Action scenes:

Total posts: [28]
26 MajorTom24th Mar 2012 09:29:47 AM , Relationship Status: Barbecuing
Eye'm the cutest!
Rules are good.

Detailed rules are bad.

As a hard and fast guideline that advice is far from perfect. Am I saying that you convey the specs in such a way that within the third line of its introduction you realize the ballistics of the round means it wobbles like a dreidel inside human flesh? No. But I am saying that you convey the specs of it over time to establish consistency. You can establish the thing doing whatever possibility you want at the same time frame. (After all if in your setting anything can literally do anything you have ultimate consistency even if it doesn't make sense in reality.)

For instance say I make a setting where I have a shotgun that can damage tanks and I establish that early on. To give it wiggle room in performance I apply it consistently. It can do damage even to 60 meter tall Humongous Mecha just like it can to tanks. You'd simply have to shoot it enough times. The number of shots needed may change since there's no hard and fast rule but the fact it can still do damage is what's being consistent.

That said consistency is merely a tool to aid in making a better work. That said plenty of good works have been done where the consistency was rather thin if present at all. It just becomes harder to do without it.
"Allah may guide their bullets, but Jesus helps those who aim down the sights."
27 nrjxll24th Mar 2012 02:37:04 PM , Relationship Status: Not war
The amount of detail on the "specs" that the author needs to know varies, I think.

The reader, on the other hand, never needs to know a lot of details on the specs.
28 feotakahari24th Mar 2012 03:20:41 PM from Looking out at the city
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
If you're writing about a weapon that actually exists, you have at least some obligation to have it do what it would do in real life. You have a bit more leeway if you're writing about a weapon that doesn't exist.
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.

Total posts: 28