The hadrosaurs commonly shown in media are usually North-American. Other than the four/five kinds described in
Stock Dinosaurs, other "duck-billed dinosaurs" that have been quite common are:
Hadrosaurus (the official but fragmentary prototype of the family),
Kritosaurus (whose portrayals actually are based upon another relative,
Gryposaurus),
Saurolophus (often confused but not-related with
Parasaurolophus), and
Lambeosaurus (this one may get confused with
Corythosaurus). All them have even made occasional apparitions in films or TV program. Among Asian kinds the gigantic
Shantungosaurus and the "unicorn"
Tsintaosaurus are perhaps those most portrayed (together with the asian species of
Saurolophus).
All began with a duckbill: Hadrosaurus
and
Claosaurus
Surprise: “hadrosaur” not only means one precise group of related dinosaurs, it also indicates a single genus of duckbill:
Hadrosaurus. But its importance is almost-entirely historical. The
very first dinosaur ever identified as such in America (and outside Europe) from more remains than simple isolated teeth (year 1858), like most early discoveries
Hadrosaurus has a generic-meaning name, “heavy lizard”; and, oddly for an US dinosaurs, was found in New Jersey – since dino-discovers in
Eagle Land began in the East Coast while the upcoming “Bone-Wars” were “fought” in the West, one could say about a veritable Dino-Rush.
Hadrosaurus was already recognized as an
Iguanodon relative, but the latter was still depicted as totally-quadrupedal at the time.
Hadrosaurus remains, though very incomplete, cleary showed an at least partly
bipedal creature. Joseph Leidy (its namer) was the first paleontologist to have described a dinosaur in the classic upright posture: a revolutionary idea at the time, which became more popular later, expecially after the countless portraits of another guy,
guess who.
Hadrosaurus has also the distinction to have been the first dinosaur ever mounted in a museum. However, the original bipedal posture
has changed from upright to horizontal since the 1970s. Sadly,
Hadrosaurus skull was pratically unknown, so Leidy didn’t understand to be in front of “the first duckbill discovered”. Despite this, some books have portrayed
Hadrosaurus with a bump-nosed head for some reason. Actually,
Hadrosaurus is so incomplete that it could be a synonym of another kind of hadrosaur, though a recent study seems not to agree.
It was Edward Cope and Othniel Marsh who first described hadrosaurs as “duck”-headed animals. Cope described the popular “Trachodon”, Marsh a much more obscure animal,
Claosaurus, a fragmentary animal which is worth of note both because was one third long than most other hadrosaurs, and because is perhaps the most primitive North American duckbill. After its description,
Claosaurus was involved in the incredible "Trachodon"/
Anatosaurus/
Edmontosaurus/"Anatotitan" taxonomic tangle.
A decayed nobleman: Kritosaurus
,
Gryposaurus
, and
Secernosaurus
However, most hadrosaurs have been described in Alberta at the beginning of the XX century, in the second memorable “Dino-Rush” led in North-America. Among them, one of the most historically relevant has been
Kritosaurus.
In old books, it used to be shown as one of the prototypical hadrosaurs, along with “Anatosaurus”,
Parasaurolophus,
Corythosaurus, and
Saurolophus, and their skulls were often shown together making a sorta
Five Hadro Band. This “band” has also appeared once in cinema: in 1940, the “Rite of Spring” of
Fantasia portrayed all but one member, but the missing one was
Saurolophus, not
Kritosaurus. More precisely, the kritosaur is the one with the bulged-nose: this sort of Roman-nose has often been cited as the origin of its name, “noble lizard” (though the real meaning of “krito” is uncertain).
Then,
Science Marches On hit hard our
Kritosaurus. Recent studies made since the 1990s showed that its first skull with the classic bulge actually pertained to another duckbill, the much more obscure
Gryposaurus (incidentally its name, “Griffin lizard”, is also a reference to this nasal relief). To worsen things,
Kritosaurus has revealed to be a wastebasket-taxon, and most of its former remains are now of uncertain attribution. Today, we even don’t know if it had really the classic bump on its nose, and “Kritosaurus” has now become a poorly-known genus just like
Hadrosaurus.
To compensate,
Gryposaurus (found in 1910 but ignored for decades) has taken the heritage of this “decayed nobleman” and has become the new “bulge-nosed hadrosaur”, along with other two new discovered hadrosaurs known only from their skull: the Native American-sounding
Anasazisaurus and
Naashoibitosaurus. Also note that some “Kritosaurus” remains have been described in South America, but they almost certainly belong to the valid South American hadrosaur
Secernosaurus ("separated lizard"), a small primitive duckbill which is likely a migrant of North American origins.
USA and China make peace: Saurolophus
,
Prosaurolophus
, and
Brachylophosaurus
In general, Late Cretaceous dinosaurs are very similar in Western North-America and Eastern Asia. This because these landmasses were uned at the time by a stripe of dryland where today is the Bering Strait. This means that dinosaurs at the time could wander from one continent to another. Nonetheless, Asian and North American dinosaurs are usually classified as distinct genera (see
Tyrannosaurus rex and
Tarbosaurus bataar for example).
