->''"I much prefer history, true or feigned, with its varied applicability to the thought and experience of readers. I think that many confuse 'applicability' with 'allegory'; but one resides in the freedom of the reader, and the other resides in the purposed domination of the author."''
-->-- '''Creator/JRRTolkien'''

When it comes to writing thematic stories, there are essentially two methods to go about it: {{allegory}} or applicability. Which method you use will depend on how obvious you want your theme to be.

In an allegory, it's the author who supports only one interpretation of the work as canon. Creator/JRRTolkien himself hated formal allegory because the reader was forced to see nothing but the author's point of view on what they considered the theme. In answer to the many allegorical readings of the ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' -- which he eventually got tired of getting letters about -- he stated the book was not an allegory, but had ''applicability'' -- the story simply happened to be comparable and applicable to many RealLife issues.

Applicability encourages the reader to interpret what the theme of any given work is. Sometimes a reader's interpretation of the meaning of the story is very different from the authorial intent. {{Anvilicious}} works with high applicability can see alternate interpretations on part of the audience. Put another way, applicable works support multiple interpretations, only some of which are those that the author specifically intended. Applicability can give a fictional work different interpretations even on different readings, and is one reason AlternateCharacterInterpretation and WildMassGuessing are such active topics in fandoms.

Compare LowestCommonDenominator. DeathOfTheAuthor is the enforcement of this trope, regardless of authorial intent. Contrast with TheWalrusWasPaul, where the audience tries to find meaning in a work when in fact the work isn't ''supposed'' to have a hidden meaning -- the author's just messing with them.

Often leads to PeripheryDemographic, MisaimedFandom, {{Shipping}}, BrokenBase, and/or InternetBackdraft. This is the root of many an EpilepticTree. See also EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory, WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical, ValuesResonance.


[[folder:Anime and Manga]]
* In ''Anime/RevolutionaryGirlUtena'', there are a lot of feminist themes revolving around the character of Anthy, but due to the fact that she is dark-skinned, westerners (particularly Americans) may see racial themes there as well.
* In ''Manga/FullMetalAlchemist'', the Amestrian [[FinalSolution war of genocide]] against the Ishbalan minority is so widely applicable that nobody can seem to agree on which real-life conflict it's supposed to be referencing. Is it [[ANaziByAnyOtherName Nazis]] vs. Jews? [[TheWarOnTerror The West vs. the Islamic world]]? [[WordOfGod Arakawa herself said]] that the Ishbalans were partly inspired by the Ainu, an indigenous ethnic group who suffered persecution and cultural genocide in Japan.
%%* ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' has been the object of academic analysis, like in this essay: ''[[http://labsome.rmit.edu.au/files/simongoughthesis.pdf Remember Madoka: Trangressing the Magical Girl]]''.
* Believe it or not, ''Anime/DragonBallZ''. Some fans within the black community relate to Goku as an underdog who discovers his true heritage and learns more about his culture, and see themselves in him and his group of friends, whereas some fans within the Latino community see him as a hardworking immigrant, Gohan as his first-gen immigrant son, and Vegeta as someone who immigrated as an adult and struggles to adapt. Read this article (and some of the comments) for more details: https://kotaku.com/why-black-men-love-dragon-ball-z-1820481429

