have exceptions. Sometimes, a writer uses a situation that seems indelibly married to a trope, but the trope never appears. It's not a Subverted Trope
, because the lack of trope is never pointed out. Nor is it a Lampshade Hanging
, because the presence of trope is never pointed out. The trope just isn't there.
That is the core meaning of "averted". The writer just went past the trope. They ignored it, they forgot it existed, or it wasn't even a trope at all in their culture.
Aversions should ALMOST NEVER be listed on trope pages. 99.9% of the time they are the exact same thing as just not using the trope. Generally, only nigh Omnipresent Tropes, or aversion-only tropes should have aversions listed as examples. Simply not using a trope does not mean a work is an example of a trope.
Example of the difference between subverting
and averting a trope:
Take the trope Incredibly Obvious Bug
. The trope is that listening and tracking devices are huge and obvious with blinking lights, instead of being small, stealthy, and hidden.
If a trope was never averted in the past but is commonly averted now, you may have an Evolving Trope
, Cyclic Trope
, or Forgotten Trope
Even though There Is No Such Thing as Notability
, averting is generally not an example for mentioning on a trope page, except for tropes that are so common
that the list of aversions is actually shorter, such as Limited Wardrobe
. The reason is that different people have different expectations. For example, say there is an action movie that does not have a single instance of Stuff Blowing Up
. Just because you expect it does not mean that it was subverted or used in any manner. If it was not used, then it is not an example. We don't want to have to scroll through examples like:
- Averted in Harry Potter, where nothing like this ever happens.
On the other hand, Space Is Noisy
is so incredibly common in science fiction (especially TV and film
) that a work that manages to avoid it is worth mentioning.
So aversions worth mentioning will generally follow this pattern: A supermajority of works that have element A will also have trope A, but work W has element A without trope A. If the number of aversions on a tropes page consist of at least a third of the examples, perhaps averting the trope isn't as notable as initially thought.
Remember — just because a trope does not come into play doesn't make it averted. It is when you would very much expect the trope in a work but despite there being plenty of opportunity
for it, it is never used. Many tropes have an inverse of themselves — if the inverse is applicable instead, then it's just a different trope being used.
Using words like averted hard
, brutally averted, and other such intensifiers is considered Word Cruft
, and thus should be avoided.
In some occassions, an averted trope is basically in between the straight and the inverted trope. This doesn't count as downplay as long as the trope isn't there.
See Playing with a Trope
for a comparison with the ways that a trope can actually be used.
Not to be confused with a completely unrelated game where you "evert" to reach the goal.