Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / TheBlackCauldron

Go To

OR

Added: 501

Removed: 1468

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
this feels like They Wasted A Perfectly Good Character, he's already listed under Ensemble Darkhorse, and it spends far too much time comparing him to other characters—like, this gives a token nod to the fact that people generally like the Horned King and then spends the rest of the entry complaining about him


* BaseBreakingCharacter: The Horned King. Some argue he's one of the best villains ever, because of how monstrous and unhumorous he is in a DarkerAndEdgier film. Others argue it's ''because'' of those reasons, that make him one of the worst Disney villains ever, and they're not wrong when you study his character. He was an unstoppable warrior in the books, where only [[AchillesHeel his true name]] could stop his rampage. Here he's an AdaptationalWimp who compensates by being bombastically scary. But besides getting angry and strangling Creeper, he doesn't get [[OrcusOnHisThrone to do anything]] for the majority of the film. He has no real power of his own, and is carried by either his minions or the GreaterScopeVillain's DyingCurse. Fans argue he left a lasting impression to inspire the Lich for ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'', but likewise point out that character being an indefinable EldritchAbomination was a ''true'' menace to all life; whereas the Horned King was underdeveloped because has no backstory, and it's never explained why he looks undead. Some think he's memorable, though reviewers have refuted that he's nowhere near as iconic as [[Franchise/MastersOfTheUniverse Skeletor]]. Even Hexxus' fiery skeletal form from ''[[WesternAnimation/FernGullyTheLastRainforest Fern Gully]]'', of all things, is more [[OneWingedAngel terrifying]] than him. Both sides can agree though, he had a disrespectfully [[AntiClimax anticlimactic send off]].


Added DiffLines:

* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Despite his incredibly intimidating performance, design, and direction, the Horned King feels very visibly underutilized. We're given little explanation as to who he is, what he is, what he wants, and what his abilities are, and he rarely gets to stretch his legs as a villain. Though this was likely intended to build suspense and mystery, the fact that he doesn't do anything that couldn't be done by a regular person causes a lot of that buildup to go to waste.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The film being rated PG was a big deal in its time, and seen as a huge sign of its attempts to be DarkerAndEdgier. Since TheNewTens, [[AvoidTheDreadedGRating it has been the standard rating for big-budget animated films]].

to:

** The film being rated PG was a big deal in its time, and seen as a huge sign of its attempts to be DarkerAndEdgier. Since TheNewTens, [[AvoidTheDreadedGRating it has been the standard rating for big-budget animated films]]. Of course, the film is still a fair bit nastier than a lot of its successors--when the film was in production, the next highest rating above PG was R, and PG films were seen as "anything that you wouldn't necessarily ''ban'' a kid from being able to watch".

Added: 770

Changed: 5

Removed: 770

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixing trope ordering and character misnaming


* BaseBreakingCharacter: The Horned King. Some argue he's one of the best villains ever, because of how monstrous and unhumorous he is in a DarkerAndEdgier film. Others argue it's ''because'' of those reasons, that make him one of the worst Disney villains ever, and they're not wrong when you study his character. He was an unstoppable warrior in the books, where only [[AchillesHeel his true name]] could stop his rampage. Here he's an AdaptationalWimp who compensates by being bombastically scary. But besides getting angry and strangling Creeper, he doesn't get [[OrcusOnHisThrone to do anything]] for the majority of the film. He has no real power of his own, and is carried by either his minions or the GreaterScopeVillain's DyingCurse. Fans argue he left a lasting impression to inspire the Lich King for ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'', but likewise point out that character being an indefinable EldritchAbomination was a ''true'' menace to all life; whereas the Horned King was underdeveloped because has no backstory, and it's never explained why he looks undead. Some think he's memorable, though reviewers have refuted that he's nowhere near as iconic as [[Franchise/MastersOfTheUniverse Skeletor]]. Even Hexxus' fiery skeletal form from ''[[WesternAnimation/FernGullyTheLastRainforest Fern Gully]]'', of all things, is more [[OneWingedAngel terrifying]] than him. Both sides can agree though, he had a disrespectfully [[AntiClimax anticlimactic send off]].