[[folder:Comic Books]]
* ''Comicbook/{{Watchmen}}''. Go to [[Headscratchers/{{Watchmen}} the Headscratchers page for it]], and you'll see people who see Rorschach as the only heroic character, people who see Rorschach as the ''least'' sympathetic of all the characters, people who argue over exactly how long [[spoiler:Ozymandias's]] peace will last (and whether or not he was justified), people disgusted by Dr Manhattan's revelation over [[spoiler:the Comedian and Sally Jupiter getting together after he attempted to rape her]], and people who see that moment as a [[SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments heartwarming moment]]. Creator/AlanMoore has officially stated that he was very much aiming for this, and compared his vision for the book to a diamond with many different facets, where any reader can look through any of the facets that they choose and still get a completely consistent and coherent view of the story and all the events in it.
* Invoked and discussed InUniverse by Creator/AlanMoore in Issue 7 of ''ComicBook/{{Providence}}''. After seeing Pitman's paintings, Robert Black puts on his amateur art critic hat and theorizes ghouls/zombies and other beings as metaphors for middle-class fears of class uprising. Pitman notes that he's never seen things that way but SureLetsGoWithThat.
* Anti-mutant prejudice in ''ComicBook/XMen'' can stand in for a metaphor for any number of RealLife prejudices. Fans have tended to take this very literally and argue about what the "original meaning" was and how it has changed. WordOfGod has confirmed, upon occasion, that individual writers have used it for a specific metaphorical purpose (Creator/GrantMorrison has said that he used his run to comment to the {{Demonization}} of young people. Not even this squares completely with his comics, but it makes a lot more sense if you [[DracoInLeatherPants sympathize way too much with Quentin Quire]]). But that does not mean that every writer has used it as a metaphor, or has used it for the same one every time. That it has been so readily used as allegory for such diverging issues as racial tensions, LGBT struggles, [=McCarthyism=], the Cold War, and generational conflict is proof enough of this. Interestingly, the movie series takes it at face-value: normal [[ApocalypseHow humans are terrified of going extinct]], and the prospect of actually siring the species that will replace us is unthinkable, thus the fear and hatred.

[[folder:Films -- Animated]]
* Invoked by co-director Phil Lord for ''WesternAnimation/TheLEGOMovie''. He openly stated that "My dream is to have terrible undergraduate term papers written about the movie."
* ''Disney/{{Frozen}}:''
** The song "Let it Go" is about the joy and relief of no longer hiding a secret about yourself. This is open to interpretations including, but not limited to, coming out of the closet, either as gay, lesbian or bisexual ''or'' as transgender.
** Elsa has a personal secret which isolates her from her family, and is never seen eating. This did not go un-noticed by anorexics. John Lasseter has also emphasized the parallels between Elsa's struggle with her powers and his own son's struggle with diabetes.
** Elsa's lack of love interest or any romantic inclinations in the films has led to speculation that she could be homosexual, bisexual or even asexual.
** People who have autism and Asperger's often identify with Elsa and her "Let It Go" song. She was just born different from the rest, the majority of people who weren't born different react negatively to her difference, and she just wants to be accepted.
** In the same vein, people with mental illnesses often identify with Elsa's journey. Director Jennifer Lee has described "anxiety and depression" as major themes of the film, and while she didn't necessarily mean "clinical" anxiety and depression, the applicability is still there. People with disorders such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder can also relate to her, as they deal with the fear of having violent psychotic episodes and hurting loved ones as Elsa fears hurting Anna and others with her emotion-fueled ice powers.
** On a simpler level, Elsa and Anna's relationship also reflects a typical coming-of-age journey shared by older and younger siblings, as director Lee did with her own older sister. As small children the siblings are close; then the older sibling shuts out the {{Annoying Younger Sibling}} as s/he becomes a teenager, develops more "grown up" interests, and becomes absorbed in his/her own adolescent moodiness and coming-of-age process; but when they're both mature adults, they can become close again.
* ''Disney/{{Zootopia}}'' was intended to examine the effects of bias in a society where two groups (predator and prey) had a historical tension between them. While the creative team worked hard to avoid any direct racial analogues in the film, that didn't stop many from seeing implications of simple racism, white supremacy, social justice circles, police brutality, the LGBT movement, patriarchy, political conflict between the right and left wings, election debates, and even the War on Drugs.

[[folder:Films -- Live-Action]]
* ''Film/{{Prometheus}}'' was ''designed'' for WildMassGuessing. One moment of IdiotBall could mean an hour of theorizing behind why it is so.
%%* Anything by Creator/DavidLynch.
* ''Film/BattlesWithoutHonorAndHumanity'' is both a GenreDeconstruction of yakuza films and a look at how economic downturns and trickle-down economics affect poorer classes, with much of the Yakuza violence in the beginning being sparked by class inequality and desperation.
* ''Film/TheDayTheEarthCaughtFire'' (1962) was made long before global warming and climate change became big issues, but is still about climate change which has been caused accidentally by technology (simultaneous nuclear tests at the north and south poles change the tilt of the Earth's axis).
* ''Film/TheMatrix'', a film about the reality we know being a lie designed to enslave us, has attracted fans from all over the spectrum, from LGBT people who see it as a metaphor for being trapped by heteronormative sexual norms (the film's creators both being [[{{Transgender}} transgender]], albeit closeted at the time), to far-right activists who embraced the RedPillBluePill scene as a rallying cry, to plain old teen outcasts wishing to escape from their [[StepfordSuburbia boring suburban life]]. [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGopT-KNvlM This episode]] of ''[[Creator/BobChipman Really That Good]]'' goes into more detail on how the film's applicability made its message so universal for a generation of '90s teenagers.
* ''Film/TheyLive''. Creator/JohnCarpenter intended it as a satire of Reaganism and consumer capitalism, but its plot, about evil space aliens [[AlienInvasion infiltrating Earth]] and {{brainwash|ed}}ing the populace with subliminal messages to turn them into consumerist sheep, has naturally attracted a large ConspiracyTheorist fandom, one that Carpenter has mixed feelings about. (He specifically told [[ThoseWackyNazis neo-Nazi]] fans of the film to [[https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2017/jan/09/they-live-john-carpenter-neo-nazis go to hell]].)

