TV Tropes Org


search forum titles
google site search
Wiki Headlines
We've switched servers and will be updating the old code over the next couple months, meaning that several things might break. Please report issues here.
The old description for the trope (before my recent edit) seems to come across more about complaining about the hero sparing the villain at all (and a little too specifically about a falling death). The original point of the trope isn't about the Hero not killing the villain out of Joker Immunity or a misapplication of Thou Shalt Not Kill, but rather the fact that the villain is now helpless before the hero. It's literally a matter of the type of person the hero is. Is he the kind of person who would kill a helpless (or unarmed if it's a matter of honor) man?

Now when it's done wrong, that's when the writers fail to apply it universally. Sparing the villain after the battle when you killed Mooks (or The Dragon) during it is not a misuse of the trope in and of itself. Now if the hero spared the villain after blowing up the enemy barracks, then you did something wrong.

 2 nrjxll, Thu, 20th Sep '12 5:38:15 PM Relationship Status: Not war
We don't need editorializing of any sort in trope articles.

 3 Star Valkyrie, Thu, 20th Sep '12 7:15:17 PM Relationship Status: Shipping fictional characters
I think the main problem is that its not clear atm if its just a list of uses of a stock phrase or instances of a trope about a specific kind of moral dilemma. The description is also rambling and pretty hostile so it needs rewritten at the very least. Is this better:

The heroine has finally subdued the hordes of evil, thwarted the Doomsday plot, and subdued the big bad in one final showdown. But the villain couldn't make things simple and die in battle. Now he's helpless at the heroine's feet andů the heroine pauses to consider what sort of person it would make her if she chooses to kill the villain versus sparing him.

On the one hand, the villain may have proven himself a Complete Monster or done the hero great harm personally. But on the other, the average hero tends to take a dim view of killing the helpless. This could easily turn into a Jumping Off the Slippery Slope situation. Sometimes Being Good Sucks.

Contrast with Kill Him Already. Compare with Save the Villain and Sword over Head. Anti Heroes are exempt from all four. Compare/Contrast Strike Me Down with All of Your Hatred.

A subtrope of He Who Fights Monsters and Moral Dilemma. See If You Taunt Him, You Will Be Just Like Him for when the stakes involved in this situation are notably lower.

 4 nrjxll, Thu, 20th Sep '12 8:48:32 PM Relationship Status: Not war
I wouldn't use Complete Monster in there, as per the cleanup effort that's going on.

But otherwise, that's a much-improved description, although few things wouldn't be.

The main page is indeed hostile to this idea. The rewrite is more focused on the moral delimma: killing a helpless person vs sparing a villain.
 6 lu 127, Sun, 25th Nov '12 4:25:04 AM from the Forest of Thorns Relationship Status: Loves me...loves me not
Is there anything to do here?
 7 Meta Four, Sun, 25th Nov '12 11:38:50 AM from the house of bread and battle
Agreed that Star Valkyrie's writeup is an improvement over the current article.
 8 Septimus Heap, Sun, 9th Dec '12 5:41:35 AM from Zurich, Switzerland Relationship Status: Mu
A Wizard boy
Changed the description. Anything I missed?

 9 lu 127, Sun, 9th Dec '12 6:36:49 AM from the Forest of Thorns Relationship Status: Loves me...loves me not
Looks good.
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
Total posts: 9

TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from
Privacy Policy