But there is also an exception:
Saurolophus is perhaps the
only dinosaur whose North American and Asian remains are always classified in the same genus, though to distinct species. First discovered in North America during the aforementioned “Canadian dino-rush”,
Saurolophus has left few fossils in Alberta, but much more have been then discovered near China during the Russian dinosaur-hunt in Mongolia (at the time Mongolia was under URSS influence) which followed the first American one led by Andrews in the 1920s.
Saurolophus still remains today the most abundant duckbill from Asia.
However, its North American species has also been important initially. Think about
Parasaurolophus: discovered soon after
Saurolophus, its name just means “near
Saurolophus”. Indeed, both dinosaurs were superficially similar, with a bony “horn” pointing backward from the rear-end of their skull. But that of
Saurolophus was
far shorter, more pointed, and made by solid bone, not hollow like that of “Para”. There is also a third similarly-named hadrosaur,
Prosaurolophus, which means “before
Saurolophus”. Still another is
Brachylophosaurus, (“short crested lizard”). Indeed, “loph-” is a common particle among hadrosaurian names (and theropodian as well: think about “Dilophosaurus”…); this is indeed the Greek for crest. These two last examples are small, primitive North American hadrosaurs found some years after
Saurolophus but with incospicuous crests similarly to
Maiasaura. In spite of having left abundant remains, their modest appearance make them a rare sight in media.
note Even though Brachylophosaurus has recently given us some spectacular fossils which might make it more widely-known: among these, a true “mummy”, just like Edmontosaurus.
Talking about the more familiar
Saurolophus and
Parasaurolophus, the two “horned” duckbills tend often to be confused each other by non-specialists - and their similar names don’t exactly help to resolve the mixup, too. The main example is seen in the
Land Before Time: Ducky, the hadrosaurian member of the
Five-Man Band of dinosaurs, has a clearly
Saurolophus-like crest, and yet has been labeled
Parasaurolophus. Astonishingly
Saurolophus (and
Prosaurolophus and
Brachylophosaurus as well) were closer to
crestless hadrosaurs like
Edmontosaurus than to
Parasaurolophus! Just like
Edmontosaurus,
Saurolophus has often been depicted in paleo-art with a speculative, inflatable, frog-like air-sac on their snout, but this is not demostrated.
Frisbee players...: Hypacrosaurus
,
Amurosaurus
, and
Olorotitan
If you see a “frisbee”-crested hadrosaur in books or documentaries, be not sure it’s a
Corythosaurus. The latter had indeed a twin called
Hypacrosaurus, with a similar crest though fairly-smaller. Sadly, since some (possibly female)
Corythosaurus also have a rather low crest, this doesn’t help us so much to separate the two; the most sure trait to do it is to watch the taller neural spines of
Hypacrosaurus in a mount. Not surprisingly,
Hypacrosaurus has been confused with
Corythosaurus or even
Lambeosaurus (see further) in the past, and to complicate matters, some juvenile remains from these three animals were even labeled as a genus on its own, "Procheneosaurus"!
However, in the nineties, a nidification site in North America full of
Hypacrosaurus nests and hatchlings has been discovered, analogue, to the classic
Maiasaura; this find has made
Hypacrosaurus a more well-known duckbill. Meanwhile, two brand new flat-crested hadrosaurs were found near the Amur river which divides Russia from China:
Amurosaurus and the spectacular hatchet-crested
Olorotitan ("titanic swan": a clear reference to
Anatotitan the "titanic duck").
…and trumpet players: Charonosaurus
On the other hand, if you see a “trumpet”-crested hadrosaur in books or documentaries, be sure it’s a
Parasaurolophus… unless you’re watching a work made after year 2000. Indeed, in that year a very
Parasaurolophus-like hadrosaur was discovered in the same Amur site cited above:
Charonosaurus. This one was also bigger than its North-American cousin… only, its skull is incomplete, with
only the base of the crest preserved; the shape of the remaining crest is only a guess. Nonetheless, the discover of the “Amur hadrosaurs” has enhanced our knowledge of duckbills in general. Before that, the Asian were considered generally more primitive than the North-American ones. As we know their Asian counterparts,
this is not true anymore.
The biggest. Or maybe not: Lambeosaurus
,
Shantungosaurus
, and
Magnapaulia
Even though is often passed off, hadrosaurs were the biggest non-sauropodian dinosaurs. The most massive species were taller, longer and heavier than even the larger ceratopsians, stegosaurs, or ankylosaurs. And though not necessarily taller/longer, thanks to their massive bodies, they were heavier than giant theropods like
Tyrannosaurus or even
Spinosaurus itself! But which kind was the record-holder?
Traditionally, two hadrosaurs have contended the record: North-American
Lambeosaurus and Chinese
Shantungosaurus.