* Creator/JRRTolkien kind of coined the word, as seen in the quote at the top. He always denied his Middle-earth works being an allegory for anything, but said that because they were so archetypal and universal (literally a lost mythology), their stories and themes could be compared and ''applied'' to many real/historical stories and issues. It's one of the reasons why ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'' is so difficult to pigeonhole and figure out what the theme is -- he didn't put [[{{Anvilicious}} any obvious one]] in. This explains why people from a wide spectrum of viewpoints tend to read the same book and yet get widely different interpretations of the theme of the book. This lack of an obvious theme also makes it hard for some readers to get into the books because they expect the books [[{{Anvilicious}} to clearly show what theme it is]].
** In later editions of the book, Tolkien specifically goes into detail about the incorrect notion of his books being an allegory for UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, which was probably a comparison he was tired of. He argued that if his book were based on UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, Saruman would've gone into Mordor during the chaos and found out the knowledge needed to make his own Ring of Power. The War for the Ring would end up being a war of EvilVersusEvil with Hobbits being destroyed in the process. It even goes a bit further, as he stated in the foreword of the book that most of the things people tie to WWII were written before the war even started.
** The Éowyn subplot can remind western readers of the story of UsefulNotes/JoanOfArc. To Chinese readers Éowyn's story can easily be seen as a version of the story of Hua Mulan.
** In a letter, a fan asked Tolkien if the flying steeds of the Nazgûl (large naked, leather-winged birdlike monsters ) were pterodactyls. His reply was that if that's what the reader ''thought they were'', it could be a valid interpretation of the text.
** On the cast commentary for the ''Lord of the Rings'' movies, Sir Creator/IanMcKellen makes tacit reference to the "[[HeterosexualLifePartners innocent physical affection]]" displayed by Sam towards Frodo in the book and the rather famous [[HoYay modern interpretation]] of it. Bean and Wood also comment on a specific scene, mentioning a fan who wrote in to thank them for including a nod to this rather than avoiding it.
* Miguel de Cervantes originally wrote ''Literature/DonQuixote'' as a spoof of KnightErrant tales, but its hero was interpreted as idealism personified for many readers. Annoyed, Cervantes wrote a sequel to hammer home the point [[MisaimedFandom the readers apparently missed]]. Much to his shock, the second half was considered more brilliant and was better-received. Different ages have tended to read different things into the novel. When first published, it was usually interpreted as a comic novel. After the French Revolution it was popular in part due to its central ethic that individuals can be right while society is quite wrong and seen as disenchanting -- not comic at all. In the 19th century it was seen as a social commentary, and the Russian's interpretation of Literature/DonQuixote has shadows of the MessiahCreep, but no one could easily tell "whose side Cervantes was on".
** Literary critic Harold Bloom wrote in his article, [[http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2003/dec/13/classics.miguelcervantes "The Knight in the Mirror"]]: ''"The aesthetic wonder is ... when we stand back from the huge book and ponder its shape and endless range of meaning. No critic's account of Cervantes's masterpiece agrees with, or even resembles, any other critic's impressions. Don Quixote is a mirror held up not to nature, but to the reader. How can this bashed and mocked knight errant be, as he is, a universal paradigm?"'' That means that every reader will interpret ''Literature/DonQuixote'' on his own way, and all of those interpretations will be valid. It also means that none of them could be valid, because every readerís impression ''of himself is reflected by the novel''.
** This was parodied by Creator/JorgeLuisBorges in "Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote." The story is about a man who attempts to write a novel ''identical'' to Literature/DonQuixote, from a modern perspective.
* ''Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz'' is a case of confusing applicability with allegory. The connection between ''The Wonderful Wizard of Oz'' and the then-contemporary American political landscape was not even raised until 1963, when summer school teacher Henry Littlefield, while trying to teach the 1896 Presidential election and the turn-of-the-century Populist movement to bored history students, stumbled upon the idea of using the characters and events of ''The Wizard of Oz'' as metaphors to teach the concepts. He and his students made a number of connections - the Scarecrow represented the farmers, the Tin Woodman the factory workers, the Wizard was President UsefulNotes/GroverCleveland or Republican presidential candidate UsefulNotes/WilliamMcKinley, the Cowardly Lion was Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan, the silver shoes were the silver standard, the yellow brick road the gold standard, and so on - and Littlefield eventually wrote an article, "The Wizard of Oz: A Parable on Populism," which was published in the magazine American Quarterly in 1964. You can read this article [[http://www.amphigory.com/oz.htm here]]. Unfortunately, this was eventually taken to mean that Baum wrote the book as an allegory for the political landscape at the turn of the century despite the fact Littlefield believed Baum had no political agenda when he wrote the book.
