Unlock: Talk.Who Would Win

This page has been locked, presumably because it hit the upperbound length for allowed characters. This is a fun page, so it would be nice if it were unlocked so people could add to it again.

If the length of the page is an issue, I can move the content to a new Who Would Win archive and rewrite the rules so that entries are by the first alphabetically listed series involved (as opposed to "new entries at the top") so as to cut down on duplication.

See you in the discussion pages.

I think it is locked  ^*

because the talk pages were our de facto fora before the actual fora and they are now defunct.

Be that as it may, this page was active right up until it was locked. If this page was locked because the topic was moved to the forum, then this is information that should be on the page somewhere.

See you in the discussion pages.

Ai.

So what's the status?

To be seen, stand up To be heard, speak up To be appreciated, shut up

I'd say this should continue, but in the fora.

Infinite Tree: an experimental story

Or maybe make it a page like YKTS?

"And as long as a sack of shit is not a good thing to be, chivalry will never die."

Or..I dunno..make a 2nd page?

Should the forum thread be linked to on the top of the page?

In which page?

there need'st to be a way to at least discuss.

We could try splitting...but I doubt that would work.

"badass" doesn't anything in after used end fail be fine.

I support the "separate thread on forum" idea.

<Mod Hat ON>

You guys do realize that you don't need permission to make a forum thread, don't you?

<Mod Hat OFF>

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.

If you look at the format of something like Ask The Tropers, you can see how the 'who would win' thing would fit in pretty nicely. The first post would be the 'versus'. If anyone wants to argue it, their stuff goes in the replies.

If that works for you guys, I could set up a Who Would Win section like that fairly quickly.

edited 3rd Apr '11 7:27:32 AM by FastEddie

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty

Sounds like a good plan.

Regulated fun - the best kind! I don't make the rules, just enforce them with an iron fist.

Might it be better to just make a new section of the forum?

Ukrainian Red Cross

I think there are people who are allergic to forums. Only one fifth of our contributors ever post in the forums. This indicates ... something. Not sure what. You can at least conclude there might be a better way to connect with 4/5 of the editors.

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty

I think a section in the vein of Ask The Tropers is a good idea.

Bump.

Agatha Hederodyne vs. Florence Ambrose: There is a scrapyard. Who would repair more in a given time (not accounting on The Madness Place and Dingbots)?

edited 7th May '11 1:46:30 AM by Tambov333

Please join these multinational petitions against ACTA. Sign up now. Every voice counts.

Agatha. She's got Garage Science going on, while Florence has to work with actual tools besides a screwdriver and a wrench.

Fight smart, not fair.

I'd say Florence. Agatha would start to work on something, then decide that she can make it Bigger! Stronger! FASTER! and go back and change it. Florence would methodically repair something, then move on to something else. Also, there's no evidence that Agatha knows anything about duct tape.

...if you don’t love you’re dead, and if you do, they’ll kill you for it.

Theoretically, we should just create a large-size subwiki with a whole system of classifications, like *Completely Random* *Battle Of The Memes* *In-Genre Conflict* or even *Who Would (FINALLY) Win: Flame War/Edit War Edition * for the edit wars.

World Creation Project. Check it out.

Well, there's a subwiki for Playing With Tropes, why not an equally huge subwiki of MASSIVE size, or just an overbloated index cataloging the massive saturation of Who Would Win pages.

World Creation Project. Check it out.