panel 2+3) or that one (panel 9) would be an improvement. Other suggestions are also welcome.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#2: Jun 8th 2014 at 7:31:47 AM

Agree on the current being poor. Either of your suggestions are good, although I think 1&3 of the first suggestion may work even better than 2&3. Panel #9 of the second suggestion is excellent, too.

Here's 1 and 3 vertically:

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#3: Jun 8th 2014 at 7:33:48 AM

The reason I suggested 1&3 rather than 2&3 is that 2 doesn't show who she's attacking — the only thing indicating that it isn't Hinjo in the first place is the speed lines behind him in 3 and they're easy to miss seeing. Using 1 instead makes it abundantly clear that she's attacking Belkar and Hinjo has stepped in between them, even if you don't notice the movement lines.

edited 8th Jun '14 7:35:09 AM by Madrugada

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#4: Jun 8th 2014 at 8:06:19 AM

[up][up] That looks very good.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
troacctid "µ." from California Since: Apr, 2010
#5: Jun 8th 2014 at 2:34:25 PM

This shouldn't need more than one frame. Also, both the suggestions contain spoilers. I'm not a fan.

Rhymes with "Protracted."
ShadowHog from Earth Since: May, 2009 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
#6: Jun 8th 2014 at 5:01:29 PM

I'm not sure it's an example, but what comes to mind is the famous/infamous Tiananmen Square tank man.

Moon
Spark9 Gentleman Troper! from Castle Wulfenbach Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Pining for the fjords
Gentleman Troper!
#7: Jun 8th 2014 at 5:35:45 PM

[up][up] That's not a spoiler. This character attacked the protagonists from the very first time she appeared (and several times in the middle as well), so the fact that she's once again attacking a protagonist is completely expected.

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#8: Jun 8th 2014 at 5:46:56 PM

Neither of the Order of the Stick ones are spoilers, unless you consider "anything that someone might not have read yet" a spoiler.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#9: Jun 8th 2014 at 7:54:10 PM

I have no issue with the current. There's the waif-like girl in front of what looks like a suit of armor. I guess I can see someone having issue telling it's armor, but it's not good enough to replace without a good suggestion...

... which the OOTS examples are not. First off, they're extremely light on the "weaker character is defending someone" part, and are more about plain defending someone. Secondly... they're OOTS. Which is a a webcomic I love, but much like XKCD I only think we should use if it's a trope that we can't otherwise illustrate because they're very visually... uninteresting.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
theAdeptrogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#10: Jun 8th 2014 at 8:15:22 PM

[up]I have the same concern. I don't think the current image is poor or unclear, just a bit dark. But even if the armored dude behind her isn't very distinct from the background, what the girl is trying to do is clear enough from her pose.

The defender in the OOTS suggestion, on the other hand, looks stronger than the protagonist, so I'm not sure it even qualifies as an example.

Here's a brightened version of the current, if it helps.

edited 8th Jun '14 8:20:36 PM by theAdeptrogue

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#11: Jun 8th 2014 at 9:28:54 PM

[up] Gotta admit, that's certainly more succinct than the OOTS pics.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#13: Jun 9th 2014 at 12:50:13 AM

10 is good.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Hello, I love you
#14: Jun 9th 2014 at 5:46:02 AM

10's an improvement on current... which is still better than the suggestions. I'd be fine with it as a quality upgrade.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
theAdeptRogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
#15: Jun 23rd 2014 at 6:02:32 AM

I've switched out the current with @10 for now (since it's the exact same image, just brightened)

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#16: Jun 23rd 2014 at 10:08:18 AM

The swap looks good...the caption is terrible.

nitrokitty Since: Jun, 2010 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#18: Jul 6th 2014 at 9:02:22 PM

Maybe "The compassionate soul may provide a stronger shield than steel or stone." as a new caption?

theAdeptRogue iRidescence Since: Nov, 2011 Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
iRidescence
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#20: Jul 7th 2014 at 12:12:09 AM

Yep, that caption is good.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#21: Jul 10th 2014 at 4:26:44 AM

Bump; any other thoughts on 18?

EDIT: Actually, I'm going to close this and take the discussion to the new thread for captions. Locking up.

edited 10th Jul '14 4:27:26 AM by Willbyr

Add Post

Total posts: 21
Top