* Umberto Eco is a major pioneer in this technique. ''Literature/TheNameOfTheRose'' itself is about this; the detective character is constantly trying to interpret the clues in their proper contexts. There are so many ways to read the book that, like the symbolic rose, the conflicting interpretations make it practically meaningless. All the interpretations any reader gets are all valid. The same holds true for ''Literature/FoucaultsPendulum''. In one of his essays, Eco wrote that even giving a work of fiction a name is to determine the reader's interpretation of it too much.
* [[http://www.salon.com/1999/12/06/borges/ This essay]], which argues that Argentinian author Creator/JorgeLuisBorges's biggest influence was the internet, which was invented four years after he died.
* A huge number of different interpretations exist as to what Creator/HunterSThompson was trying to say with ''Literature/FearAndLoathingInLasVegas'', regarding whether it's supposed to be a comedy, serious, political, or just an exaggeration of things Thompson actually did. The reality is that they are ''all'' right, as the whole point of Gonzo journalism is to allow the reader to be put in the same frame of mind as the author, whatever the author was thinking at the time. In the case of Thompson, a man who was politically astute, had a great sense of humor, and was known for being over the top, this leads to a book much like him: something equal parts genius, lunatic, and poet.
* [[http://www.cracked.com/article_18787_6-books-everyone-including-your-english-teacher-got-wrong.html This article]] from Website/{{Cracked}} lists several books whose main theme was interpreted in a completely different manner than expected.
* Several books have been written on the subject of ''Literature/HarryPotter'' symbolism, to the point where there is now a greater body of work devoted to explaining ''Harry Potter'' than there is ''Harry Potter'' to explain. Whether Harry goes on a Grail Quest, sacrifices himself as a Christ figure, purifies his soul with alchemy, or re-enacts a mythological journey to the Underworld, there's probably a book explaining it somewhere.
* Creator/GuyGavrielKay commented that from South Korea to Poland to Quebec people have been praising him for basing the plot of ''Literature/{{Tigana}}'' on their national history. For reference, he based it on Renaissance-era Italy. His writing philosophy is that history-inspired fantasy, among other things, lets a story have more of a universal appeal than mundane historical fiction would.
* Creator/RoaldDahl's ''Literature/CharlieAndTheChocolateFactory'' has enough of this going on that Lucy Mangan's MilestoneCelebration retrospective ''Inside Charlie's Chocolate Factory'' devotes two sidebars to examining the Marxist and Freudian interpretations (albeit with tongue planted firmly in cheek!).
* Hans Christian Andersen's ''Literature/TheLittleMermaid'' is open to many allegorical interpretations, as are its various adaptations.
** The undersea world of the merfolk can be seen to represent the pagan world, while the human world represents Christianity, which requires more sacrifices and hardship than paganism but which promises an immortal soul and rewards after death.
** The undersea world can also represent childhood while the human world represents adulthood, with the mermaid's journey either portrayed as tragic InnocenceLost (as in the original tale and the opera ''Rusalka'') or as leaving behind the limits of childhood to embrace the new joys and freedom of adulthood (as in [[Disney/TheLittleMermaid the Disney film]]).
** The two incompatible worlds can also represent different social classes, with the mermaid as a literally lower-born person, doomed to be snubbed by the humans who represent the upper class. This arguably reflects the working class-born Andersen's "fish out of water" feelings among the elite. The loose adaptation ''Theatre/OnceOnThisIsland'' runs with this by explicitly making the story about peasants vs. Grand Hommes instead of merfolk vs. humans.
** In the same vein, the two worlds can represent different races, either with the merfolk as the minority race and the humans as the privileged majority who snubs them (the easier interpretation of the original tale, which again, ''Theatre/OnceOnThisIsland'' makes explicit), or with the merfolk as the bigoted majority and the mermaid as an open-minded individual who sees the value in a different culture (as in the Disney film).
** Both the original tale and Disney's are open to feminist interpretations too: either "Don't throw everything away for a man, or you'll be doomed" (the original) or "Do leave behind your oppressive old life and its patriarchal rules to build the life you choose, with the romantic partner you choose" (the Disney film).
** The story is also very much open to a queer reading. Andersen was bisexual and is thought to have partly based the tale on his own unrequited love for another man. The themes of forbidden love, of being literally unable to speak those feelings, and of being rejected in favor of a more "conventional" partner are easy to read in that light. So is the theme of parental opposition that the Disney version emphasizes. The fact that the mermaid literally wants to change her body also brings to mind the experiences of transgender people, especially in the Disney film, where Ariel doesn't just want to become human for love but distinctly wants to ''be'' human and have every human experience from the start.

