TV Tropes Org

Forums

search forum titles
google site search
Total posts: [29]  1
2

Why do stories need an Aesop?:

 26 Night, Sun, 9th Oct '11 2:50:08 PM from PSNS Intrepid Relationship Status: Drift compatible
Who you are does not matter.
[up]If you're a bad writer, perhaps.

Part of learning the craft is learning not to do that; learning to recognize and correct for your prejudices.

There are aesops running around in my stories, intentional ones; some of them are reflective of me, incidentally. Some of them aren't.

edited 9th Oct '11 2:51:22 PM by Night

"Let us look less to the sky to see what might fall; rather, let us look to each other...and rise."
 27 nrjxll, Sun, 9th Oct '11 2:56:01 PM Relationship Status: Not war
Additionally, even if you aren't able to overcome your prejudices entirely, simply being aware of them can help your work avoid becoming an Author Tract. For instance, I have a frothing-at-the-mouth hatred for Science Is Bad and other "primitivist" ideals that is probably too deeply rooted in my personality to overcome. Therefore, I will never include any sort of Evil Luddite antagonist or the like in any of my works, as I would be unable to treat them as anything other then an unsympathetic strawman.

I also don't see where the fact that some readers might read an aesop into your works even if you didn't intend one comes into this at all. I have never found the "some Viewers Are Morons, so you should tailor the entire work to their level" argument terribly convincing for anything other then economic reasons, which I don't see being much of a problem here.

 28 feotakahari, Sun, 9th Oct '11 4:20:09 PM from Looking out at the city
Fuzzy Orange Doomsayer
For instance, I have a frothing-at-the-mouth hatred for Science Is Bad and other "primitivist" ideals that is probably too deeply rooted in my personality to overcome. Therefore, I will never include any sort of Evil Luddite antagonist or the like in any of my works, as I would be unable to treat them as anything other then an unsympathetic strawman.

I can't speak for you, but I've found that I can write characters I disagree with if I portray why they think differently than I do. (In one of my current projects, the female lead argues The Evils of Free Will, and the male lead realizes that her belief in it is a direct result of the traits he admires in her. I've probably tipped my hand that I agree with the male lead, but I give them both time to make their arguments, and I think my story will have wider appeal because of it.)

edited 9th Oct '11 4:21:01 PM by feotakahari

That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful
 29 nrjxll, Sun, 9th Oct '11 4:55:20 PM Relationship Status: Not war
[up]As I was saying, there's a difference between disagreeing with something and being unshakably prejudiced against it. I can write plenty of characters I disagree with, but in that particular case, the disagreement is so fundamental that I strongly doubt I can ever overcome it - the point is that, by being aware of it, I know not to use those particular kinds of characters in my works.

The system doesn't know you right now, so no post button for you.
You need to Get Known to get one of those.
Total posts: 29
 1
2


TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy