35 years ago, on this day, Josip Broz Tito passed away.
edited 4th May '15 10:43:04 AM by Quag15
¡VIVA EMPERADOR MAXIMIL- *is shot*
edited 4th May '15 9:20:08 PM by SantosLHalper
Halper's Law: as the length of an online discussion of minority groups increases, the probability of "SJW" or variations being used = 1.So I kept hearing a lot about The Hundred and Sixteen Years War and it came to me:
Who actually won the war?
So I looked up Wikipedia, and in the three separate wars, England won the first war, but France won the other two.
So...I guess it can be said that France won the Hundred Years War?
edited 5th May '15 11:07:04 AM by dRoy
I'm a (socialist) professional writer serializing a WWII alternate history webnovel.Considering how the dynastic question got solved and how much territory France recovered from England and took away from the Burgundians... Yeah, they won.
Ah.
For some reason, I was under impression that England did. Huh.
edited 5th May '15 11:12:05 AM by dRoy
I'm a (socialist) professional writer serializing a WWII alternate history webnovel.The main part of it that England won was the Glyndwr Rising which returned English control of Wales back to England.
Remember though that it did happen in periods, and some of the earlier successes happened in England's favour.
Edit: TVT hates some of the characters I was using.
edited 5th May '15 11:17:13 AM by RatherRandomRachel
"Did you expect somebody else?"England won because they burned the witch! But then France got her sainted so they won!
"What a century this week has been." - Seung Min KimHoly does have stat advantage against Evil types.
I'm a (socialist) professional writer serializing a WWII alternate history webnovel.Video games tell me that the witch they burned was actually an imposter, while the real one was a Magical Girl who battled demons.
But more seriously, yeah, the French won, given that they kept the crowns separate and reclaimed almost all of their land that had been in English hands (as I recall, everything but Calais). And then, before the century was out, seized control of Burgundy's lands (except for the part the Habsburgs took).
wut
It's a reference to this.
Yep, and I actually have that one.
There's also the fact that Wales as a nation was basically ruled over by many Fiefdoms and various Welsh rulers who in many cases joined Owain Glyndwr in rebellion, but a few stuck with England.note
Glyndwr basically told the King of France and the Pope in Avignon that he would swear Welsh alligience to France and against the Pope in Rome, but that didn't much help matters. By that time, the rebellion was basically over and those Welsh lords who retained loyalty to the English crown were rewarded, at the cost of their fellow Welshmen.
"Did you expect somebody else?"why japan
Because it was cool.
Whether you agree that it was is another matter.
edited 5th May '15 1:00:39 PM by Balmung
Glyndwr basically told the King of France and the Pope in Avignon that he would swear Welsh alligience to France and against the Pope in Rome, but that didn't much help matters. By that time, the rebellion was basically over and those Welsh lords who retained loyalty to the English crown were rewarded, at the cost of their fellow Welshmen.
That must have sucked (and it still sucks, in a way). Then again, the body of Llywelyn ap Gruffudd was already cold by then, and the Welsh didn't really had a rallying figure on the same level capable of attracting most or all the fiefdoms.
edited 5th May '15 1:16:10 PM by Quag15
I haven't gone that far in that game (yet). lol
edited 5th May '15 6:20:38 PM by entropy13
I'm reading this because it's interesting. I think. Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot, over.As the river rises: Cahokia's emergence and decline linked to Mississippi River flooding: "As with rivers, civilizations across the world rise and fall. Sometimes, the rise and fall of rivers has something to do with it. At Cahokia, the largest prehistoric settlement in the Americas north of Mexico, new evidence suggests that major flood events in the Mississippi River valley are tied to the cultural center's emergence and ultimately, to its decline."
Eating a Vanilluxe will give you frostbite.You guys all know about the laws of hospitality.
So it got me wondering; what if you CAN'T afford food nor safety for your guest? Is it okay to simply politely refuse to have someone as a guest, or would that make people mock you for being too poor?
I'm a (socialist) professional writer serializing a WWII alternate history webnovel.That depends on where you are - in some places it's often simply been that you allow them to stay because rest is the most important part.
"Did you expect somebody else?"Polite trading with early Vikings? Scandinavian trade 'triggered' the Viking Age: "Archaeologists suggest that the dawn of the Viking Age may have been much earlier — and less violent — than previously believed. The new study shows that the early Vikings from Norway had access to large quantities of reindeer antlers and sold them to craftworkers in Southern Scandinavia."
Eating a Vanilluxe will give you frostbite.@dRoy: Wait, you thought England won the Hundred Years War? That's kinda interesting. Did you believe that the English king successfully took the French throne? When did you think France broke free of England, then?
It was more the other way around; for example, Norman French was the language of the English Court until the 15th century and at least at first, the French (Norman) holdings were the more important. What became England was a Remnant, a Vestigial Empire of much larger holdings on the continent, as it were.
It certainly wasn't anything like the American Revolution, that is certain.
edited 8th May '15 11:51:44 AM by Greenmantle
Keep Rolling OnI was talking to a guy who (previously) thought the English won the Hundred Years War.
edited 8th May '15 1:27:50 PM by Druplesnubb
Speaking of WWII, what happened to Wilhelm Hoffman anyways?