troperville

tools

toys


main index

Narrative

Genre

Media

Topical Tropes

Other Categories

TV Tropes Org
random
Kickstarter Message
TV Tropes Needs Your Help
X
Big things are happening on TV Tropes! New admins, new designs, fewer ads, mobile versions, beta testing opportunities, thematic discovery engine, fun trope tools and toys, and much more - Learn how to help here and discuss here.
View Kickstarter Project
Fallacy Of Division
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts."
Aristotle, averting the fallacy.

Fallacy of Division:

Generalizing from a whole to the parts.

A colony of ants can destroy a tree.
Therefore, this ant can destroy that tree.

Pretty much opposite to Fallacy Of Composition, which argues that the whole must have the same traits as the sum of its parts, among other things. In reality, it depends on the parts; peanut butter and chocolate might taste better together than any one component, while ketchup and chocolate, not so much.

Examples:

Comic Books
  • This was responsible for The Dark Age of Comic Books. Watchmen and The Dark Knight Returns were dark, edgy, and had a lot of moral ambiguity, and they were widely praised and treated as classics. So dark, edgy things are automatically good, even in the absence of intelligent, thoughtful plots and well-rounded characters, right?

Film
  • Trail of the Pink Panther, Curse of the Pink Panther, Son of the Pink Panther: Everyone likes a Pink Panther movie regardless of whether Inspector Clouseau (as played by Peter Sellers) is actually in it, right?
  • The film studio in Looney Tunes: Back in Action makes this fallacy by firing Daffy Duck from their next movie, based on the fact that Bugs Bunny has far more fans than he does. It ends up a spectacular failure without the classic Bugs/Daffy interaction.
  • Star Wars: The Clone Wars: a Clone Wars movie? The Warsies will love it, even though it is not directed by Genndy Tartakovsky or George Lucas and it's CGI. (The derivated TV series fared better, though)

Live-Action TV
  • Spinoffs are frequently based on such logic. When a Long Runner wraps, producers often try to build a new series around one or more characters.
    • The supposed Seinfeld curse is a classic example disproving this fallacy.
    • Joey: A spin-off of Friends that flopped horribly. Apparently the developers fell afoul of this fallacy.
    • There are some notable aversions of this as well. Frasier matched its predecessor's run and won a ton of Emmys and acclaim. The Jeffersons ran longer than its predecssor.
  • "Hey, MythBusters is popular, and it has explosions in just about every episode! Let's make a show centered around Stuff Blowing Up!"
    • Leads to a great deal of Follow the Leader behavior. For any successful premise, particularly in cheap-to-produce game shows and reality shows, expect to see numerous imitators.
  • Subverted in the M*A*S*H episode "Rumor at the Top" in which the gang thought the Army was planning to send one of them to a new M*A*S*H being set up because the 4077th was so efficient. However, it turned out that the Army was planning no such thing as they realized that the 4077th only worked so well because of the combination of people.
    • Applied full-force to the M*A*S*H television franchise itself, which had two unsuccessful spinoffs - AfterMASH and W*A*L*T*E*R - that, for the most part, banked on the popularity of the second-tier cast and connections to the parent show itself. A third, Trapper John, M.D., was more successful than the other two, but did not include any of the original actors and was legally recognized as a spinoff of the movie.

Music
  • Many side-projects and solo works made by musicians who are/were part of bands that have already established a popular reputation can fall into this when they don't live up to the glory of their other/former, more popular band. i.e. Sid Vicious' solo project and Billy Corgan's band Zwan.'

Professional Wrestling
  • This trope's application is a sure sign that any given promotion or region's tag team and or trios have become devalued. Thankfully, as pro wrestling is a long game, it isn't too hard to fix.
  • SHIMMER had an amusing example. Mercedes Martinez was known for beating Lacey whenever she could get her one on one in WXW and IWA Mid-South, while Rain put up a valiant effort(for her standards) against Sara Del Rey, she was so physically outclassed Rain couldn't even walk after their match was finished, having to crawl out of the arena. So what happens when Martinez and Del Rey take on the Minnesota Home Wrecking Crew Together? Rain and Lacey win.
  • In WWE, The Shield were nigh unstoppable as a unit, no matter how many main event wrestlers were thrown their way. Brothers Of Destruction\Team Hell No? Not enough. But give one of them to Daniel Bryan or The Undertaker? It is only somewhat competitive with Bryan/Taker winning handily. Seth Rollins, Dean Ambrose and Roman Reigns did eventually become main eventers in their own right though...eventually.

Real Life
  • Happens in sports all the time. It's almost guaranteed that some starter from a championship team, regardless of how much they contributed to the actual championship, will land a huge contract that next off-season.
    • One cliched sports saying is "a champion team will beat a team of champions".
    • In tennis, it is rare for two top-ranked singles players to be as successful as a doubles combination, and vice versa.
  • Can be a problem in social justice discussions. Just because Group A is more powerful and wealthy than Group B, does not necessarily mean each and every individual member of Group A is more powerful and wealthy than every individual in Group B.

Fallacy Of CompositionLogical FallaciesFalse Cause
Fallacy Of CompositionLogic TropesFalse Cause

random
TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy
14013
7