|
|
![]() HAHAHA GOOD TIMES
Mark Webb is returning to direct and Garfield and Stone are reprising their roles.Just awesome like that
"We could not be more confident in the direction we are taking this new 'Spider-Man' storyline, and we are tremendously excited to be ramping up production again with Marc at the helm and Andrew continuing on as Peter Parker, " Columbia president Doug Belgrad told THR. "We can’t wait to share what we have in store for Peter and Spider-Man with audiences worldwide."
It might just be because it's so relatively early in production, but they couldn't be any more vague here, could they?
I see the Awesomeness.
Maybe Sony decided to actually realize that low funding leads to lower profit and are deciding they can invest in the series again instead of of just putting up a movie to keep the rights?
Just awesome like that
I still say it was better than the original three. Even if it was solely made to keep the rights, there was clear effort put into the script, acting, and effects.
![]() Trained by Flim and Flam
Heh. "Webb."
BUY A CAR FROM ME!
Just awesome like that
![]() Greg 'The Cat' Longcrier
How's about not?
I felt bad enough for watching the first for a dollar at the Cheap Theatre! It was just clumsy and rushed and clearly stunk of everything Movie Bob had to say about the film. And I did try to judge it on my own merits, but the more I watched it the more Bob's review videos came to mind.
It's not even Spiderman. It's garbage. Garfield and Stone clearly have passion for the characters they play and the rest of the cast is just as excellent. It's a shame, again, that they had to work with the script instead of cutting to the chase and improvising it out. Instead it very much is the product of a childish corporation refusing to give the other's toy back. That they've already announced the sequel is far from shocking.
http://www.longcriercat.deviantart.com
I'm thirsty. Got any ink?
Resident Pen Ward antagonist.
![]() Eccentric Dreamer
It wasn't a failure by any stretch of the imagination, but it did way better internationally than in North America, and for some reason film companies don't tend to pay much attention to the international gross.
It also didn't break any records, but it did make back many times its budget. Remind me again why Hollywood is apparently in trouble? If this is a failure, their metrics are really off.
DemiKids Liveblog time!
![]() Trained by Flim and Flam
Let me have my moment, 0dd1.
BUY A CAR FROM ME!
![]() It eluded us then, but that’s no matter —tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther ... And one fine morning —
![]() Slasher-Fixated Geekboy
Even so, go ahead and look up what Sony's top four highest-grossing films are.
![]() Trope on a Rope
Given the backlash against the very existence of a reboot occurring so quickly after the last film, I'm impressed it did as well as it did. I honestly think there's going to be a big audience for this via onDemand and DVD/Blu Ray, with people getting the chance to see it without the stigma of being seen as unnecessary.
Still waiting for a Legion of Losers movie...
![]() Way of Life
I'm for this. I did enjoy the movie and I would love to see this continue on.
Bored. Bored. Bored. Bored. Bored.
Raven Wilder
In my opinion, The Amazing Spider-Man was miles ahead of any of the Sam Raimi Spider-Man films, and I'm glad they're not trying to change course with the sequel.
"It takes an idiot to do cool things, that's why it's cool" - Haruhara Haruko
![]() The Razruchityel
I don't get most of the hate for the new movie. I thought it was better than the original one at the very least.
One thing in particular that stuck out is that it tried to be it's own movie. When you watch it and the other one back to back you can tell they tried to tell their own story. Now you can say Amazing was worse but I give them points for at least trying to be original.
Just awesome like that
@Veni Vidi Pony: Fair 'nuff.
![]() Me writing fanfics
edited 2nd Oct '12 10:53:08 AM by Watchtower ![]() ![]() Fury burns.
Definitely not gonna see it. Seeing the first one was already a huge waste of my money.
I mean, skateboarding Peter Parker? Gimme a break. At least Sam Raimi made Peter a dork. The Amazing take on him has no identity, and is just cobbled together from elements that the marketing people think makes a teenager "cool".
I'd rather see a full-length movie adaptation of One More Day than a sequel to Skater Pete.
Knowing is growing.
TV Tropes by
TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org. Privacy Policy |