Ambiguous Name: Plot With Porn

The No Such Thing As Notability page says that we cannot have porn. I know that it means Porn Without Plot and Excuse Plot with the excuse of porn are not allowed based on context and the situation we are in. However, other tropers may not and assume that the site also absolutely prohibits the works that qualify for this trope when in reality, works of such nature will be reviewed on a case by case basis. Before we have yet another semantics free-for-all on the Content Policy thread, we should rename this into something like Plot with Explicit Sex (probably something more catchy), so the definition of porn as it relates to this website is more clear.

EDIT: Nevermind. Considering that there's this quote on the No Such Thing As Notability

It shouldn't be an issue anymore.

edited 18th Apr '12 3:32:24 PM by encrypted12345

Full Battle Mode

Probably better to just delete the entire page in accordance with policy.

We are not deleting the entire page. It is not in violation of any policy.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.

EDIT: mod-ninja'd

I agree, though, that this should be renamed. I think that terms like Scenery Porn and Food Porn are also going to get renames.

What it could change to...

Plot With Sex? May Contain Sex?

edited 18th Apr '12 11:56:44 AM by ArcadesSabboth

Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.

"There's sex in it but that's not its whole point."

This doesn't seem like an actual trope.

I've seen this mentioned in some of the Wiki Talk threads. Are we really renaming Food Porn and Scenery Porn? I thought it was accepted that we're not denying the existence of pornography.

We're not just men of science, we're men of TROPE!

Renaming Food Porn and Scenery Porn seems a bit extreme. There has been no official announcement on those, so right now that's just a rumor.

This seems like a genre to me: a work that is a pornography, but has a strong enough plot that it can stand on its own without it.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.

Renaming Food Porn sounds silly. If there's anyone who thinks it refers to actual porn, then...what can I say.

"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer

No, we don't need to rename Food Porn or Scenery Porn or discuss it here - they use "porn" as a metaphor.

Porn with Plot is to me porn that has significant plot to it. But why rename?

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

I think May Contain Sex is kinda snappy...

But isn't this a pre-existing term? I know Porn Without Plot is, as a variant of Plot? What Plot?, but I wasn't sure about this one.

I'm pretty sure Porn with Plot is preexisting. Not so sure about Plot With Porn. It might be our own invention.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.

Like I said in the op, the No Such Thing As Notability page prohibited porn, and it's seems like Plot With Porn is out by the policy because it does in fact contain porn. I just wanted to make it more clear what that page meant by porn and keep the definition consistent throughout the wiki especially in that kind of borderline case.

edited 18th Apr '12 12:36:17 PM by encrypted12345

Full Battle Mode

As far as I'm aware, only pure porn and porn with an excuse plot is out. Porn with Plot is decided case by case, Plot With Porn is usually fine.

Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.

Why the difference between Porn with Plot or Plot With Porn?

And it's Porn Without Plot that we want to get rid of.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Okay, the nothing but porn part in the policy clears it up a lot.

Ratio of plot to porn

edited 18th Apr '12 12:43:25 PM by encrypted12345

Full Battle Mode

I apologize for repeating an unsubstantiated rumor. I thought I had read that it was going to happen.

How concerned should we be that works labeled Plot With Porn will be cutlisted or flagged mistakenly by folks who misunderstand the new policy? If it isn't a concern at all, renaming this may not truly be necessary.

edited 18th Apr '12 2:55:49 PM by ArcadesSabboth

Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.

So, ah, what Kaiser Mazoku said. There's not much of an actual trope here. It's like "explicit sex scenes exist, but there's plot". Not really a pattern or anything.

something

Considering that there's this quote on the No Such Thing As Notability now

It shouldn't be an issue anymore.

Full Battle Mode

I think we should swap this with the redirect Porn with Plot, if it's really necessary.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Wait, why is that a redirect in the first place? Elsewhere people are treating Plot With Porn and Porn with Plot as separate things.

My understanding is that Porn with Plot is mostly porn, with some basic, simple storyline thrown in to mix it up once in a while; but Plot With Porn is mostly a story, with porn scenes thrown in to spice it up. You can take the sex out of Plot With Porn and still have plot; but take the sex out of Porn with Plot and the plot kinda doesn't work anymore.

Lumping them together is just encouraging people to think they're the same, and want both to be axed.

Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.

So Plot With Porn is basically Gratuitous Sex Scene, isn't it?

Rhetorical, eh? ... Eight!

Maybe it should be split. It sounds like that from your definition, Plot with Porn is Plot with Excuse Porn while Porn With Plot is Plot where the porn is necessary to make the plot work.

edited 18th Apr '12 4:08:21 PM by encrypted12345

Full Battle Mode

Well that's how people were using the terms on the Content Policy Change thread.

Oppression anywhere is a threat to democracy everywhere.

I think in a lot of the stuff that's listed on the Plot With Porn page, the sex is neither the whole of the story nor gratuitous. The analogy I like to make is that a well-done Plot With Porn work uses arousal as a tool, just like a well-done horror story uses fear as a tool. (In this sense, Porn Without Plot is most directly analogous to generic splatter horror.)

Of course, I'm not sure how well this fits with the dictionary definition of porn. (However, it does match how the term "porn" is used on several websites, most obviously Literotica.)

Edit: Yes, this is coming from someone who's previously called horror intellectually bankrupt. I can at least recognize the craft involved.

edited 18th Apr '12 4:29:34 PM by feotakahari

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful

I wouldn't call Plot With Porn necessarily gratuitous. Usually, its just a story that doesn't fade to black or pan away when the characters start going at it. That's why I like May Contain Sex.