Follow TV Tropes

Following

Does Not Illustrate: Vapor Wear

Go To

spacemarine50 Since: Mar, 2012
#1: Apr 8th 2013 at 2:11:47 AM

Current pic does not demonstrate this trope, and may even not fit the laconic (isn't wearing a bra, yet she is/can wearing one that's hidden). The pic under the image links actually demonstrate this. Also, wearing only a bra/underwear isn't this trope.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#2: Apr 8th 2013 at 3:14:47 AM

The trope isn't just about the bra, though. It illustrates.

Check out my fanfiction!
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#3: Apr 8th 2013 at 3:31:11 AM

Previous topic

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#4: Apr 8th 2013 at 4:02:18 AM

When a female character's costume doesn't include a bra — or, for that matter, any underclothes at all.

Look at the cutout on the side of her pants and the cut of her top along the side and back. Nothing there. This is a prime keeper.

edited 8th Apr '13 4:03:52 AM by Willbyr

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#5: Apr 8th 2013 at 4:56:13 AM

The top could be hiding a bra, yes, but those pants make it quite clear that there's no lower-body underwear of any kind. Therefore it is both an example and an illustration, without being so explicit as to invite an image-escalation.

Keep.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#6: Apr 8th 2013 at 4:58:49 AM

Keep Until Better Image Suggested for all the arguments.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
peasant Since: Mar, 2011
#7: Apr 8th 2013 at 6:51:31 AM

What about this picture of Tina Barrett of S Club 7 fame? Other pics from the same event: [1][2]

edited 8th Apr '13 6:54:41 AM by peasant

Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#8: Apr 8th 2013 at 7:00:56 AM

No, that's exactly the type of picture that will lead to an image-escalation war, as people decide that it isn't risque enough.

The current one is excellent at demonstrating the trope without being masturbation-fodder.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#9: Apr 8th 2013 at 7:04:32 AM

I am fine with the current, but out of curiosity: How do you tell that an image is going to cause an escalation war?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#10: Apr 8th 2013 at 7:06:54 AM

[up] Past precedent; it's why some of the fanservicey tropes are tagged for "no image".

edited 8th Apr '13 7:07:18 AM by Willbyr

Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#11: Apr 8th 2013 at 7:10:42 AM

Normally I'm loathe to invoke mod fiat in here, but the OP's reasons against the pic are invalid and anything else potentially runs the risk of leading to the scenario Maddy mentioned, so I'm shutting this down.

edited 8th Apr '13 8:55:56 PM by Willbyr

Add Post

Total posts: 11
Top