Just then, a feminist jumps out of a manhole - oh, and she didn't like that
Seems like equality for women has ended up meaning inequality for men.
It's the media, man, the goddamn brainwashing mainstream feminist fascist media.
All men are potential rapists. All men. Without exception.
— Jane, in Shirley Valentine
They really are a vicious group. They don’t like men, and they want anything to discredit and destroy men....It’s really dangerous for a guy to go to college these days. He’s better off if he doesn’t talk to any women when he gets there.
One of criticisms for this movie is the portrayal of women; mainly Amanda. No longer are the women in (Woody) Allen’s
movies just slightly neurotic or finnicky but now straight up evil harpies... in the past Allen was much more able to take as well as he gave. In Annie Hall
, Annie may have issues, but Alvy was just as bad if not worse. In Anything Else
, Amanda is evil and Jerry is as innocent as an angel.
The most toe-curlingly awful moments of The Time Monster
are where Ruth is made a feminist to make her comically annoying. But that's nothing compared to this story, which contrives to have the Doctor be a sexist ass
to Sarah just so she can complain about it. The problem here should be obvious — the show goes out of its way to make a major character sexist just so it can get in a line complaining about sexism. In other words, the show's reaction to feminism is actually to make its major characters more sexist
Its so odd to see Tegan not approach somebody with her usual bad attitude and filthy mouth but I guess even Janet Fielding couldn’t bring herself to throw her weight around in the presence of a living legend like The Nicholas Courtney
. She saves all of her bile for Mawdryn and in some hastily scripted scenes comes across as a right old cow ...Rather wonderfully the one person she cannot brow beat is the Brigadier and he casually (almost perversely) throws as much sexism her way as possible
. Although Tegan (or probably Janet Fielding
) has to have the last word and quietly mutters ‘chauvinist
’ when he is out of sight. It makes me wonder if that for all her objections to the contrary if Tegan is the sort of self punishing individual that would subconsciously seek out a chauvinist to marry.
As far as feminism has come in recent decades, there are still any number of pre-conceptions that exist and are casually perpetuated. Women in positions of authority are particularly likely to be stereotyped. In fact, observers are likely to use the behaviour of women in authority to reinforce and validate their own sexist beliefs.
Indeed, no matter how a woman in authority acts, there’s likely to be a stereotype to account for it. Concerned about those under her? She’s a 'mother
.' Aggressive? She’s a 'ball-buster
.' Intuitive? 'Overly emotional.
' Logical? 'Ice queen
.' It is very easy to fall into the trap of playing into sexist stereotypes because there are so damn many of them. One could easily justify the various zig-zags
taken by the Voyager
writing staff in characterising as attempts to avoid various prat falls. However, swerving to avoid one stereotype means you wind up hitting another.
Hanna Rosin's newly-released The End of Men
(based on a column from The Atlantic
with the same name) argues that, basically, Spice World
was one of the more prescient films of the last fifty years
...men, unable to do any damn thing right
, are regressing to a sort of stunted Daniel Tosh
-esque be-hoodied boy manhood. Soon they will be kept on ranches and farmed for their sperm while the women of the matriarchy hold high minded debates about whether it's okay to require that men taken for walks off of preapproved government Man Reserves should be leashed, or if that's inhumane.
Jesus H. Christ, I feel like I’m on a goddamn merry-go-round here. Once again, feminism DOES NOT mean you don’t love men; feminism means you believe women are equal to men. Period. The End. Someone check to see if Shay-Lean
is awake and is writing all this down, because she’s going to need to remember it for the next time wants to explain Feminism as ‘raising women to power to take men away from the power’. And I know I just typed what she said word-for-word, but it still sounded like Engrish.
Maureen Dowd has only ever remained employed so that the sexist bastards who own the New York He-Man Woman-Hater’s Newsletter
can point to her and go 'gosh, aren’t women and feminists dumb and selfish and evil she-beasts who try and steal your alimony, you hear that Cheryl, I’ll get my kids back, you’ll see!
And despite how mind-numbingly awful she is when trying to handle anything related to gender politics, Dowd always manages to find exciting new lows whenever she turns her syphilis-riddled mind to politics. Endless parades of poorly sublimated daddy issues, deep grudges based on imaginary slights, and just pure concentrated stupid on the level to make one weep for one’s gender
....Jonathan Swift she ain't.
It’s a shame, but not an unsurprising outcome
, that the growth of feminism has given birth to this very extreme branch, but as I have said all these years: if they are not interested in male rights as well as female, they do not uphold the unconditional foundation goal of feminism. Therefore, regardless of how they identify themselves, they are not true feminists. It’s as simple as that – the banner of feminism does not fly with an impaled male organ at its side, it is a banner of equality, a banner that proposes the end to patriarchy – not the rise of a matriarchy.