|
Laconic Main PlayingWith Quotes main index Narrative
|
 There are some things stupid arguments can't solve. For everything else, there's The Hitler Card. *
Also known as "Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies". Originated by Richard Sexton, and popularized by Mike Godwin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and of the Wikimedia Foundation until 2010) in 1990 in the form:
As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
Reformulated in the Net.Legends FAQ s "Usenet Rule #4":
"Any off-topic mention of Hitler or Nazis will cause the thread it is mentioned in to come to an irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on UseNet has a constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention."
The usage of Godwin's Law also has "Henderson's Law" as a corollary, referring to an observation by Joel Henderson that while Mike Godwin specifically stated this to pertain to "gratuitous Hitler-comparisons", Godwin's Law has been frivolously thrown at any comparison no matter how accurate or on-point. Case example: Jon Stewart of The Daily Show criticizing comparisons to Hitler.
Note that the Law is not supposed to apply to serious discussions of Fascist Germany or its policies, but rather describes the logical fallacy of Hitler/Nazi comparisons. The most common forms of this are "The Nazis supported X, therefore X is bad", or alternatively, "The Nazis opposed X, therefore X is good". Whether using "Nazi" as a random insult falls under the Law is a matter of debate. Unfortunately, this has become so popular as to come full-circle, making any discussion of totalitarian regimes susceptible to "HAY GODWIN'S LAW HURR".
It is generally accepted that whoever is the first to play the "Hitler card" has lost the argument as well as any trace of respect, as having to resort to comparing your adversary to the most infamous mass-murdering dictator in history generally means you've run out of better arguments. As Quirk's Exception points out, attempting to invoke Godwin's Law intentionally in order to force-terminate a thread rarely works. All the same, shouting "Hitler!" is a fun way to express your opinion that a thread should be put to rest. Of course, it's also helping Hitler indirectly, as his greatest expressed wish was to be remembered forever, which means that you're just as bad as Hitler, you horrible Nazi-bastard. However, this corollary is not in the law itself. Likewise, trying to bait your opponent into breaking the law is poor form too.
Recent events in the Harry Potter fandom have led Fandom_Wank to coin the Pacific Theater Corollary, in which someone invokes the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the same way. FandomWank also gave us this excellent antidote to frivolous Nazi comparisons.
Occasionally Stalin is referenced, often by people who are aware of Godwin's Law but want to convey a similar message; in this case, this might slip into the Commie Nazis trope. Some people will be topical and use Osama bin Laden or slavery (especially America's brand of it) as the canonical ultimate evil. However, any of these can also be seen to have violated Godwin's Law.
In fan circles, there's the "true fan" argument, in which anyone who plays the "true fan" card automatically loses the argument:
or argumentum ad Hitlerum, coined by ethical philosopher Leo Strauss in 1953. It means pretty much the same as Godwin's Law: "A view is not refuted by the fact that it happens to have been shared by Hitler."
George Orwell said something similar in his 1946 essay, "Politics and the English Language", where he noted the new definition of fascism had pretty much become "anything you don't agree with".
This trope is (perhaps not surprisingly, given human nature) Older than They Think. Prior to the 1940s, the go-to villains were generally Biblical, such as the Pharaoh of the Exodus, Pontius Pilate, or Judas.
As a side note, Quirk's Exception holds that "Intentional invocation of this so-called "Nazi Clause" is ineffectual." Thus, a post consisting of ""Hitler!" Ha! The thread is over!" is invalid.
Showcased on QI as "Godwin's Rule", giving an example of Hitler's love of animals (and disgust of fox hunting) as a fallacious reason to keep fox hunting legal.
Heavily overlaps with demonization and can be seen as its modern, secular adaptation (in public consciousness, Hitler has pretty much displaced the Devil as a personification of ultimate evil). See also Hitler Ate Sugar and Abomination Accusation Attack. Not to be confused with Godwin's Law Of Time Travel. Often results in Artistic License - History. Can be perhaps justifiably invoked when someone purports to be Just Following Orders, as the Nazis are a rather notorious example of that defense being rejected. It might also be justified when seriously discussing genocide, since the Holocaust is pretty much the Trope Codifier that most other genocides are measured against.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
alternative title(s): Ptitle7vljslfu
Privacy Policy
0