has crowner
A pocketful of saudade.
This is factionalism at its worst. Madrugada's suggestion sounds fair, although I won't miss them if they're removed.
Can you imagine how the complainers would react though? I imagine it will be... amusing.
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.
It's easy, mmkay?
What ever happened to Lumpers Versus Splitters, anyways?
At first I didn't realize I needed all this stuff...
Ravenous Sophovore
They're still around, but their rivalry never has been as visible or vitriolic.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
A pocketful of saudade.
They're also more universal and, most importantly, they disagree on methods, not vision. So it's not as likely to invite vitriol.
The words above are to be read as if they are narrated by Morgan Freeman.
Do you think we should have a multi-prop crowner to see which proposition has the most support?
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
A Wizard boy
Maybe, but remember to make a Wiki Development crowner here rather than Page Action or similar ones.
Oh...I don't know how to make one of those. 
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
A Wizard boy
Made a blank crowner here
.
For reference, you need http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/crowner_create_subject.php?desc=<Crowner type>&subject=<Topic>, fill in the crowner type and the topic in the URL, and you should get to the create crowner page - I've linked them on my troper page for convenience*.
.
For reference, you need http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/crowner_create_subject.php?desc=<Crowner type>&subject=<Topic>, fill in the crowner type and the topic in the URL, and you should get to the create crowner page - I've linked them on my troper page for convenience*.
edited 27th Mar '12 8:14:40 AM by SeptimusHeap
Thanks! 
I have added four options which have been suggested so far. Now we'll need to have it hooked.
I have added four options which have been suggested so far. Now we'll need to have it hooked.
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
A Wizard boy
I already hollered to request hooking. I also added a note about mutually exclusive/non-exclusive options.
61 Fighteer27th Mar 2012 08:26:52 AM from the Time Vortex
, Relationship Status: Dancing with Captain Jack Harkness
Geronimo!
Hookah'ed. Wait, that may not be the proper tense construction... 
edited 27th Mar '12 8:27:05 AM by Fighteer
Already hooked! Mods are fast. And Fighteer's a ninja. Sca-ree.
I think Maddy's suggestion about consolidating them is the best option.
edited 27th Mar '12 8:28:58 AM by lu127
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
A Wizard boy
I disgree with cutting since no one has given reasons why cutting them is better than archiving or Madrugada's suggestion.
And now, people are putting the hostility back. Why?
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
In uffish thought
![[up]](http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png "[up]"){kind=icon}
I'm PM-ing Rose And Heather, who is the one who put stuff back.
The problem being that person is not the only one who did it.
edited 28th Mar '12 4:57:03 AM by lu127
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
In uffish thought
True; I didn't catch foxmccloud4387 for some reason.
edited 28th Mar '12 5:16:09 AM by Telcontar
68 32_Footsteps28th Mar 2012 05:18:09 AM from Just north of Arkham
, Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Think of the mooks!
I detect painful irony. The common complaint I see there is that the wiki is moving away from what it was... but all of that ridiculous complaining and bile is clearly against the stated goal of the wiki. Myopic fandom at its worst. I suppose it's true - you do end up becoming what you hate.
Seeing as those pages are about names, complaining about anything even though unrelated, is out of the question. Even if you espouse the FORKS philosophy, what does your opinion on the mods or Fast Eddie or gushing have anything to do with your belief on names? Methinks we need a lock.
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
Hammer of the Pervs
Cutting seems more attractive now, don't you think?
The weird thing is, I actually agree with the FORKS position in general. It's unfortunate that many of them seem to be immature, whiny shits.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.
It's a pig...
*
I think a cleanup and lock will suffice.
*
I think a cleanup and lock will suffice.
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
Hammer of the Pervs
Yes, he's very cute, and he'll also be made into pork chops, coppa, zampone, nduja, and all sorts of tasty things when he gets a lot bigger and not so cute.
I suppose clean and lock could work. Does that make the factions closed clubs? I certainly don't want to join any of them, just wondering.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.
In uffish thought
There's an option to clean, lock, and archive them, but none for just lock.
No, don't eat it!
If the current leading option passes, I think it goes without saying that comments will be removed, right?
What goes around, comes around
what goes up, must come down
what goes up, must come down
|
Wiki Development: Cutlery Factions Pages
27th Mar '12 8:10:28 AM |
 |
At issue:
Some of the cutlery pages have been shown to attract vitriol. What would be the best way to fix this?
Note: Not all options below are mutually exclusive, but some are. Please exercise judgment