[[folder:Live Action TV]]
* ''Series/TheBigBangTheory'' is a show that runs with nerd stereotypes but does so in such a way that they don't all fall into the exact same character mold. As a result a lot of people are able to find themselves in the characters despite being on the extreme end of "smart people." Sheldon's rampant ScheduleFanatic and SuperOCD behavior lead many people to assume he has UsefulNotes/AspergerSyndrome, and there's much debate about whether he's a positive or negative portrayal of the condition. Leonard is timid and a pushover while trying to stay a NiceGuy. Howard is a CasanovaWannabe who has a hard time understanding why women aren't falling for [[ExtravertedNerd his excitable energy]]. Raj is painfully shy around women to the point [[ShrinkingViolet he can't even speak in their presence]], though he later gets somewhat better. And Penny, the only non-nerd/non-genius of the cast, is easily overwhelmed by the nerd topics and science talk and often ends up the odd one out. It's covering this wide spectrum of personalities that lead many reviewers to speculate this is the reason behind the show's success.
* ''Series/{{The 100}}'' features a lot of political, cultural, and military conflicts that people have compared to World War II, the colonization of the Americas, modern generational conflicts, China's One Child policy, American slavery, and others. However, in most cases it's hard to make a one-to-one parallel line up, and even if you ''could'', the show generally refuses to make definitive moral statements, preferring to have characters take conflicting stances on various issues, and leaving it up to the audience to decide who's right.
* ''Series/{{Defiance}}:'' The backstory bears a resemblance to the European refugee crisis of 2015: an international coalition (Earth/the European nations) finds itself having to deal with large numbers of desperate people (the Votan/refugees and migrants). This is despite the fact that the show began in 20'''13'''. Of course that could be as much ValuesResonance as this trope: The Syrian Civil War is far from the first war to displace a large number of war refugees, and nor will it be the last.
* Though ''Series/DoctorWho'' occasionally goes into straight-up political allegory, such as Seventh Doctor story ''[[Recap/DoctorWhoS25E2TheHappinessPatrol The Happiness Patrol]]'' bashing UsefulNotes/MargaretThatcher or Twelfth Doctor two-part story ''[[Recap/DoctorWhoS35E7TheZygonInvasion The Zygon Invasion/The Zygon Inversion]]'' bashing [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement certain American political ideas]], the show generally stays on the applicability end of things-it's a ScienceFiction FairyTale with an ever-changing cast and stories that can be set anywhere from Earth's distant past to a planet halfway across the universe, and the stories vary from horror to comedic, so anyone with any political, economic, social, ethical, or religious view can find ''something'' in the show's 50+ year history to back it up. And that's not even counting the colossal expanded universe.

