I see the problem with the description, it is vague but I get the picture, but it does seem like a legitimate trope that I am opposed to cutting or merging.
The definition as I am interpreting it is "Awesomeness is a force that exists in-universe and not just a subjective view" (which "causes tangible physical harm to their enemies"). However, the definition of Awesomeness Is Volatile
is "Sufficient amounts of awesomeness causes explosions", which seems more like a Sub-Trope
than anything ("several examples of [Pure Awesomeness
] have a common element not seen in the other examples", i.e. explosions caused by overabundance, hence Awesomeness Is Volatile
The best solution I see, and the one I propose, is merely to rewrite Pure Awesomeness
to make it clearer. Even the Laconic version is unclear and makees it seem like someone who looks
And just in case you missed it
, the definition as I see it is "Awesomeness is a force that exists in-universe and not just a subjective view".
People say an image is worth a thousand words. One look at the Image Pickin' board will tell you this is bullshit.