Follow TV Tropes

Following

Example Sectionectomy?: Fanon Discontinuity

Go To

Prfnoff Since: Jan, 2001
#51: Aug 13th 2011 at 11:39:18 AM

I was paying attention to the crowner, but consensus says I didn't. Apparently I'm not supposed to speak for myself, let alone anyone else.

TriggerLoaded $50 a day, plus expenses from Canada, eh? Since: Oct, 2011 Relationship Status: Healthy, deeply-felt respect for this here Shotgun
$50 a day, plus expenses
#52: Aug 13th 2011 at 12:14:59 PM

If you paid attention to the crowner, then why did you do the action that wasn't the highest voted?

Don't take life too seriously. It's only a temporary situation.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#53: Aug 13th 2011 at 12:22:49 PM

You don't act on the basis of the crowner until the crowner is called and a winning option is declared.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#55: Oct 7th 2011 at 8:25:21 PM

This is going no where. Can we lock it?

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#56: Oct 7th 2011 at 8:28:45 PM

It appears to have consensus for an example sectionectomy.

In this situation, do we put all the sub pages onto the cutlist?

edited 7th Oct '11 8:29:33 PM by Arha

nuclearneo577 from My computer. Since: Dec, 2009
#57: Oct 7th 2011 at 8:36:26 PM

[up]No, a 1.55 ratio is not a high enough consensus for an Example Sectionectomy.

edited 7th Oct '11 8:36:45 PM by nuclearneo577

Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#58: Oct 7th 2011 at 8:38:57 PM

This is a page action crowner, it does not need 2:1. It beat every other option.

Bookyangel2438 from New York City Since: Jul, 2011
#59: Oct 7th 2011 at 8:52:56 PM

Against Sections being cut.

Um, why should the examples be cut anyways? smile

Alt account of Angeldog 2437.
Arha Since: Jan, 2010
#60: Oct 7th 2011 at 8:58:00 PM

Because they serve no purpose, lead to flame wars and are added too easily. I could say I declare, I don't know, the third season of Star Trek TNG discontinuity and put it on the page if I wanted to. Why? Doesn't matter.

SilentReverence adopting kitteh from 3 tiles right 1 tile up Since: Jan, 2010
adopting kitteh
#61: Oct 7th 2011 at 9:50:34 PM

And besides if there are notable fanon discontinuities into the fandom of a work then they go in that work or franchise (YMMV) page anyway, so it's kinda useless to have them at best repeated here.

EDIT: duh, left my opinion here but forgot to vote...

edited 7th Oct '11 10:07:43 PM by SilentReverence

Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#62: Oct 8th 2011 at 2:24:13 AM

Crowner called : No clear consensus to do an Example Sectionectomy. The final tally was +14 (yeas:35 nays:21) 1.67 : 1 for "Example Sectionectomy: There is no point in documenting every instance of this phenomenon and it simply turns into Flame Bait."

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Bookyangel2438 from New York City Since: Jul, 2011
#63: Oct 8th 2011 at 6:18:37 AM

[up]Oh, that's cool. smile

So... now what?

Alt account of Angeldog 2437.
Madrugada Zzzzzzzzzz Since: Jan, 2001 Relationship Status: In season
Zzzzzzzzzz
#64: Oct 8th 2011 at 6:24:57 AM

Clean out the obviously bad examples, check the wicks to clear out bad wicks.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.
Add Post

PageAction: FanonDiscontinuity
1st Aug '11 8:37:48 AM

Crown Description:

What would be the best way to fix the page?

Total posts: 64
Top