Gertrude murdered Ophelia.She seems to know an awful lot about Ophelia's death - before, during and after it happened. She also doesn't seem that upset. Hmm.
Hamlet is Claudius's illegitimate son, and Hamlet is one of the few people at court who doesn't know it.
- At least once, Claudius calls Hamlet "our son" when speaking to Gertrude. Maybe a figure of speech ... maybe not.
- This would explain why the crown went to Claudius instead of Hamlet, and no one appears to have a problem with it. It also explains why, on the other hand, everyone is fine with Hamlet's eventually inheriting the crown from Claudius (mentioned several times).
- It might also be because Denmark has an electorate system of kingship, as mentioned in the play.
- It adds layers of ambiguity, guilt, and secrets to Hamlet's Act IV confrontation with Gertrude: think of all the things she could say that might clarify matters, yet leave them even worse.
- Old Hamlet's ghost knows this, but relishes the chance of using his brother's bastard as his instrument of vengeance.
- Suddenly, Fridge Horror abounds everywhere one looks.
Hamlet is a robot.Built by Hamlet Sr., he struggles to understand humans.
Ophelia is pregnant.Not so much WMG as very strongly hinted...
Horatio is making this whole thing up.He actually killed everyone. Possibly driven mad by all the angst.
Horatio is a spy for Fortinbras.He has been secretly manipulating things at court to make Fortinbras's takeover smoother. He pretended he was going to drink the poison because he truly liked Hamlet and wanted Hamlet to still think of him as a friend before Hamlet died. This leaves Horatio alive at the end to report to Fortinbras everything that has happened.
Hamlet and Horatio are lovers."Give me that man / That is not passion's slave, and i will wear him / In my heart's core, aye, in my heart of hearts / As I do thee. " - Act 3 Scene 2, 71-74 This wayward passion if of course not appropriate for a prince. But the anxiety of being closeted with his love serves as a major source of his anger and melancholy.
- ...so Asta Nielsen's Hamlet, but without the gender-presentation/transgender themes. Extremely buyable.
Ophelia was visited by the ghost of King Hamlet after Polonius died.On that note, said ghost is an Eldritch Abomination who drives whoever it talks to to insanity. That's why it refused to speak to the guards. Lastly, Ophelia realized that the ghost planned to throw Denmark into ruin, so she committed suicide so she wouldn't be a part of it.
The ghost is a hallucination, not the actual spirit of King Hamlet.It doesn't speak to anyone except Hamlet, and when it does, it doesn't really give him new information. In fact, it tells him exactly what he wants to hear — his reaction is even "I knew it!" Also, not only is it the only character other than Hamlet to label Gertrude and Claudius' marriage as "incest", it actually seems more passionate and vehement about that topic than the whole, you know, murder thing. If it was really the ghost of Hamlet Sr., wouldn't he be more concerned with his brother killing him than his brother marrying his wife (as was standard practice back then)? Hamlet's the one with the "incest" hangup, so the only way this makes sense is if the ghost is a reflection of his own neuroses! And of course, Gertrude can't see the ghost, which is highly suspect given that the ghost is telling Hamlet to take mercy on her in that scene — why wouldn't it show itself to her? As for the guards, they never appear again after act 1 scene 2. Who's to say they aren't hallucinations either, made up by Hamlet to rationalize the ghost's appearance?
- This explanation makes a lot of sense thematically, but leaves several plot holes. Even going so far as to assume that the guards are hallucinations, what about Horatio? In fact, what about the entire first scene, in which Hamlet does not appear at all? Why doesn't the play simply start with I.ii?
Polonius aided Claudius in Old Hamlet's murderSince Polonius is a much more sinister and shifty character than the senile old man many misinterpret him as, it stands to reason that he may have conspired with Claudius to put him on the throne being the one to make sure that Old Hamlet was alone in the orchard. This makes Polonius' death at Hamlet's hands all the more enjoyable and it is perfectly obvious since any idiot who believes that Hamlet is a Designated Hero can't be anything but wrong.
- John Updike held to this idea and developed it in his novel Gertrude and Claudius.
Hamlet's insanity is real and is the result of a sublimated Oedipal complex.Oops, it looks like this theory's not so wild after all.
Horatio killed everybody.We see the events of Hamlet from Horatio's perspective. He is in every important scene and has off-stage events reported to him. He promises to tell Fortinbras the story of how Claudius, Gertrude, Hamlet, Laertes, Ophelia, Polonius, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern wound up dead. So he makes up an odd story involving ghosts, dueling with poisoned swords, mistaken identity and insanity to cover up that he's an Ax-Crazy maniac. For all we know, Horatio even murdered Yorick when he was a boy.
- I can see where this comes from, but Shakespeare isn't one for ambiguous endings; if something that dramatic was true in-play, he would have told us that somehow. Or maybe it's in a lost epilogue somewhere...
Horatio murdered everyone because he was Fortinbras's Brainwashed and Crazy puppet.Notice how he came in right when King Claudius was trying to appeal peace with Norway.
Hamlet knew Yorick in a biblical sense.Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio!
- He hath borne me on his back a thousand times.
- Which is a bit squicky, considering the age difference.
- It's doubtful that Hamlet would be so eager to tell Horatio he was having sex with Yorick.
- Which opens up the debate on whether Hamlet and Horatio are having a torrid affair...
