Follow TV Tropes

Following

Article Dumping: Writer's Block Edition

Go To

chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#52: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:13:10 PM

Wait, you mean that gosh-awful "interactive mini-quiz"?

USAF713 I changed accounts. from the United States Since: Sep, 2010
I changed accounts.
#53: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:14:19 PM

Oh. I put the story's name in. Also, I failed the first question. 0_o

I am now known as Flyboy.
feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#54: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:32:20 PM

Make sure your protagonist’s goals and motivations are strong, and that the conflict she’s up against is almost impossible to overcome. A woman who’s afraid of dogs because her friend was attacked as a child is too weak to keep a story going. However, if the character is terrified of dogs because she was attacked and nearly killed when she was younger, and now her job as a reporter requires her to go undercover at a dog mill or she’ll be fired, that’s conflict. Now, add that the meanest dog escapes and has the reporter’s daughter trapped against a wall.

Blech. Sometimes, there's something to be said for a quiet, understated conflict.

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Not war
#55: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:34:00 PM

[up][up]Like I said: gosh-awful. Previous opinions on it here include:

I thought it was excessively strict, and I disagreed with it in a lot of places—I gave up on it completely after it said not to have characters use niceties.

It's very, very rare I reject a quiz after just four questions. Looks like a weird fusion of a "writing for morons" quiz and someone's personal beliefs on what makes for good writing.

I only went through it for shits and giggles. At least it wasn't a "one question wrong and you fail" thing.

[up]Agreed. I always hate things that try and tell you there is One Right Way to write fiction. And that example practically reads as Stealth Parody.

edited 14th Dec '11 7:34:36 PM by nrjxll

chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#56: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:43:22 PM

[up][up] Would you mind if I quote you on a comment on that blog post?

USAF713 I changed accounts. from the United States Since: Sep, 2010
I changed accounts.
#57: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:45:41 PM

Bleh... I agreed with a lot of what they said. Some of the issues (for example, "does your fight scene involve 4+ combatants?" "why yes, it's a war story—aw, dammit!") were because it seemed more geared towards fantasy than general fiction, and of them I simply disagree with them as to what is reasonably acceptable and what is not.

One question I got wrong because I totally misunderstood the answer. [lol]

I am now known as Flyboy.
feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#58: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:46:08 PM

^^ Go ahead. I'll take it as a compliment.

edited 14th Dec '11 7:46:16 PM by feotakahari

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#59: Dec 14th 2011 at 7:53:13 PM

[up][up] More like superhero fiction. Having more than four superheroes fighting in one scene, especially with their different skill set, is prone to slowly down the pacing.

chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#60: Dec 15th 2011 at 4:58:22 AM

I'm dealing with the first half while I have plenty of time:

Thursday:

edited 15th Dec '11 2:59:38 PM by chihuahua0

feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#61: Dec 15th 2011 at 4:04:19 PM

A post on magic systems, which struck me as surprisingly similar to how I myself design such systems.

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#62: Dec 19th 2011 at 2:09:15 PM

Monday:

chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#65: Dec 22nd 2011 at 7:55:26 AM

Thursday:

edited 22nd Dec '11 9:40:56 PM by chihuahua0

JHM Apparition in the Woods from Niemandswasser Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: Hounds of love are hunting
Apparition in the Woods
#66: Dec 22nd 2011 at 3:47:38 PM

[up] Always preferred the look of italics in modern text, though in the absence of that option—or for greater differentiation of, say, work titles and subject emphasis—a tasteful use of underlining can be extremely effective, especially in more archaic fonts or typefaces.

Bolding is a different matter, to be exclusively used for intense emphasis and definitive separate statements. Or so I feel.

I'll hide your name inside a word and paint your eyes with false perception.
chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#71: Jan 16th 2012 at 8:20:35 AM

New week!

Monday:

edited 16th Jan '12 8:44:08 AM by chihuahua0

feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#73: Jan 17th 2012 at 3:05:37 PM

I'll comment on a few, in rough chronological order:

1. The one about "mighty villains" makes me wonder. There was an essay I read a while ago that referenced an old complaint about how The Lord Of The Rings could have been over with much more quickly if the main characters had acted intelligently (I forget exactly how.) It then referenced a story that did have the main characters take the intelligent route to quickly dispose of all villains, with the conflict instead arising from intractable societal issues. I don't go quite as in-depth as all that, but I do have a tendency to end battles quickly with either a victory or a defeat, and to have the story be about the journey to those battles rather than the battles themselves.

2. The adverbs one from Tuesday interests me, if only because the author didn't do the research:

I mean, I can’t see a painter always omitting a specific group of colors from her palette

Even today, there are painters who refuse to use black paint, or any shade created by mixing black paint with other paints. (I think it's ridiculous, for much the same reason I think adverbs are a useful tool, but there you have it.)

3. Hmm . . . I guess I don't actually have a 3. (I think the "seek and destroy" posts are stupid, but they're not stupid in a way that's educational to discuss rather than ignore.)

edited 17th Jan '12 6:10:47 PM by feotakahari

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
chihuahua0 Since: Jul, 2010
#74: Jan 17th 2012 at 4:51:16 PM

Had you read the Thursday article on adverbs? I added the adverbs one on Tuesday after the fact simply because those two posts take opposite sides of the same issue.

However, the Search and Destroy posts have a point. While you don't have to oblivate every word on that list (like that and was), usually removing cases strengthens the prose.

feotakahari Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer from Looking out at the city Since: Sep, 2009
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
#75: Jan 17th 2012 at 6:14:41 PM

@Ghostwriter Dad's adverbs article: In general, Ghostwriter Dad seems like a bit of a hack. I can't argue with his business advice, and I won't argue with anything he says about how to mimic other writers, but a lot of his advice seems destructive to finding your own narrative voice (which, while not necessarily the thing that will make you money, is probably the thing that will make writing more fun than doing other work for better pay.)

edited 17th Jan '12 6:15:03 PM by feotakahari

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful

Total posts: 648
Top