to:

* BaseBreakingCharacter: The Horned King. Some argue he's one of the best villains ever, because of how monstrous and unhumorous he is in a DarkerAndEdgier film. Others argue it's ''because'' of those reasons, that make him one of the worst Disney villains ever, and they're not wrong when you study his character. He was an unstoppable warrior in the books, where only [[AchillesHeel his true name]] could stop his rampage. Here he's an AdaptationalWimp who compensates by being bombastically scary. But besides getting angry and strangling Creeper, he doesn't get [[OrcusOnHisThrone to do anything]] for the majority of the film. He has no real power of his own, and is carried by either his minions or the GreaterScopeVillain's DyingCurse. Fans argue he left a lasting impression to inspire the Lich King for ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'', but likewise point out that character being an indefinable EldritchAbomination was a ''true'' menace to all life; whereas the Horned King was underdeveloped because has no backstory, and it's never explained why he looks undead. Some think he's memorable, though reviewers have refuted that he's nowhere near as iconic as [[Franchise/MastersOfTheUniverse Skeletor]]. Even Hexxus' fiery skeletal form from ''[[WesternAnimation/FernGullyTheLastRainforest Fern Gully]]'', of all things, is more [[OneWingedAngel terrifying]] than him. Both sides can agree though, he had a disrespectfully [[AntiClimax anticlimactic send off]].



* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man dissolving graphically. In fact, if it remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating), considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' received a PG rating in 2000 despite including an equally violent scene where a Martian vortex rips a man to shreds.



* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man dissolving graphically. In fact, if it remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating), considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' received a PG rating in 2000 despite including an equally violent scene where a Martian vortex rips a man to shreds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Many viewers could not ''stand'' Taran for his whiny, complaining, and entitled ways. Especially since all he amounts to in this DarkFantasy adaptation is a FailureHero who's completely out of their depth. Even though he [[CharacterDevelopment gets better by the end]] and accepts he's no warrior, his overall performance still leaves a lasting negative impression.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BaseBreakingCharacter: The Horned King. Some argue he's one of the best villains ever, because of how monstrous and unhumorous he is in a DarkerAndEdgier film. Others argue it's ''because'' of those reasons, that make him one of the worst Disney villains ever, and they're not wrong when you study his character. He was an unstoppable warrior in the books, where only [[AchillesHeel his true name]] could stop his rampage. Here he's an AdaptationalWimp who compensates by being bombastically scary. But besides getting angry and strangling Creeper, he doesn't get [[OrcusOnHisThrone to do anything]] for the majority of the film. He has no real power of his own, and is carried by either his minions or the GreaterScopeVillain's DyingCurse. Fans argue he left a lasting impression to inspire the Lich King for ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'', but likewise point out that character being an indefinable EldritchAbombation was a ''true'' menace to all life; whereas the Horned King was underdeveloped because has no backstory, and it's never explained why he looks undead. Some think he's memorable, though reviewers have refuted that he's nowhere near as iconic as [[Franchise/MastersOfTheUniverse Skeletor]]. Even Hexxus' fiery skeletal form from ''[[FernGullyTheLastRainforest Fern Gully]]'', of all things, is more [[OneWingedAngel terrifying]] than him. Both sides can agree though, he had a disrespectfully [[AntiClimax anticlimactic send off]].

to:

