I like that second one.
^^ Douglas Adams wrote parts 4 of 3 and 5 of 3, also. And the fourth book is called So Long, and Thanks For All the Fish, diminishing (IMO) the follow-up-soundiness of the title And Another Thing. Not much hint he died before 6 of 3... not good I don't think.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Someone who knows that much about the series also knows when Douglas Adams died.
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableIt's not bad, but "people who are familiar with the source will understand it's an example" is not a very strong argument.
I like the second UT cover more though, that name seems much more suggestive of the author being dead:
Although then again that is stuff he wrote while he was alive...
Maybe book covers is barking up the wrong tree?
edited 8th Jul '13 11:11:27 PM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Umm, did you forget the point that was in response to? The complete argument was 'people who aren't familiar with the series have enough evidence to conclude it's an example, even if some of that evidence is misleading; people who are familiar enough with the series to know which evidence is misleading already know that it's an example anyway'.
I don't have any improvements to suggest.
The Revolution Will Not Be TropeableThe way I see it: To someone that is unfamiliar to the series: The name and "6 of 3" make it sound like it's continued after the original author has conclusively stopped writing them altogether.
To someone who isn't familiar with the series: The name and "6 of 3" won't make it seem like it's an example, but it won't cause any harm because he will know anyway.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.^^ I understand and no I didn't forget anything. I get it. That makes sense. But "if the reader is not familiar with the source that detail will make it look like an example, and if they are familiar that detail won't help but they will know it is an example anyway" isn't a strong argument in any circumstances, especially the second part :P Not saying it isn't true, saying it's not convincing.
^ The trope isn't "continued after the original author has conclusively stopped writing them altogether", it is "continued after the original author has died". Tropes Are Flexible and all, but that means something different.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.I think it's a good, convincing argument. It shows that even if something isn't an technically true, it can help illustrate the trope anyway due to appearances, and the knowledge to find out that's not actually the case comes after the knowledge that it's an example anyway.
Check out my fanfiction!Clock is set.
[/MOD MODE]
I still like 30.
Crowner?
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Crowner.
Crowner!
... sorry. I had to.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Pre-weekend bump for votes.
One more bump...if the votes/ratios hold steady, I think we can call this one tomorrow.
Calling this one. The new pic's up and tagged; I'll pothole it in a sec. Caption or no?
Locking up.
Crown Description:
Nominations for replacement images:
Probably because most works don't try to make "the original author you loved is dead, but we let a rank amateur try to imitate em" into a selling point. "And Another Thing" hints at it in multiple ways (the prominent names of both the old and new author, 'part 6 of 3', the title itself), which is probably as good as we're likely to get.
A cursory GIS didn't turn up any useful advertising for Brandon Sanderson's The Wheel Of Time that would be better.
Unfinished◊ Tales◊ has a suggestive name, I guess.
edited 8th Jul '13 5:31:12 PM by Noaqiyeum
The Revolution Will Not Be Tropeable