I cannot — yet I must! How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do 'must' and 'cannot' meet?
Logic, logic, logic. Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not its end.
: It was really more foolish than that. I used to ask myself ó why doesn't she love me? Mary
: You asked yourself - that? Bob
: All the time. Mary
: (Throws bedclothes on sofa, exploding.)
That's why I hate intellectuals! They're all so dumb!
Like all cyborgs I am unhampered by emotions unless required otherwise by lazy scriptwriters.
Chaos and optionality, which to these days governed the historical and political ideas, have been replaced by a stunningly uniform and harmonious scientific theory.
Logic is like the sword — those who appeal to it, shall perish by it.
Logic is a poor guide compared with custom.
Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities.
I've never been a fan of books. I don't trust them. They're all fact and no heart.
Consider Mr. Spock of Star Trek
, a naive archetype of rationality. Spock's emotional state is always set to 'calm', even when wildly inappropriate
. He often gives many significant digits for probabilities that are grossly uncalibrated. (E.g: "Captain, if you steer the Enterprise directly into that black hole, our probability of surviving is only 2.234%" Yet nine times out of ten
is not destroyed. What kind of tragic fool
gives four significant digits for a figure that is off by two orders of magnitude?) Yet this popular image is how many people conceive of the duty to be "rational"ósmall wonder that they do not embrace it wholeheartedly.
While the idea of having Tuvok betray Janeway makes for good drama, the plot doesnít do enough to explain it
. It is worth noting that Tuvokís betrayal is a rather cynical portrayal of Vulcans, suggesting that Voyager
buys into the same logic as Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
. Far from a rational ideal, Prime Factors seems to present logic as a philosophy easily corrupted Ė falling into the trap of suggesting that human 'feeling' is objectively the right way to view the universe. 'You can use logic to justify almost anything,
' Janeway explains. 'Thatís itís power, and itís flaw.
' She stops short of suggesting that one must follow their gut.
Wow. I've never seen a Vulcan cave that fast. This might be the quickest mental takedown of a Vulcan by a lowly, emotional human in the history of the franchise. Usually, it takes a little while before the human character's insane, emotionally-based plan pays off, much to the Vulcan's chagrin
...Seriously, this happens so much that, logically, the Vulcans should consider giving up on the whole logic-only thing. I mean, going by what we see on screen, it never, ever works.
It was whilst Tuvok was dismissing Parisí suggestions of recreating Vulcan that I realised he was now by far the most boring character on this show. He rejects any attempt at humour, fails to acknowledge the beauty and wonder of space travel and has become little more than a humourless, one note joke that all of the characters have a kick at eventually. I pity poor Tim Russ who on the few occasions gets to do something different proves to be an excellent actor
but considering that is once every three seasons you would never be able to tell if you took a glance at the series as a whole.
Oh dear, I really don't think I'm going to like this T'Pol. I've found that Vulcans can run the gamut from mellow (Saavik, Voyager
's sadly underused Vorik) to gruff (Tuvok, Sarek) to kind of sassy (Spock, Valeris), all under the guise of logic and restrained emotion. They're my favourite Trek
species, actually. What can I say? A large part of me has to relate to the guy standing at the back of the room with his armed folded, rolling his eyes at everyone.
I don't think I've ever met one I didn't like. Until now.