JAFAAC, motion to pull.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!+1 to pull...this is gonna take a lot more context than is in that pic.
Agree on JAFAAC.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanYeah, that's JAFAAC. I agree that it should be pulled.
Do we want a replacement? We can show two characters living together but you wouldn't know that they're not involved.
I'm not sure that we'd be able to do this without a lampshade.
Seeing as how this trope is about the ABSENCE of something (namely: intimacy), I think this pic◊ is about as close as we can hope to get:
Just three people - two male, one female - sitting on a couch. Through one thing or another, they all look like they live there. For instance, you would not be in your jammies while eating cereal anywhere except your own home. Likewise, you wouldn't be putting your feet up on the couch unless you're at home. Or at least seriously rude.
edited 27th Apr '13 4:00:42 AM by peasant
I think it kind of works. It looks like they're living together, and none of them seem to be dating.
Check out my fanfiction!Also, that she's leaning on the guy on the right...hmmmm...I'll give this a weak .
Acceptable.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!It works.
They're being so casual they really look like just roommates.
I agree. Just by looking at this picture, i can tell all three live here.
Image Source. Please update whenever an image is changed.One or two more s and we can run with it.
That's... shockingly good. from me as well.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.Good enough. It's up, potholed, tagged, and the example is added to the page. Caption or no?
"Nope. No sexy times happening here."
edited 27th Apr '13 6:16:19 PM by peasant
Doesn't need a caption, imho.
Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!No consensus; locking up.
It's three faces and a caption. If we're going to have a picture for this couldn't we find something with some cohabitation?