YMMV / Jack and the Beanstalk

  • Alternative Character Interpretation:
    • Was the stranger who sold Jack the beans trying to help him or was he intending to con Jack and didn't know they really were magic?
    • Jack as well. His actions aren't exactly what most today would consider "moral". However all of his acts are done out of desperation. He steals from someone who has a wealth of treasure he seems to have no need for because he's living in poverty in a time where it's much harder to make ends meet as it is, and chops down the beanstalk because the giant was on his way down to capture him. An anti-hero, to be sure, but certainly not the Villain Protagonist many see him as.
    • Of course, he keeps stealing even after he has a goose that will supply unlimited gold...
    • Also the giant. Is he right in wanting back the things Jack stole? However he's also a murderous cannibal intent on slaughtering and eating Jack the second he catches him. Some versions also imply his own wife is afraid of him!
  • Designated Hero: Jack, an idiot who sells his family's biggest good for a seemingly worthless item, gets lucky when it turns out to be more valuable, then uses it to steal some other guy's stuff even though his wife, who also owns that stuff, was kind to him. Various adaptations have taken their own way in dealing with this. The Disney adaptation had the harp Jack (or rather Mickey) steals from the giant belong to his town in the first place, so he's taking back his own property. Other retellings take a similar route by stating that the money, goose and harp originally belonged to Jack's father, whom the giant killed. Into the Woods deconstructs the story by having Jack face the consequences of his actions, in the form of the giant's wife coming after him for revenge.
  • Designated Villain: The giant, a guy defending his home against a persistent thief, and is killed by him. (Of course, he was also going to eat Jack, but wanting his stuff back is perfectly valid.)
  • Draco in Leather Pants: The giant gets a lot of this. Yes, he wanted back the things Jack stole, that's fair enough. However, many ignore/forget that he's also a murderous cannibal intent on slaughtering and eating Jack the second he catches him. It's even implied his own wife is afraid of him!
  • Family-Unfriendly Aesop: The moral of the story seems to be that you should totally give away something that has a lot of worth for something that seems worthless, because it'll always pay off by giving you immense wealth.
    • Or that stealing is the way forward.
    • There's an animated Fractured Fairy Tale version that openly embraces this trope, portraying Jack's mother as constantly thwarting her son's efforts to enrich them by stealing magical money-making devices from a cruel and magical millionaire, ultimately leaving them both as poor as ever as the narrator openly proclaims honesty and principles are not inherently rewarding.
  • Memetic Mutation: "Fee-Fi-Fo-Fum, I smell the blood of an Englishman...".