* BaseBreakingCharacter: The Horned King. Some argue he's one of the best villains ever, because of how monstrous and unhumorous he is in a DarkerAndEdgier film. Others argue it's ''because'' of those reasons, that make him one of the worst Disney villains ever, and they're not wrong when you study his character. He was an unstoppable warrior in the books, where only [[AchillesHeel his true name]] could stop his rampage. Here he's an AdaptationalWimp who compensates by being bombastically scary. But besides getting angry and strangling Creeper, he doesn't get [[OrcusOnHisThrone to do anything]] for the majority of the film. He has no real power of his own, and is carried by either his minions or the GreaterScopeVillain's DyingCurse. Fans argue he left a lasting impression to inspire the Lich King for ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'', but likewise point out that character being an indefinable EldritchAbombation EldritchAbomination was a ''true'' menace to all life; whereas the Horned King was underdeveloped because has no backstory, and it's never explained why he looks undead. Some think he's memorable, though reviewers have refuted that he's nowhere near as iconic as [[Franchise/MastersOfTheUniverse Skeletor]]. Even Hexxus' fiery skeletal form from ''[[FernGullyTheLastRainforest ''[[WesternAnimation/FernGullyTheLastRainforest Fern Gully]]'', of all things, is more [[OneWingedAngel terrifying]] than him. Both sides can agree though, he had a disrespectfully [[AntiClimax anticlimactic send off]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BaseBreakingCharacter: The Horned King. Some argue he's one of the best villains ever, because of how monstrous and unhumorous he is in a DarkerAndEdgier film. Others argue it's ''because'' of those reasons, that make him one of the worst Disney villains ever, and they're not wrong when you study his character. He was an unstoppable warrior in the books, where only [[AchillesHeel his true name]] could stop his rampage. Here he's an AdaptationalWimp who compensates by being bombastically scary. But besides getting angry and strangling Creeper, he doesn't get [[OrcusOnHisThrone to do anything]] for the majority of the film. He has no real power of his own, and is carried by either his minions or the GreaterScopeVillain's DyingCurse. Fans argue he left a lasting impression to inspire the Lich King for ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'', but likewise point out that character being an indefinable EldritchAbombation was a ''true'' menace to all life; whereas the Horned King was underdeveloped because has no backstory, and it's never explained why he looks undead. Some think he's memorable, though reviewers have refuted that he's nowhere near as iconic as [[Franchise/MastersOfTheUniverse Skeletor]]. Even Hexxus' fiery skeletal form from ''[[FernGullyTheLastRainforest Fern Gully]]'', of all things, is more [[OneWingedAngel terrifying]] than him. Both sides can agree though, he had a disrespectfully [[AntiClimax anticlimactic send off]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Got rid of inaccurate information.


** The film being rated PG was a big deal in its time, and seen as a huge sign of its attempts to be DarkerAndEdgier. Since TheNewTens, [[AvoidTheDreadedGRating it has been the standard rating for big-budget animated films]]. Of course, the film as it stands is still a fair bit nastier than a lot of its successors (though perhaps not PG-13 unless you account for deleted footage). When the film was in production, the next highest rating above PG was R, and PG films were seen as "anything that you wouldn't necessarily ''ban'' a kid from being able to watch".

to:

** The film being rated PG was a big deal in its time, and seen as a huge sign of its attempts to be DarkerAndEdgier. Since TheNewTens, [[AvoidTheDreadedGRating it has been the standard rating for big-budget animated films]]. Of course, the film as it stands is still a fair bit nastier than a lot of its successors (though perhaps not PG-13 unless you account for deleted footage). When the film was in production, the next highest rating above PG was R, and PG films were seen as "anything that you wouldn't necessarily ''ban'' a kid from being able to watch".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


*** ''Mickey Mouse'' on the UsefulNotes/GameBoy in 1989 has him as the final boss.

to:

*** ''Mickey Mouse'' on the UsefulNotes/GameBoy Platform/GameBoy in 1989 has him as the final boss.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. The film incorporated kid-appeal elements like the changes made to Gurgi and the addition of the Fair Folk. However, many deemed certain aspects of the film, like the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, too intense for young children, resulting in it being Disney's first animated film to receive a PG rating. This trope likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.

to:

* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; its uncertainty over who it was trying to appeal to; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. The film incorporated kid-appeal elements like the changes made to Gurgi and the addition of the Fair Folk. However, many deemed certain aspects of the film, like the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, too intense for young children, resulting in it being Disney's first animated film to receive a PG rating. This trope likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. The film has kid-appeal elements like the changes made to Gurgi and the addition of the Fair Folk, even though a lot of the film's content, such as the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, were still regarded as too intense for young children (it was notably ''Disney'''s first animated film to be rated PG), which likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.

