Follow TV Tropes

Following

EA Rumored for sale

Go To

stevebat Since: Nov, 2009
#1: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:27:04 PM

EA is reportedly looking to sell after several recent commercial failures. The question everyone wants to know is: What will it mean for the future of games? Having a Giant crash (Even if it is self caused) like this cannot be good for the market

I think it goes without mentioning that we do NOT want to turn this into a EA bashing thread Lord knows we have enough of those

Apocalypse: Dirge Of Swans.
miru Knouge forever!! Since: Jan, 2001
Knouge forever!!
#2: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:39:46 PM

Disney will buy them. Or Activision. Or Capcom.

I am completely, utterly, and thoroughly done with Sola Sonica and 2D
burnpsy Since: Sep, 2010
#3: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:40:28 PM

[up]But Activision itself is being sold off, so it can't buy EA.

edited 20th Aug '12 4:40:42 PM by burnpsy

unnoun Since: Jan, 2012
#4: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:41:14 PM

[up][up]...I actually hope that it would be Disney out of those three. If only because the other 2 would make EA worse if anything.

edited 20th Aug '12 4:41:32 PM by unnoun

Kostya from Everywhere Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#5: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:41:25 PM

So who could actually buy them? EA is one of the biggest companies out there so there's not a whole lot to pick. So far it would have to be one of the big three or...Ubisoft...maybe?

edited 20th Aug '12 4:41:49 PM by Kostya

KnownUnknown Since: Jan, 2001
#6: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:51:20 PM

Irony aside, this would be... interesting. EA falling would probably have a profound effect on the commercialism and status of the industry, at least stateside. Something would likely take its general place, however - probably Valve.

"The difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to make sense." - Tom Clancy, paraphrasing Mark Twain.
BadWolf21 The Fastest Man Alive Since: May, 2010
The Fastest Man Alive
#7: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:54:26 PM

I actually wouldn't mind if Ubisoft bought EA.

Kostya from Everywhere Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#8: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:55:51 PM

So what happens if one of the big three acquires EA? They'd be pretty much guaranteed to have a bunch of new exclusives to sell (at least a dozen, maybe almost two!). They'd also get exclusive rights to Mass Effect and The Sims which would probably be a nice boost.

edited 20th Aug '12 4:56:21 PM by Kostya

Cassie The armored raven from Malaysia, but where? Since: Feb, 2011
The armored raven
#9: Aug 20th 2012 at 4:55:51 PM

If EA goes indie, I'll be laughing. Not to bash them, but they really need to suffer by themselves instead of leeching out of buyers

What profit is it to a man, when he gains his money, but loses his internet? Anonymous 16:26 I believe...
Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#10: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:00:39 PM

I'd like to say, dear Athe, no, not Disney. From the perspective of copyright lay, Disney is the Devil. They're largely responsible for why copyright extends 75 years after the death of the creator.

OdieEsty Why would I write that? Since: Mar, 2012
Why would I write that?
#11: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:02:07 PM

[up]That's bad why?

Remember! Hyperbole is an exaggeration made for comedic effect, and shouldn't be taken literally!
Kostya from Everywhere Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#12: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:02:45 PM

[up]It's an absurdly long time and for major companies it's basically forever.

KuroBaraHime ☆♥☆ Since: Jan, 2011
☆♥☆
#13: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:03:37 PM

Let's not derail into copyright laws, but suffice to say, a lot of people have problems with it lasting so long for various reasons.

Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#14: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:04:41 PM

Also, based on that, I'd expect some nasty DRM from Disney.

unnoun Since: Jan, 2012
#15: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:04:52 PM

[up][up][up][up][up] True. I wasn't thinking about the copyright law perspective. Well, now I have no idea who EA should go to. Maybe it should be broken up, and all the different parts of it given to different people.

edited 20th Aug '12 5:05:11 PM by unnoun

Kostya from Everywhere Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#16: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:06:20 PM

As long as Microsoft doesn't get its hands on EA I'm fine.

I swear if Nintendo gets EA it would basically be the ultimate fuck you to the previous management.[lol]

OdieEsty Why would I write that? Since: Mar, 2012
Why would I write that?
#17: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:07:40 PM

But...but why is long copyright so bad? What's the downside to it?

Remember! Hyperbole is an exaggeration made for comedic effect, and shouldn't be taken literally!
Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#18: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:07:52 PM

Break 'em up and parcel 'em out.

[up]Stifles creativity by keeping things from functionally ever entering the public domain. Copyright is meant to give incentive to the content creator to come up with new things by giving him exclusive rights to his creation, but you might notice that dead men tend not to create things any more.

edited 20th Aug '12 5:09:24 PM by Balmung

OdieEsty Why would I write that? Since: Mar, 2012
Why would I write that?
#19: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:09:14 PM

So...why's that bad? Wouldn't that promote creativity by forcing people to create more original content?

Remember! Hyperbole is an exaggeration made for comedic effect, and shouldn't be taken literally!
Kostya from Everywhere Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#20: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:09:29 PM

[up][up][up]It means companies have possession of certain properties for far longer than they have any right to. The original creators frequently have no control over them anymore, it's just a corporate entity now. There's also the argument that if they didn't have their damn I Ps for so long they'd actually be forced to make some new stuff once in a while.

[up]How? If Disney can keep using Mickey Mouse why should they ever try and create another star?

edited 20th Aug '12 5:09:59 PM by Kostya

unnoun Since: Jan, 2012
#21: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:09:45 PM

[up][up][up][up] Well, there's no upside for starters.

Imagine if norse mythology was copyrighted. Or the music of Beethoven and Bach and Mozart. Or pretty much any story or work ever. Copyright is supposed to exist to protect the intellectual property rights of artists, not corporations.

edited 20th Aug '12 5:12:09 PM by unnoun

Balmung Since: Oct, 2011
#22: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:10:33 PM

Say someone wants to make a game based on The Lord Of The Rings. The books are in the public domain, but thanks to the movies, you'd need the film studio's permission for about as long as it will continue to be relevant.

Kostya from Everywhere Since: Apr, 2011 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#23: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:11:08 PM

This is getting off topic...

edit: I really do hope someone with sense buys EA.

edited 20th Aug '12 5:11:27 PM by Kostya

Nettacki Since: Jan, 2010
#24: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:11:25 PM

I say EA be split up to 3 big pieces, each going to a major console manufacturer (Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo). Just for the hell of it.

OdieEsty Why would I write that? Since: Mar, 2012
Why would I write that?
#25: Aug 20th 2012 at 5:11:37 PM

[up][up]Because people will get sick of it eventually? I mean people will only watch so much of a single thing. Honestly Mickey Mouse doesn't really star in anything anymore, he's just a mascot.

Remember! Hyperbole is an exaggeration made for comedic effect, and shouldn't be taken literally!

Total posts: 258
Top