Thanks a lot! now to answer your questions
are you volunteering to moderate this system?
If nessesary yes. But my idea is a system that functions with the less (if any)amount of moderation possible
Because it sounds complicated;
Not really, don't worry.It looks complicated for all the subrules put to stop abuse. It's just pur capitalistic system simplified. It's basically buying/spending
like buying a candy bar.
Are you going to retroactively add up peoples' totals?
I am thinkig on either relying on honesty or moderating the totals in a google document for public acsses and closed to edition except for a few trusted people.
Are you going to count things reviewed elsewhere?
Nope, that would hurt the system unfortunately
. This could be easily abused.Only site reviews.
How are you going to penalize people who break the rules? Etc.
I want to rely if possible in honesty.If not we may need to rely on arbiters
Minor offenses lose credits (ex lying in the amount of credits). Major offenders/people with no credits get ignored until they pay pack their right to post again. Example 25 credits
edited 17th Aug '11 10:54:42 AM by FallenLegend