* The Music/{{Eagles}}'s song "Hotel California" has several interpretations due to the way the lyrics were written. Don Henley called it "our interpretation of the high life in Los Angeles" and later reiterated "it's basically a song about the dark underbelly of the American dream and about excess in America, which is something we knew a lot about." Still it's interpreted as an allegory of cocaine addiction, Satanism, or a mental hospital.
* Music/TheBeatles:
** Music/PaulMcCartney wrote a song in support of the American UsefulNotes/CivilRightsMovement. He changed it from "Black Girl" to "Black Bird" in the spirit of this trope -- in his words, "so you could apply it to your own problems".
** Paul's mom was the inspiration for the "Mother Mary" lyric from "Let It Be". When asked if the song referred to the Virgin Mary, [=McCartney=] has typically answered the question by assuring his fans that they can interpret the song however they would like.
* Music/{{U2}}'s music is known for its wide range of interpretations, be it religious or secular, universal or personal, literary or pop-cultural.
* Music/ImagineDragons has produced several songs that encouraged multiple theories about their meanings. To quote the frontman:
-->'''Dan Reynolds:''' I always like to leave art and music open to interpretation.
* Music/DreamTheater's songs are well known for being able to be interpenetrated in different ways.

* ''Theatre/TheCrucible'' by Arthur Miller. At the time it was staged during the witch hunts of TheFifties, Miller strenuously denied that it was written as an allegory concerning the activities of Senator Joseph [=McCarthy=], who became notorious for his excessive zeal in rooting out Communist sympathizers. When the play, ''Theatre/TheCrucible'', was staged in China in the early 1980s, people had just recovered from the turmoil of the UsefulNotes/CulturalRevolution. During that time, UsefulNotes/MaoZedong had a policy of stamping out everything that he deemed old and useless, like Taoism. The Chinese found similarities between the events of the Cultural Revolution and ''The Crucible'', which is why the play received such a warm welcome there. The play was certainly a reaction to and commentary on the activities of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, but Miller dealt with it as a series of broad, timeless themes, rather than as a direct allegory for any particular series of events. Very little can be read as directly symbolic of any contemporary event; rather, the content is archetypal in nature.
* Creator/WilliamShakespeare is a wonderful case for this. All of his plays have been subject to multiple interpretations throughout history and even argued over today on Wiki/ThisVeryWiki. There's so little in the way of clear stage directions, or of the Bard's own writings, to be sure of what he thought of anything. For examples:
** Does ''Theatre/{{Hamlet}}'' [[ItsNotYouItsMyEnemies really love Ophelia at all]] or [[AllLoveIsUnrequited does he just barely tolerate her]] -- and what's the deal with Hamlet himself? Why can't he get his act together -- [[CrouchingMoronHiddenBadass or is his act]] ''[[ObfuscatingStupidity always]]'' together?
** ''Theatre/TheTamingOfTheShrew'': Does it really say that a man should break an unruly wife like a horse, or is it a StealthParody that leaves the two main characters ready to live as real partners? It's further confused by the framing device of the story being told just to screw with a random stranger.
%%** ''Theatre/TheMerchantOfVenice'': And ''[[AlternateCharacterInterpretation what about Shylock?]]''
** Is ''Theatre/TitusAndronicus'' supposed to be his darkest, most disturbing work, or is it a DeadBabyComedy that mocks over the top morbidity in theater?
** Shakespeare's works also lend themselves to ''adding'' allegories to make for an interesting adaptation. The Creator/IanMcKellen [[Film/RichardIII 1995 film version]] of ''Theatre/RichardIII'' reinterprets the play as a [[ANaziByAnyOtherName Nazi]] allegory, ''Theatre/WestSideStory'' uses the plot of ''Theatre/RomeoAndJuliet'' to address racially-driven gang violence in UsefulNotes/NewYorkCity, and many modern versions of ''Theatre/{{Othello}}'' put more focus on Othello's status as a racial minority in a MalignedMixedMarriage.
* Creator/BertoltBrecht: every single play, explicitly so. Especially the songs. To illustrate: the song "Music/PirateJenny" from ''Theatre/TheThreepennyOpera'' has been used as a sociopolitical allegory by Nina Simone, Music/BobDylan, Creator/AlanMoore, [[Film/{{Dogville}} Lars von Trier]], [[Webcomic/CatAndGirl Dorothy Gambell]] and Anarchy Comics. Brecht would have probably approved of ''all'' of the above; maybe not for their individual message, but for the fact that he inspired later authors to think for themselves and appropriate his texts in their own social contexts, which is exactly what he wrote them for. He also applied this to all literature ''before'' him, though, stealing poems and plays left and right because he considered ''everything'' applicable and "common commodity". After being found out, he casually said he couldn't be bothered to spend time thinking about intellectual property when he had art to do, and besides, he expected (and wanted) people to do the same with ''his'' work.

