Not An Example. (more evidence this trope needs a rename.)
Still don't see a big issue I mean we have pics of bathing suits all over but not allow something that is less revealing? Or Bloomers vs panties.
Does anyone have the Hayate No Gotoku DV Ds? All Shout Outs were censored in the first season and removed on the DV Ds I only have the censored version.
edited 4th May '11 11:52:07 AM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!The point is, would you feel comfortable about your boss seeing you looking at that picture? Like I said, gut feeling here.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"It honestly seems fine to me it's just a girl playing Wii Sports.
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Then why is it an example of Too Hot for TV, and not, say, Panty Shot?
My point is that any image suitable for this trope, by definition, is NSFW.
edited 4th May '11 12:07:09 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Because it was a marketing ploy they over censored most of the series (each girl got a specific animal as their censor) but blatantly left the opening and ending alone which has tons of them. Rosario Vampire did the same a while back.
The Setiokai Yakuindomo ones are not bad at all as well.
edited 4th May '11 12:11:21 PM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Which means you have to be familiar with the series to get why it's an example, which is a violation of the guidelines.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Except there is nothing there.. It's just pointless censoring removed in the DVD which makes it this trope.
edited 4th May '11 12:13:56 PM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Which is therefore not an example of this trope.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Huh? It's removed in the DVD which makes it this trope.
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
Probably not the trope either?
edited 4th May '11 12:18:51 PM by blackcat
This trope is "Whatever that was censored for Tv, was uncensored on DVD"
edited 4th May '11 12:25:05 PM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!- Visual Aid: Unlike Works, page images for trope pages are there to help explain the trope, not provide an example above the example line.
- A good image needs little to no explanation: following the previous, a good image should be able to stand on its own without a caption. A caption can provide further insight, but it's best if the image can stand on its own.
- How can I tell if it's a good picture if I'm very familiar with the work? Ask yourself "If I had no exposure to the source work, would this image still make sense to me?". If you're not sure about the answer, go ask in Image Pickin'- there are bound to be a few people who wouldn't know it from a hole in the ground who can give you some perspective.
This is why I don't think an image will work for this trope.
edited 4th May '11 12:26:49 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Stamp a TV and a DVD label on each pic and paste them together like this pic and done.
edited 4th May '11 12:49:32 PM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Whilee the images currently in the crowner are all questionable in whether they're NSFW or not, the discussion is ongoing. I've unlocked the thread, buut locked and unhooked the crowner. If we get more suggestions that aren't NSFW, we can make a new crowner.
...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.There are SFW options in the crowner. In fact, most of it was. Actually, these options were chosen because they are the most SFW options we got. Everything from post 7 is very tasteful and the huge censor bar in the leading image keeps it from being NSFW. The only questionable image are the dildos.
Plese, explain how they could be even 'questionably' NSFW, because I am not seeing.
(The Onii Koto image is also 'questionably' NSFW, I give that)
edited 4th May '11 4:40:22 PM by Heatth
I dunno, the more I think about it, the more I think this one might be better left without a pic.
We don't need an image on this one.
Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
In real TV during a tennis match it isn't a freeze frame directing the gaze to the panty shot.
Isn't there a censored image of Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction somewhere?