- Horatio was a pagan, so he would have been cool. (Interesting, in light of Ophelia.)
- It would've been old news by then, anyway.
- Which opens up the debate on whether Hamlet and Horatio are having a torrid affair...
- On a more serious note, the joke might be that "knew" also meant "recognized." Much of the scene revolves around the idea that all skulls are equal and indistinguishable in death.
Hamlet knew everyone in the cemetery in a biblical sense.Except Ophelia.
Ophelia is PregnantSeen here, but also just type in 'Ophelia Pregnant' in a search engine and multiple results (20 300 from Ask.com) will show up.
Claudius is Hamlet's biological fatherDoesn't it seem odd that Gertrude willingly leaped right into bed with her husband's brother Claudius once Hamlet Senior kicked the bucket? Indeed, the Gravedigger scene informs us that Hamlet was born the same day that Hamlet, Sr. killed Fortinbras, Sr. Old Hamlet was out on military campaigns all the time. It's hardly a stretch to think that Gertrude fooled around with Claudius behind her husband's back. Claudius himself knows that Hamlet is his son, which is why he initially tries to be friends with him and insists that he remain at Elsinore rather than return to France for school. Indeed, Kenneth Branagh's adaptation all but makes this assertion. Branagh bears a much greater resemblance to Derek Jacobi than BRIAN BLESSED, and the scene where Claudius orders Hamlet's murder makes Claudius seem genuinely reluctant to do so.
- Extra context for those scenes where he basically calls his mother a whore.
Claudius is Laertes's biological fatherSuggested in the Mel Gibson Hamlet.
Hamlet is HamnetHamlet is close enough to his father to hate his mother when he dies. Shakespeare's supposed to have been recovering from the loss of his similarly named son when he wrote his adaption of the Amleth legend and probably hated his wife, what with his whole moving-to-London thing. What if at least part of Hamlet's character is what Shakespeare wished had happened if he'd died first (you know, aside from the poisoned daggers, &c.)?
- There's no record of Shakespeare going home for his son's funeral, and we know for a fact that his daughters were illiterate. Not exactly the picture of a loving father who'd write a play in his grief to honor his dead son.
Hamlet knows he's in a play.At least by Act 5 he does. Hamlet is constantly making metatheatrical references— to the practices common in Elizabethan theatre in general and to the Globe specifically. When he gets picked up by the pirates, he realizes what an obvious plot device it is (and it is— Shakespeare uses it in Pericles as well)— and he's Genre Savvy enough already for that to clue him in that he's a character in a play. This explains why he's so calm about facing the duel in Act 5— he knows how it's going to end already.
Hamlet is a flashback.Horatio is the narrator. He's in the first and last scenes, and in between he's in a lot of scenes but does almost nothing but observe. Hamlet tells him everything, and he's unobtrusive enough to have observed other scenes without being noticed, so that accounts for the scenes that he's not in. In his last speech to Fortinbras, he says: "Give order that these bodies high on a stage be placed to the view, and let me speak to the yet unknowing world how these things came about." That's another metatheatrical reference— the bodies are on a stage. Horatio has just finished narrating the entire tale to Fortinbras and this speech is where the flashback comes full circle.
- Addendum to this theory: That speech is a prologue, and as soon as they get offstage the entire play starts again. This is why Hamlet isn't bothered by death after realizing that he's in a play— see above— because he knows everything will reset next time the play starts.
- Which, if this were actually staged, would give Horatio the first and last lines of the play. It would open with him surrounded by bodies saying, "Why does the drum come hither?" and end with his previous line of, "Goodnight Sweet Prince..."
Hamlet didn't know Yorick at all.In his angst and near-lunacy, Hamlet gives an eloquent speech about the happiness of his youth...personified as a man he never even met. This represents the fact that Hamlet's youth probably wasn't as good as he thinks it was (after all, his mother seems to have loved his uncle all along, not to mention all that royal stress). With his father gone, Hamlet mentally rewrites his past: he had the best father ever born, the most loving mother, and, of course, the funniest and most loyal court jester.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were innocent.They didn't know the contents of the letter they were delivering. They were roped into Claudius' schemes because they genuinely wanted to help their poor mad friend.
- Heh heh, "roped" ...
- While they didn't know the contents of the letter, they were hired by Claudius to spy on Hamlet, a detail they hide so unskillfully that Hamlet picks up on it himself. So "innocent" is not the word I would use to describe them.
The Hamlet in the play is an impostor.As Claudius points out, 'neither the inward nor the outward man resembles' the Hamlet he remembers. Hamlet, taking caution from reports of his father's ghostly appearances and the rather suspicious succession of Claudius, does not come himself but instead sends a man impersonating him. The false Hamlet mostly tries to keep everyone off balance by acting unpredictably in order to preserve his secret while investigating the death of Hamlet's father. At the same time, he struggles with a strong attraction to Gertrude (hey, she's not his mother), and resorts to manipulating others to their deaths in order to stay alive himself. Finally, he is trapped into a duel with Laertes which he cannot evade, and it all goes terribly wrong.
- Then... where's the real Hamlet? Is Fortinbras actually "real" Hamlet, invading his own country by pretending to be his enemy? Or... is Hamlet Hiding In Plain Sight as Horatio, wearing a big mustache and glasses?