[[folder:Video Games]]
* ''VideoGame/TheLegendOfZeldaMajorasMask'':
** Is the game an adventure or a mystery? The one that draws you into the story (or out of it) on will directly have an effect how much you enjoy the experience.
** The dungeons and subplots, when played in order, line up with the five stages of grief. The entire plot is shaped by apocalyptic cataclysm coming on the fourth day. Is the game a metaphor for death, or even Link's DyingDream? Or is it just a tale of a wanderer, in a far-off land, trying to do the best he can?
* ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'', especially ''Brawl''.
** It's either a fighting game which stars as many Creator/{{Nintendo}} characters as possible (and a few 3rd-party guests), or it's one of the most interactive and wacky cartoons of all time.
** Alternatively, it's the story of a boy growing up and having to put his toys away.
* Nintendo called ''VideoGame/MetroidPrime'' a first-person adventure to specifically break up the "Is it a first person shooter, or an adventure game done in first person?" arguments that surrounded its launch. The exact same thing was done with ''VideoGame/{{Geist}}'', another game that can be interpreted as a First Person Shooter or an adventure game done in first person.
* ''VideoGame/{{Persona 4}}'':
** [[spoiler:Naoto]] is intended to be seen as someone struggling [[spoiler:in a male dominated work environment]], but many Western fans see [[spoiler:her]] to be {{Transgender}}.
** Shadow Kanji's [[CampGay effeminate behavior]] is supposed to represent Kanji's interest in things that aren't considered masculine, but its led Western fans to wonder if he's actually a [[ArmoredClosetGay closet homosexual]].
* ''VideoGame/{{Persona 5}}'' features societal problems that are shown from a primarily Japanese point of view, but that have also resonated with millennial players overseas: systematic corruption, the older generation not having any concern for the well being of young people today, and the fact that anyone with enough money, influence, and fame is essentially above the law.
* [[spoiler:Chihiro Fujisaki]] from ''VisualNovel/DanganRonpa'' tends to be seen by Western fans as {{transgender}}, but [[spoiler:his backstory is intended to address the issues of bullying and strict enforcement of gender roles in Japan, since Chihiro was ruthlessly bullied for his frail and unmanly physique and crossdresses to avoid the ridicule]].
* ''VideoGame/YumeNikki'' is a game built around this. Is it an [[AmbiguousSituation ambiguous]] character study? An {{allegory}} for Japan's social problems? A simple WideOpenSandbox [[MST3KMantra that isn't supposed to be analyzed deeply]]? [[WordOfGod Kikiyama's official website]] suggests [[spoiler:the latter]], but its lack of plot and [[RuleOfSymbolism abundant symbolism]] [[DeathOfTheAuthor make fans think otherwise]].

[[folder:Western Animation]]
* ''WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender'' and ''WesternAnimation/TheLegendOfKorra'', much like ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings'', have many historical inspirations without ever falling into straight allegories of any particular events.
* ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'' has loads of this. Many of the plots and characters are ambiguous enough that multiple interpretations can be made. Bubblegum and Marceline's relationship can be viewed as two former lovers who had a nasty break up or as two friends who had a falling out. "All The Little People" can be viewed as an affectionate jab at {{Shipping}}, a parody of the creative process, or a metaphor for puberty all at the same time. A lot of things about the show just depend on the viewers personal interpretation.
* In ''WesternAnimation/StevenUniverse,'' Gems can perform a FusionDance to become a new individual. WordOfGod describes this as "the space between people becoming its own character," and has been used to represent [[ThePowerOfLove romance]], [[ThePowerOfFriendship friendship]], mutually abusive relationships, [[BodyHorror a horrific war crime committed by the villains]] and [[MundaneUtility sheer utility]] over the course of the series.