Good question...I'm not exactly sure what we should do.
Early this morning some troll went around trying to convince people to nuke all of the Hiimdaisy images fron the tropepages, for some reason or another, so it probably caught Eddie's attention for that reason. And while I can understand the reason of the pull, I dont' think it was a good idea to take such an action in response to trolling. That sets a dangerous precedent, if you catch my drift. With that said, we can simply see if a better pic can be found (chief Wiggum from The Simpsons comes to mind), or maybe just do as you suggest and vote the HID image back.
"We are not a stuffy encyclopedic wiki. We're a buttload more informal".Yeah, I saw him. Still don't know why he had a grudge against Peachi.
Motion to Restore Image
Shows the trope well. Alt account of Angeldog 2437.Support motion
Believe me, my actions are not directed by a troll. The precedent being set is nobody gives a fuck what a troll says one way or the other. We are certainly not hanging on to something that sucks because a troll doesn't like it.
I pulled the image because it sucked. The linked discussion was short and didn't have any case made for the image at all. Seriously, five votes total? Not indicative of anything at all.
Don't put that crap back in. It's useless.
edited 15th Oct '11 2:13:42 PM by FastEddie
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyWhile I do belive you, Eddie, I still think that the timing for those pics to be taken down was not the happiest. This is just a suggestion, but maybe next time it would be better to just take a note about it and wait for the trollstorm to pass before springing into action.
About the pic itself... I've seen crappier images. At least it's not as bad as the one for Relationship Values, as this one doesn't directly show the trope but at least discusses it... But yeah, I do agree that we can do better. As I said earlier, The Simpsons could be a good place to start. If noting we could always keep the HID one up until something better is found.
edited 15th Oct '11 2:30:14 PM by plenum
"We are not a stuffy encyclopedic wiki. We're a buttload more informal".The Simpsons is a good place to start, but I also like the Hiimdaisy pic.
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.I agree with plenum: May be a valid action, but really bad timing to do it with no explanation.
An Ear Worm is like a Rickroll: It is never going to give you up.The image technically works, but I think it would work just as well as a page quote; none of the non-speech bubble part of the image really demonstrates much, it's just a guy sitting at table; he doesn't look like a cop or anything.
Also, I'm just going to say that while Eddie's action was appropriate, leaving a note explaining what happened would have saved some confusion.
edited 15th Oct '11 5:34:11 PM by JapaneseTeeth
Reaction Image RepositoryPerhaps we could make the previous a 2-3 parter? One with the 18th and 19th panels here◊ (click to make bigger) and the previous image?
Yeah, that's true. Maybe a slightly more descriptive edit note?
edited 15th Oct '11 5:39:19 PM by Bookyangel2438
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.No dude, the solution is not more of that strip.
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyOh ok.
Anyone have any suggestions?
edited 15th Oct '11 5:45:10 PM by Bookyangel2438
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.Good God, did that comic hurt to read.
Well, do we want to go with one of the other pics that was in the previous crowner, put the old pic back up, or try to find something completely different?
Didn't care for the humor at all.
Oh.
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.I'd like to put the old picture back up. If anything, we could edit the image so it only showed the fact that Dojima is portrayed as a crappy cop.
VINYL SCRATCH 私はあなたを永遠に愛をNope.
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyBut why? Any specific reason?
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.Exactly what I was going to say. He hasn't provided any good reason as to why the image shouldn't be picked if, for no other reason, he doesn't like it or the strip it's associated with.
VINYL SCRATCH 私はあなたを永遠に愛をIIRC, isn't that a no-no here (I could be wrong, I remember something about this I think)? Let me check...
I think this counts, from here:
The following are NOT valid reasons to start a thread:
- Not liking the art style.
- Claiming that a particular work is overrepresented.
- Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner. Repeatedly doing this ("griefing") is grounds for an edit ban.
I think No. 1 might count.
So, does anyone have any good possible replacement images?
edited 15th Oct '11 11:34:13 PM by Bookyangel2438
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.Chief Wiggum doing something really stupid?◊ Caption along the line of "If he's not careful, along with the dounts, he'll end up eating his gun too".
There also was an episode in which he was in his office playing Draughts with a dog... Can't remember which one though.
edited 16th Oct '11 3:22:54 AM by plenum
"We are not a stuffy encyclopedic wiki. We're a buttload more informal".
So, Fast Eddie removed the image for Police Are Useless, saying that "Five vote crowner not good enough." on Oct 15th.
So, what should be done? Re-Vote?
Old Image: