Considering the title of the work is redlinked, I think the answer is no. 
How do we source that image anyway? Do we pothole to the Red Link?
Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.
We make the work page for the expressed purpose of linking it to the picture. :p
"Express
purpose."
A link to a non-existent work page (red link) is fine. Someone may create that page someday.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
We have redlinked images before, for example Intimate Healing and Black Gal on White Guy Drama.
edit: Just "reredlinked" Black Gal on White Guy Drama.
edited 28th May '13 9:23:39 PM by m8e
Zzzzzzzzzz
Is the only question left here what to link it to? Making a redlink is fine, making a page for the source is fine, leaving it unlinked and noting the source in a comment in the source code so that it can be linked if a page is ever made for the source is also fine.
Pick one and do it.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
I made a call that 15 has just enough consensus to put it up instead of the current. Didn't add the caption tho', as I am not 100% sure we have caption consensus.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
No, the other one.
Add mine to 15.
Check out my fanfiction!
Hi
It's been a few days since the pic was put up and there hasn't been any caption discussion, so I'm good to lock this up.
^^ But we wouldn't exactly want to be duplicating a works page, right?
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.