Since we've gotten told to stop talking generally about religion twice in the Homosexuality and Religion thread and were told that, if we want to talk generally about religion, we need to make a new thread, I have made a new thread.
Full disclosure: I am an agnostic atheist and anti-theist, but I'm very interested in theology and religion.
Mod Edit: All right, there are a couple of ground rules here:
- This is not a thread for mindless bashing of religion or of atheism/agnosticism etc. All view points are welcome here. Let's have a civil debate.
- Religion is a volatile subject. Please don't post here if you can't manage a civil discussion with viewpoints you disagree with. There will be no tolerance for people who can't keep the tone light hearted.
- There is no one true answer for this thread. Don't try to force out opposing voices.
edited 9th Feb '14 1:01:31 PM by Madrugada
If you dont, I am shipping it with the monkey king in the Ramayana in my own religious fanfics.
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesI think a friend of mine told me about a book in which there were three people and all three of them were "god", because each one of them was one of the aspects of the trinity. I can't remember what the name of the book was. I think of them was a black woman, the other one asian, and I can't remember the third one.
No. If it's me writing it, it will have a Semantic Power based on holiness puns. Holiday forces the target to rest. Holy Smokes causes the target confusion and disorientation. Holy Ghosting is a way of breaking off a party member through ignoring and ostracising them. Hallowed Ground summons a cemetery, very useful with a necromancer on the team. Holy Wood transports the party and opponents to Faerie, where dreams come true and everything is fake. Consecration gives the target immunity to all criticism. Sacrifice martyrs the target for the cause. And the Annunciation makes a nun out of a nonce and vice-versa. If the target is born immaculate of sin, it allows to summon the Son, though He takes thirty turns to become relevant. The move is named Cue The Son.
Once all three elements of the Trinity are summoned...
edited 31st Jul '15 3:59:53 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.The problem with the Holy Spirit as a character is that people usually think about it as a cosmic force rather than a person.
One could argue that Star Wars's Force is a Crystal Dragon Holy Spirit, though.
edited 31st Jul '15 3:57:35 PM by Protagonist506
"Any campaign world where an orc samurai can leap off a landcruiser to fight a herd of Bulbasaurs will always have my vote of confidence"As for a fictional Crystal Dragon Jesus religion I'm writing, I'm thinking that how I'll treat it is that the Holy Spirit-expy is some weird, Elderitch force that created the universe. YHWH-expy is the Anthropomorphic Personification of it, and the Son is a Physical Avatar of YWHW.
"Any campaign world where an orc samurai can leap off a landcruiser to fight a herd of Bulbasaurs will always have my vote of confidence"If you look at it from the right perspective, the Bible and most other holy books are basically compilations of fan fiction.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"In my own opinion, the Trinity always seemed to be trying to explain the various conflicting aspects of god.
You have the close and almost human figure, who can care about you deeply as an individual.
You have the great and often wrathful lawgiver who will bring destruction and harsh judgment if needed.
You have the distant and impersonal cosmic force, vast and powerful enough to create and entire universe.
And somehow they're all the same person.
edited 1st Aug '15 3:50:21 AM by Matues
Personally, how I view it is trichotomy.
The son is any physical aspect of God (body)
The father is Gods mind.
The Holy Spirit is Gods soul.
"Any campaign world where an orc samurai can leap off a landcruiser to fight a herd of Bulbasaurs will always have my vote of confidence"Most of us have those things (at least if you believe in souls) and don't get counted as three people.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Having experienced so many protestant denominations where each holds their interpretation of the concept as the only acceptable canon, part of me wonders if the idea was created in part just to give the various denominations something to endlessly bicker over.
In that light, is it any wonder that us Muslims consider the whole thing nonsensical?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.
I'm reminded of the Primordals from the Exalted Tabletop game. They're the primal creators of the cosmos; are so big that the souls of their souls have souls.
The facets of their personalty have their own independent existences as things like people or mobile terrain features.
The history of it is that it's a compromise between factions of Christians who emphasized Jesus humanity, and others who emphasized his god-hood.
"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."A-ha. Conservasumption of Cake.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.You could apply this logic to a whole lot of religious concepts.
"I think a friend of mine told me about a book in which there were three people and all three of them were "god", because each one of them was one of the aspects of the trinity. I can't remember what the name of the book was. I think of them was a black woman, the other one asian, and I can't remember the third one."
It's called The Shack. God the Father is an African American woman, Jesus is a Middle Eastern carpenter (because, of course he is) and the Holy Spirit is an Asian woman. A personification of God's wisdom shows up at one point as well.
Not Three Laws compliant.But how many of them don't make logical sense even to their own adherents?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Most people who believe in the trinity claim it makes sense to them.
"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."If that is true, then it's far from being reflected by the responses to my question on the topic.
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Specially for the Muslims it would be incredibly nonsensical, since saying it is "three for one" is basically opposed to the Tawhid
Like trying to explain to your average christian or catholic or whatever the Jinn. "So yeah, so there is god" "Ok. I can understand this" "And he created humans" "Cool. I can get behind that" "And also angels" "He sure did! Great!" "And humans have free will and angels do not" "Fantastic! We are in agreement!" "Also he created free willed supernatural creatures called djinn that basically go about doing random shit" "Wait what" "They are made of smokeless fire" "stahp" "And have a physical form" "y u do dis" "And they can whisper to your SOOOOOOOOOOUL" "..."
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesDjinns make way more sense than the trinity and are far simpler a concept. Spirits with free will. What's hard to understand about that?
I'd compare the trinity to the wave-particle duality. It's just wierd and hard to grasp for a human mind.
I don't get the Djinn tho. They don't worship god. They don't fuck with anything.They don't seem to form part of anything. Seems like god just up and made them for shits and giggles. Which is fine and understandable but you know. Since it is not mentioned something of the likes of "and on the 8th day Allah rolled up a good one and totes made this badass smokey things, man", the Djinn seem to fulfill no purpose at all.
Like the wacky sidekick in the story that does not seem to further the plot but is still there. They are the third wheel of god's creation.
It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothesMaybe there's more than one God and/or Parthenon at play?
Keep Rolling OnI occasionally ponder really dumb ways religions could turn out wrong.
Like, maybe the trinity is sort of right, but instead of three distinct personas god actually has, say, forty-six.
There appears to be not one work of fiction in which the Holy Ghost is a character. Handle, it falls to you to write... the first one.
Let us know when you have a draft.
"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."