No longer a forum herald
And I bet these studies totally took culture and upbringing into account as well.
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
Any links?
Something about this seems sketchy, so I'm calling bullshit on this.
I'll even sound the Bullshit Foghorn.
I changed accounts.
~hears the bullshit foghorn~
Well. No source. Unlikely to have taken sociology into account. And... well... a ridiculous idea to start with, but that's personal incredulity.
I am now known as Flyboy.
Phrenology that works? An offshoot thereof? I demand evidence that would convince a jury.
What a coincidence, I was just about to make a thread about 19th century physiognomy too!
And better than thy stroke; why swellest thou then?
Wandering Student ಠ_ಠ
who sounded the bullshit foghorn?
>reads<
well, I wouldn't be surprised if it was the the National Policy Institute.
I actually learned this from personality psychology just today from the professor himself, so I'm pretty sure it's not fake.
With claims like that, though, you really should find some sources OP.
Apparently there are human configuration models that can predict certain personality traits (conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness, neuroticism, extraversion) in different faces. Strangely enough, conscientiousness is harder to find in women facial configurations while agreeableness and openness in men (I think) is difficult to find. According to several studies the hormones that lead men to develope more masculine traits can make them more disagreeable and antisocial, while more feminine faces are associated with neuroticism