Nope, checked the history of the deleted page, confirms that the OFFICIAL DVD version has a no sex option.
edited 30th May '12 1:07:17 PM by Rpgingmaster
Ok, so I see Collar 6 was cut. Now, it's been a while since I read it straight through, but IIRC it is definately not porn(and NONE of the chars are under age or even look remotely like it). There are a few scenes of nudity, and of course the premise is about a world where BDSM is mainstream,but it doesn't make it porn, especially when there hasn't been any sex to this point (again, IIRC)
I would have noted that one but its already on the voting tool.
edited 30th May '12 1:07:49 PM by Shadis
Okay, just to recap:
- Batman XXX: Confirmed Bleached Underpants option on DVD version.
- Collar6: Arguments can be made it's not porn.
- Unlucky Busty Girl: Decent trope hampered by ill definiton.
.....honestly, I could see all three coming back in some form, and frankly, I'm keen on getting as many items on the chopping block back off, assuming we can find justifications like have been found for the above.
edited 30th May '12 1:15:01 PM by Rpgingmaster
I'm going to argue that Naughty Tentacles should be brought back,
While it is undeniably a borderline explicit trope, Naughty Tentacles is a culturally significant trope especially in Japan. Instead of playing it straight as a hentai, most non-henta media/anime (Beach Episode in Bleach, To-Love Ru, etc) just invoke the trope and poke fun of it - hence the cultural significance of the trope. I understand that Naughty Tentacles is the page that brought us trouble in the first place but please reconsider it. I totally agree to clean some of the straight hentai examples from Naughty Tentacles
edited 30th May '12 1:47:22 PM by mek4life
Nevermind. Got the threads mixed up.
edited 30th May '12 2:26:24 PM by strawberryflavored
Already beat you to the punch, sir.
It will most assuredly never come back under that name, and when/if it returns it will be a locked stub with no pictures or outbound links, and it will be renamed, bare minimum, but it has been discussed, and with some very careful forethought, serious discussions have taken place on the subject of reinstating it.
edited 30th May '12 1:49:32 PM by Rpgingmaster
This is the Page Restoration Petitions thread.
Okay, seriously, can we please stop talking about naughty tentacles? The petitions have been going on for pages and pages. We'll get to it when we get to it.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.Understood, sir.
edited 30th May '12 2:14:10 PM by FinalStarman
I'm not crazy, I just don't give a darn!Unlucky Busty Girl sounds like it would have to be chairs, but I understand that's beyond the purview of 5P.
The child is father to the man —OedipusI'm pretty sure it was chairs. Maybe somebody should start a TRS about it?
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.Are works solely being removed due to art style? That seems to be the sole problem with Katahane, as all the characters are above the age of consent. Other titles have been given the okay once it's determined to be a character design issue. If that's the rule for Kanokon and Sky Girls, why isn't it for Katahane? Please consider the idea that you may have jumped to conclusions.
I request that Katahane's page be restored.
~Cute and fluffy romance for all!~Actual age here is meaningless; P5 is cutting stuff based on apparent age. For example, if something has sex scenes with a character who is said to be 18, but actually looks 12, it's probably going to be cut.
/Refer to the Katahane thread below for the rationale behind the decision to cut, if you haven't done so yet. Bear in mind that while chronological age is a consideration (where appropriate), it isn't the only consideration.
edited 30th May '12 7:38:48 PM by Pyrite
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.@Ojamajo Lime Pie: Echoing what has been said in previous two posts, also adding this page that mods and The Fast One set up. It may clear up any misunderstandings you may have. See that last section in particular.
edited 30th May '12 7:49:18 PM by tdgoodrich1
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenYou know, I was wondering so did some checking into that game myself, and... I don't know, am I weird to think the characters don't look that young?
"So... the time has come for you to meet your demise..."Depends which you look at. Angelina, no. Belle and Waka*, yes.
Since I have no idea which one is which, I have no idea!
"So... the time has come for you to meet your demise..."Er, right. Angelina is the girl with long black hair that isn't completely flat, Belle is the wispy haired robot girl with a single wing on her back, Waka is some other girl who doesn't really stand out much.
Katahane has been cut. No need to continue discussing it.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.Not regarding Katahane, but we do get to appeal if we believe there is a basis not covered by the cut reasons right?
And notwithstanding the reason already being brought up in the thread, it wouldn't matter whether there had been a thread on it would it?
"Nullius addictus iurare in verba magistri, quo me cumque rapit tempestas, deferor hospes."Try to rephrase the question - I'm having trouble parsing it. Give me an actual example or something.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.
Is that actually true though? I've never watched Batman XXX but I know for a fact it's just a Batman-themed porno. If anything the bleached version might be a fan-edit, and I don't think we need a page for that.
I must say, it's deeply weird when something's fanworks are less pornographic than the source material.
What's precedent ever done for us?