Quotes: New Speak
open/close all folders
Matt: Stryker’s in the Oval Office asking the president permission for a “special operation” and talking about “school reform.” In my experience, that is pitch-perfect bureaucratic talk.
Chris: That’s the level that Stryker’s at, actually wanting a race war.
Chris: That’s the level that Stryker’s at, actually wanting a race war.
Game consoles were so tainted in the eyes of the fickle public, that when Nintendo called their machine an 'entertainment system' rather than a game console, it sold fucking gangbusters. For you see, the public are fickle but not particularly smart.
A guy who likes to blame everything on the Jews. He's a former Klansman who claims that he left his racist days behind long ago, but that's bullshit. He uses the word "Zionist" more than he uses the word 'the.' It's essentially his subtle way of saying Kike.
—Urban Dictionary on David Duke
Rich and powerful people don't get fired like the rest of us...This is executive speak for "We're firing you because you've become synonymous with perhaps the darkest chapter in the history of our company but you're well-liked so we're going to give you a made-up job on the way out."
—Sam Biddle, "Hacked Sony Antihero Amy Pascal Basically Fired"
Even Christian Science is like “You know, we should really consider changing our name to something less confusing.”
—DListed, "Val Kilmer Isn’t Treating A Tumor In His Throat Because He’s A Hardcore Christian Scientist"
Sound science has two meanings. When used by scientists it means robustly supported science, confirmed by multiple peer-reviewed studies. When used in politics it means ideologically sound science, i.e. a euphemism for industry-funded pseudoscientific bullshit.
Rand Paul is antivaccine. He simply cloaks his antivaccine views in the rhetoric of “health freedom,” as so many with antivaccine views who happen to lean libertarian do. The whole “freedom” thing is what I like to refer to as an antivaccine dog whistle.
—Orac, "Nobody Wants to Admit to Being Anti-Vaccine"
"Imagine being on fire, running up to a firefighter screaming for help, and they hook their hands in their pockets and say, "Actually, before we start, I think you should say you're violently oxidizing. Not all oxidization is bad. I mean, some of my cells are performing oxidation right now, and I think it would be better if we ..."''
The ERA, she told the Washington Star, 'is a takeaway of women’s rights.' It will 'take away the right of the wife in an ongoing marriage, the wife in the home.' Schlafly was obviously using the language of rights in a way that was opposed to the aims of the feminist movement; she was using rights talk to put women back into the home, to keep them as wives and mothers.
—John Quiggin on Phyllis Schlafly
Every time a community springs up supposedly based only on mocking the 'excesses' of 'Tumblr activists,' the moderates who are in it just to make fun of the feminists or anti-racists who are 'actually crazy' find themselves joined by 'redpillers' (i.e. men’s rights activists) and advocates of 'human biodiversity' (a coy euphemism for scientific racism and eugenics).
—Arthur Chu, "Occupying the Throne"
Libertarians are for "individual rights", and against "force" and "fraud" — just as THEY define it. Their use of these words, however, when examined in detail, is not likely to accord with the common meanings of these terms. What person would proclaim themselves in favor of "force and fraud"? One of the little tricks Libertarians use in debate is to confuse the ordinary sense of these words with the meaning as "terms of art" in Libertarian axioms. They try to set up a situation where if you say you're against "force and fraud", then obviously you must agree with Libertarian ideology, since those are the definitions.
—Seth Finkelstein, "Libertarianism Make You Stupid"
No seriously, the biggest block there is to fixing the myriad of things wrong with everything in our society is the fact that a dedicated bloc of our populace reacts like winged howler monkeys whenever an ever-growing list of verboten words are invoked. As such, something like this which is literally the least anyone could do about the problems surrounding rape in
schools this country the world is deemed instantly bad evil wrong and needs to be destroyed simply because it involves 'White House' 'college' and 'sexual'.
—Sadly, No! rebuts Jonah Goldberg's "What War on Women?"
They refer to billionaires as 'job creators' instead of 'human hunters.' They call it a War on Success if you apply basic economic theories to the financial crisis. And they accuse you of communism if you notice that any of this is retarded.
So, what better way to combat this alarming list of school shootings than to redefine the term 'school shooting' itself? By doing this, according to gun-rights activists, you knock off, say, 59 of the 74 school shootings, leaving you with only 15 real, true, legitimate school shootings. ONLY 15! That’s nothing. We can live with that, right? The sad thing is, media outlets are now using this new 'revised' number.
You start out in 1954 by saying, 'Nigger, nigger, nigger.' By 1968 you can't say 'nigger' — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights... You follow me? Because obviously sitting around saying, 'We want to cut this,' is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than 'Nigger, nigger.'
To be 'Orwellian' is to speak with absolute clarity, to be succinct, to explain what the event is, to talk about what triggers something happening… and to do so without any pejorative whatsoever!
—Spin doctor Frank Luntz evokes Poe's Law
As societies grow decadent, the language grows decadent, too. Words are used to disguise, not to illuminate, action: you liberate a city by destroying it. Words are to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests.
Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge.
Language has always been important in politics, but language is incredibly important to the present political struggle. Because if you can establish an atmosphere in which information doesn't mean anything, then there is no objective reality. The first show we did, a year ago, was our thesis statement: What you wish to be true is all that matters, regardless of the facts. Of course, at the time, we thought we were being farcical.
The United States, to an unusual extent, is a business-run society, more so than others. The business classes are very class-conscious...We don’t use the term 'working class' here because it’s a taboo term. You’re supposed to say 'middle class,' because it helps diminish the understanding that there’s a class war going on.
Do not allow others to dictate the debate by injecting their own politically correct language like: higher order thinking skills, site-based management or gender norming. It's a smokescreen. Insist on using plain English in your debates.
—Tom DeWeese, American education activist.