Follow TV Tropes

Following

Not Tropeworthy: Short Titles

Go To

CaptainLhurgoyf Mah boi! from Hyrule Since: May, 2012
Mah boi!
#1: Aug 30th 2012 at 7:12:57 PM

I created this index when we still had our own search engine, because it only would take strings three letters or longer, so you couldn't look up works with two- or one-letter titles. Now that we're using a Google search, this requirement isn't there, I feel the index is no longer needed.

What does everyone think?

I wonder what's for dinner?
AceOfSevens Since: Feb, 2010
#2: Aug 30th 2012 at 10:52:46 PM

searches of a few characters now have the opposite problem. Instead of nothing, they bring up every page on the wiki. I was trying to find the page for W. a few days ago and gave up. That appears not to have a page for some reason, but I just searched for "x" and you have to go through many pages of results before you get to the actual work.

edited 30th Aug '12 10:54:34 PM by AceOfSevens

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#3: Aug 31st 2012 at 8:30:04 AM

Just checked, and it seems that except for really ordinary letters Google does a sufficient work by itself.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Routerie Since: Oct, 2011
#4: Aug 31st 2012 at 8:43:05 AM

Not trope worthy, but it's kind of a nifty index. I haven't seen this kind of list anywhere else.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#5: Sep 1st 2012 at 1:10:56 AM

I think it's an acceptable index.

It could possibly be seen as a trope, in that there are various reasons to give something a short name, though that may be a little too fuzzy.

Check out my fanfiction!
CaptainLhurgoyf Mah boi! from Hyrule Since: May, 2012
Mah boi!
#6: Sep 1st 2012 at 6:42:31 PM

I'm not saying it's a trope, there just wasn't a category that fit better. I'm only proposing we get rid of it because the Google site search makes it obsolete, and "not tropeworthy" sounded like the closest thing.

I wonder what's for dinner?
Antwan Ramblin' Mushroom from Washington Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: I LOVE THIS DOCTOR!
Ramblin' Mushroom
#7: Sep 1st 2012 at 9:59:30 PM

I don't think we should delete it. Yeah, we do have a Google search function, but it's still very useful to have. Besides, it's not being used as a trope itself, just as a special index, so it isn't doing any harm to the wiki.

burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#8: Sep 2nd 2012 at 10:50:17 AM

As has been said, Google searches can cause problems with really short names giving you an enormous amount of pages.

It doesn't help that Google brings up pages that don't exist, too.

AnotherDuck No, the other one. from Stockholm Since: Jul, 2012 Relationship Status: Mu
No, the other one.
#9: Sep 2nd 2012 at 1:53:05 PM

Can we call this a consensus to keep it, and if so, is there anything to do here?

Check out my fanfiction!
lu127 Paper Master from 異界 Since: Sep, 2011 Relationship Status: Crazy Cat Lady
#10: Oct 10th 2012 at 7:34:08 AM

Looks like we're okay with this.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
Add Post

Total posts: 10
Top