to:

* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. The film has incorporated kid-appeal elements like the changes made to Gurgi and the addition of the Fair Folk, even though a lot Folk. However, many deemed certain aspects of the film's content, such as film, like the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, were still regarded as too intense for young children (it was notably ''Disney'''s children, resulting in it being Disney's first animated film to be rated PG), which receive a PG rating. This trope likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. The film has goofy [[KidAppealCharacter Kid-Appealing Characters]] like Gurgi, even though a lot of the film's content, such as the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, were still regarded as too intense for young children (it was notably ''Disney'''s first animated film to be rated PG), which likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.

to:

* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. The film has goofy [[KidAppealCharacter Kid-Appealing Characters]] kid-appeal elements like Gurgi, the changes made to Gurgi and the addition of the Fair Folk, even though a lot of the film's content, such as the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, were still regarded as too intense for young children (it was notably ''Disney'''s first animated film to be rated PG), which likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Corrected information.


* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]], or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. As a result, they had to edit a lot of the film's more graphic and scary content while adding goofier kid-appeal elements, which alienated fantasy fans and especially fans of ''The Chronicles of Prydain''. Even then a lot of the film's content, such as the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, were still regarded as too intense for young children (it was notably ''Disney'''s first animated film to be rated PG), which likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.

to:

* UncertainAudience: One of the main reasons the movie didn't do well was this trope; they couldn't seem to decide between making a more serious dark fantasy film that stuck closer to [[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain the source material]], material]] or a more whimsical and lighthearted fantasy film geared towards children. As a result, they had to edit a lot of the film's more graphic and scary content while adding goofier kid-appeal elements, which alienated fantasy fans and especially fans of ''The Chronicles of Prydain''. Even then The film has goofy [[KidAppealCharacter Kid-Appealing Characters]] like Gurgi, even though a lot of the film's content, such as the Horned King and the Cauldron Born, were still regarded as too intense for young children (it was notably ''Disney'''s first animated film to be rated PG), which likely contributed to the film's commercial failure. Nowadays, most people agree the movie would probably have been better if they'd gone full DarkerAndEdgier, as these tend to be the parts people enjoy most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating), considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' received a PG rating in 2000 despite including an equally violent scene where a Martian vortex rips a man to shreds.

to:

* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]].graphically. In fact, if it remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating), considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' received a PG rating in 2000 despite including an equally violent scene where a Martian vortex rips a man to shreds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' received a PG rating in 2000 despite including an equally violent scene where a Martian vortex rips a man to shreds.

to:

* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) rating), considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' received a PG rating in 2000 despite including an equally violent scene where a Martian vortex rips a man to shreds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it were unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given a PG rating in 2000 despite having an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by a Martian vortex.

to:

* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it were remained unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten received a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact considering that Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given received a PG rating in 2000 despite having including an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by where a Martian vortex.vortex rips a man to shreds.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)


* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it were unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact that Disney's own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given a PG rating in 2000 despite having an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by a Martian vortex.

to:

* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]]. In fact, if it were unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact that Disney's Disney's[[note]]The film was released under the [[Creator/{{Touchstone Pictures}} Touchstone Pictures]] label, but still.[[/note]] own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given a PG rating in 2000 despite having an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by a Martian vortex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]], so that it wouldn’t get a higher rating. In fact, if it were unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact that Disney's own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given a PG rating in 2000 despite having an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by a Martian vortex.

to:

* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]], so that it wouldn’t get a higher rating.graphically]]. In fact, if it were unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact that Disney's own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given a PG rating in 2000 despite having an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by a Martian vortex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* CommonKnowledge: Jeffery Katzenberg did not edit the film so that it wouldn’t receive an R rating. The misconception comes from the fact that Jeffery Katzenberg edited the movie due to it being “too dark” for the test screen audience due to the "cauldron born" sequence containing a violent scene of a man [[ImMelting dissolving graphically]], so that it wouldn’t get a higher rating. In fact, if it were unedited, it ''still'' would’ve gotten a PG rating by mid-1980s standards (even after the creation of the PG-13 rating) due to the fact that Disney's own ''Film/MissionToMars'' was given a PG rating in 2000 despite having an equally violent scene of a man getting ripped to shreds by a Martian vortex.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: Adverts [[MisaimedMarketing lured kids in with a light-hearted fantasy adventure of wonder and magic]]. The actual work is nothing like that, in which the film itself contains some NightmareFuel content (which was toned down due to ExecutiveMeddling). It still didn't stop it from getting a Universal -- a "suitable for everyone" rating in the UK, due to some mild ValuesDissonance on the subject of scary imagery.

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: Adverts [[MisaimedMarketing lured kids in with a light-hearted fantasy adventure of wonder and magic]]. The actual work is nothing like that, in which the film itself contains some NightmareFuel content (which (some of which was toned down due to ExecutiveMeddling). It still didn't stop it from getting a Universal -- a "suitable for everyone" rating in the UK, due to some mild ValuesDissonance on the subject of scary imagery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Corrected information.


* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: Or at least, [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids it was not originally intended to be]] before the ExecutiveMeddling. Adverts [[MisaimedMarketing lured kids in with a light-hearted fantasy adventure of wonder and magic]]. The actual work is nothing like that. Still didn't stop it from getting a Universal -- a "suitable for everyone" rating in the UK, due to some mild ValuesDissonance on the subject of violence.

to:

* WhatDoYouMeanItsForKids: Or at least, [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotForKids it was not originally intended to be]] before the ExecutiveMeddling. Adverts [[MisaimedMarketing lured kids in with a light-hearted fantasy adventure of wonder and magic]]. The actual work is nothing like that. Still that, in which the film itself contains some NightmareFuel content (which was toned down due to ExecutiveMeddling). It still didn't stop it from getting a Universal -- a "suitable for everyone" rating in the UK, due to some mild ValuesDissonance on the subject of violence.scary imagery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CatharsisFactor: Being a savage overlord willing to turn his own men into an army of the undead, [[spoiler:the Horned King getting destroyed up the cauldron is a savage and fitting fate for him]] in the end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Due to the movie's failure, it wasn't released onto home video until ''1998, 10 years later'', when ''{{WesternAnimation/Mulan}}'' was released, making it the first time anyone since then has remembered Princess Eilonwy. Go on. Guess which heroine ended up becoming an official Disney Princess and which one gets ignored again...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Gypsy who briefly appears to entertain the Horned King's henchmen during his introductory scene resembles a fat, ugly, old [[WesternAnimation/TheHunchbackofNotreDameDisney Esmeralda]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationDisplacement: There's a book. That's right, there is a book called ''[[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain The Black Cauldron]]''. And its author actually enjoyed the movie, albeit in a SoBadItsGood sort of way. While the books aren't totally obscure (especially for fans of HighFantasy and Welsh mythology) and did pretty well when they were first published in the 1960s, they're not as well known among the general populace as the animated film (and the movie might be known more from the infamy surrounding it).

to:

* AdaptationDisplacement: There's a book. That's right, there is a book called ''[[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain The Black Cauldron]]''. And its author actually enjoyed the movie, albeit in a SoBadItsGood sort of way. While the books aren't totally obscure (especially for fans of HighFantasy and Welsh mythology) and did pretty well when they were first published in the 1960s, The60s, they're not as well known among the general populace as the animated film (and the movie might be known more from the infamy surrounding it).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationDisplacement: There's a book. That's right, there is a book called ''[[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain The Black Cauldron]]''. And its author actually enjoyed the movie, albeit in a SoBadItsGood sort of way. While the books aren't totally obscure (especially for fans of high fantasy and Welsh mythology) and did pretty well when they were first published in the 1960s, they're not as well known among the general populace as the animated film (and the movie might be known more from the infamy surrounding it).

to:

* AdaptationDisplacement: There's a book. That's right, there is a book called ''[[Literature/TheChroniclesOfPrydain The Black Cauldron]]''. And its author actually enjoyed the movie, albeit in a SoBadItsGood sort of way. While the books aren't totally obscure (especially for fans of high fantasy HighFantasy and Welsh mythology) and did pretty well when they were first published in the 1960s, they're not as well known among the general populace as the animated film (and the movie might be known more from the infamy surrounding it).