Lambeosaurus is probably the most striking-looking among North-American hadrosaurs, but is usually unseen in fiction unlike, to say,
Parasaurolophus or
Corythosaurus. And yet, it has one of the richest fossil record among all hadrosaurs (unlike the very rare
Parasaurolophus), with two distinct species described plus a putative third one (reclassified in 2012 in a brand new genus,
Magnapaulia).
Lambeosaurus has also given its name to its own hadrosaurian subgroup, Lambeosaurines aka hollow-crested duckbills:
Parasaurolophus and
Corythosaurus are, thus, lambeosaurines.
Overall,
Lambeosaurus was similar to
Corythosaurus with a flat, vertical crest with the same hollow spaces. However, the most known species’s crest was taller, narrower, more rectangular, and with a secondary point raising backwards: a sort of “glove” with the “thumb” placed at 90° in respect to the main body (it is possible though, that only males did have that secondary point). The other confirmed species had a more rounded crest without the secondary point, but was spectacularly big and pointed slighty forwards.
Magnapaulia, even though poorly-known, has the distinction to be the biggest North American hadrosaur known so far (15m/50ft of length), while the two confirmed species were “only” 10 m long, the same size as most hadrosaurs. Significantly, the normal-sized
Lambeosauruses have classically been
oversized in books, to match Magnapaulia.
Discovered in the 1970s,
Shantungosaurus was a crestless hadrosaur quite similar to
Edmontosaurus, but with the same size of
Magnapaulia (15 m/50 ft long); yet,
Shantungosaurus has traditionally not received so much attention, even in books. Recently discovered incomplete
Shantungosaurus remains seem to show an even larger animal (16 m); these specimens were initially thought to be their own genera, "Zhuchengosaurus" and "Huaxiaosaurus".
All began with a duckbill 2: Mandschurosaurus
,
Tsintaosaurus
,
Bactrosaurus
, and
Probactrosaurus
Everywhere seems to have started with a large ornithopod. We have
Hadrosaurus in the USA,
Iguanodon in Europe; and what about China? Here, the role was assumed by a little-known hadrosaur,
Mandschurosaurus - “Mandschuria” is the German graphy for Manchuria, the northern Chinese region where the find was made in 1930. This is not a mere case however: remember ornithopods were the “antelopes” of their time... and we know well antelopes are the most numerous large mammals in Africa.
Then, several others followed: the most debated has been
Tsintaosaurus. Nicknamed the “unicorn dinosaur” because of its high, pointed crest on its head,
Tsintaosaurus was found in the 1940s and thus is one of the “classic” Chinese dinosaurs. It also has had one of the most tormented
Science Marches On stories among all dinosaurs. Initially was described from fragmentary remains that seemed to show that horn-thing upon its head; then, scientists took it away in the 1990s, thinking it actually was a misplaced piece from the rest of its skull; but a recently discovered complete skull shows
Tsintaosaurus really
does deserves the “unicorn” title.
Some other Asian hadrosaurs were much more generically-looking: for example,
Bactrosaurus, one of the smallest hadrosaurs known – only 6 m long. Discovered in China and in Russia,
Bactrosaurus is also one of the earliest hadrosaurs, without any crest on its head, and still rather
Iguanodon-like in look – remember hadrosaurs are just very specialized iguanodontians phylogenetically speaking. The legacy with
Iguanodon is confirmed by
Probactrosaurus, an Early Cretaceous ornithopod which was still not a proper hadrosaur, but was going to become such. Also Asian, it was so similar-looking to
Bactrosaurus to give a concrete clue about hadrosaurs’ ancestry (its name just means “before
Bactrosaurus).
Ancient Mediterraneans: Telmatosaurus
and
Tethyshadros
As seen above most hadrosaurs have been discovered in North America and Asia. While most Asian dinosaurs are known from China and/or Mongolia, several duckbills were found in unusual countries such as the former URSS (ex.
Bactrosaurus,
Aralosaurus,
Jaxartosaurus) and even in Japan (the meaningfully-named
Nipponosaurus)
note Actually Nipponosaurus was dug out in the Russian island of Sakhalin, but at the time of its finding (1934) this island was Japanese. Dinosaurs from actual Japan have been discovered only since the 1980s.. But there are also few hadrosaurs that have been found in Europe: the traditionally most-known is
Telmatosaurus.
A smallish animal known from incomplete fossils,
Telmatosaurus is one of the several dinosaurs discovered in Late-Cretaceous Central Europe from France to Romania, along with
Struthiosaurus,
Magyarosaurus,
Rhabdodon, and the bizarre
four sickle-clawed dromaeosaurid
Balaur (found only in year 2012). At the time most Europe was covered by the ancient inner-ocean Tethys (considered the ancestor of the Mediterranean Sea), and small islands were the only pieces of dryland
Telmatosaurus could have lived on. How it was able to reach these islands from Asia is still a mystery. In year 2009 its relative
Tethyshadros ("hadrosaur from Tethys") was found in Northern Italy; this is now the most complete European duckbill.