Added: 348

Removed: 348

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CreatorsPet: Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, was in love with the character of Gurgi so much that he basically started putting [[{{Expy}} expies]] of him in other Disney films around the same time as this film premiered. This is despite the fact that his high-pitched voice and obnoxious behavior alienated a large percentage of the general audience.



* CreatorsPet: Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, was in love with the character of Gurgi so much that he basically started putting [[{{Expy}} expies]] of him in other Disney films around the same time as this film premiered. This is despite the fact that his high-pitched voice and obnoxious behavior alienated a large percentage of the general audience.

Added: 1199

Removed: 1195

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OnceOriginalNowCommon:
** For the Disney version, this movie actually predated ''WesternAnimation/TheGreatMouseDetective'' in the animated canon's [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects use of CGI]]. These days, it's very obvious to see the moment it's used, and it borders upon SpecialEffectFailure. But back in the 80s, that wasn't done before.
** Towards the book series it was based off of, it reads almost like a shopping list of cliches. Except one has to consider that the series was originally published in ''the sixties'' -- Taran predates ''[[Film/StarWarsANewHope Luke Skywalker]]'' in the "Farm-boy turned hero who befriends a princess".
** The film being rated PG was a big deal in its time, and seen as a huge sign of its attempts to be DarkerAndEdgier. Since TheNewTens, [[AvoidTheDreadedGRating it has been the standard rating for big-budget animated films]]. Of course, the film as it stands is still a fair bit nastier than a lot of its successors (though perhaps not PG-13 unless you account for deleted footage). When the film was in production, the next highest rating above PG was R, and PG films were seen as "anything that you wouldn't necessarily ''ban'' a kid from being able to watch".



* SeinfeldIsUnfunny:
** For the Disney version, this movie actually predated ''WesternAnimation/TheGreatMouseDetective'' in the animated canon's [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects use of CGI]]. These days, it's very obvious to see the moment it's used, and it borders upon SpecialEffectFailure. But back in the 80s, that wasn't done before.
** Towards the book series it was based off of, it reads almost like a shopping list of cliches. Except one has to consider that the series was originally published in ''the sixties'' - Taran predates ''[[Film/StarWarsANewHope Luke Skywalker]]'' in the "Farm-boy turned hero who befriends a princess".
** The film being rated PG was a big deal in its time, and seen as a huge sign of its attempts to be DarkerAndEdgier. Since TheNewTens, [[AvoidTheDreadedGRating it has been the standard rating for big-budget animated films]]. Of course, the film as it stands is still a fair bit nastier than a lot of its successors (though perhaps not PG-13 unless you account for deleted footage). When the film was in production, the next highest rating above PG was R, and PG films were seen as "anything that you wouldn't necessarily ''ban'' a kid from being able to watch."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SpiritualSuccessor: The film has often been called the closest Disney would ever be to making a ''Franchise/DungeonsAndDragons'' animated movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MisBlamed: Gurgi's mannerisms were not, in fact, Disney putting in an obvious PluckyComicRelief -- things like talking in the third-person, speaking in redundant phrases, referring to Taran as a lord, and "Munchies and crunchies" are in fact in the books, and Gurgi still does play somewhat of a comic relief character. Disney's main change was just to make him a small, cute dog-like creature instead of a human-sized man/beast hybrid.

to:

* MisBlamed: Gurgi's mannerisms were not, in fact, Disney putting in an obvious PluckyComicRelief -- things like talking in the third-person, speaking in redundant phrases, referring to Taran as a lord, and "Munchies and crunchies" are in fact in the books, and Gurgi still does play somewhat of a comic relief character. Disney's main change was just to make him a small, cute dog-like creature instead of a human-sized man/beast hybrid.Sasquatch-like creature.

Top