Main Tropes Index

Troperville

Editing Help

Tools

Toys

Narrative

Genre

Media

Topical Tropes

Other Categories

Custom Search
They Just Didn't Care Discussion
Krid: I'm going to go through and cull natter and chaff, and I'll post my decision and reasoning for each item. If you wish to contest it, do so just under the entry in question.

  • Saban Moon: If the person presenting it says "Please have an open mind", it's because they're expecting a backlash. Also, I have to agree that it doesn't need the Sailor Moon tie-in to be terrible on it's own. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B4_VCeHfjo
    • Result: Kept.

  • Samurai X: Although it has plenty of errors and screw-ups, I can't verify the claim about Nobuhiro Watsuki's beliefs. The example is at the bottom of this page if you can find proof.
    • Result: Deleted.

  • Negima: Yes, they basically went-off perpendicular to the plot of the manga. This example does a good job showing how a work can still be GOOD without being at all accurate to the source material.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Si N: I can confirm that John Blade has a strong aversion to murder, what with him being a super-cop and all that.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Lensman: Horribly screwing up the focus of a series (The lenses) is evidence enough. The breeding project, while important, is not vital enough to qualify on it's own.
    • Result: Kept, with edits.

  • Batman: Ever since the middle of the golden ages Batman has refused to use firearms, but he DOES have a long history of intentionally letting people die. Heck, he explicitly offered to let Gordon execute the Joker over what the Joker had done to his daughter. However, Batman And Robin was a poorly written travesty. How the hell did Batman manage to adopt an +18-year-old, anyway?
    • Result: Partially kept.

  • Starship Troopers: The story provided is roughly accurate.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Uwe Boll: This man is reviled among gamers for his ability to corrupt everything he touches. Rumor has it that Gabe Newell threatened to shoot Uwe Boll if he so much as contemplated Half Life movie. Some game developers But don't take MY word for it, just ask any critic who has ever watched his films. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/uwe_boll/
    • Result: Kept, but edited.

  • The Dark Is Rising: I can't find much to support either side of this. If I could find plot synopsies then it would be different, but I can't keep it as it is. The example's at the bottom of this page.
    • Result: Deleted.

  • His Dark Materials: Support provided in the example.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Field Of Dreams: At best this is a minor detail, and the example itself says it doesn't count.
    • Result: Deleted.

  • The Scarlet Letter: She admitted that she didn't care, and the result was a mangled version of the book.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Jumper: The author was working alongside the production crew, and approved of the final work. I'm going to give the author the benefit of a doubt and assume they shared a few beliefs with Douglas Adams on changing media and revisions.
    • Result: Deleted.

  • Incredible Hulk: While the movie was passable, it wasn't very kind to the source material. The fact that they decided to try again almost immediately kinda suggests that they knew they screwed up.
    • Result: Kept, with a rewrite.

  • Lawnmower Man: The name DOES appear to be the only real link between the movie and the book.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Super Mario Bros: I actually enjoyed this movie quite a bit, but it's ties to the series are basically just a series of shout-outs.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Bewitched: "Um, also, the whole point of the Bewitched film is that it doesn't take place in the Bewitched TV universe. Because in the movie Bewitched is a FICTIONAL TV SHOW. The whole plot is that Nicole Kidman is a "real" witch trying out for the "fictional" part of the "fictional" witch Samantha in Will Ferrell's TV remake."
    • Result: Deleted.

  • Eragon: It diverged enough to make kids cry. I actually saw a news segment about how kids had responded so negatively to the movie, and while scant few tears were actually shed the kids were CERTAINLY not pleased. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/30956
    • Result: Kept.

  • Godzilla: Godzilla has always had two major themes. 1: "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of man", 2: Camp. Lots and lots of camp. If you did a deadpan version of MS T3k or Rocky Horror Picture Show, it would be terrible. In the US movie they glossed over Godzilla's origins and played it deadpan. Because of this it was just another generic Attack Of The Fifty Foot Whatever movie, and didn't feel at all like a Godzilla movie.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Catwoman: The anecdote is accurate as near as I can tell, and the fact that it's a credible explanation should be proof enough anyway.
    • Result: Kept

  • Discworld: Yea, that's about how things went down. Although it never made it past talks, it's pretty clear what would have happened if it had continued.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Porn Titles: Porn isn't expected to be good, and there's a reason why nobody sues them over IP violations.
    • Result: Deleted.

  • The Spirit: I'm going to hold off on judgement on this one since I lack the knowledge to make a determination. However, since the changes listed appear to be major I've culled the natter and left it in a cleaner form.
    • Result: Tentatively kept.

  • A Sound Of Thunder: I saw that movie. It was terrible, made no sense, and had terminally large holes in both it's plot and logic.
    • Result: Kept.

  • The Wicker Man: The location, relationship, and personality changes aside, you can't remake a musical without songs.
    • Result: Kept.

  • Ella Enchanted: I don't have the in-depth knowledge needed to re-write this one, but Disney is notorious for ruining books.
    • Result: Tentatively kept


Sordid: Maybe I'm being dense here, but could somebody please explain to me why exactly there are no examples on the page and all the ones that used to be there are stuck in here?

fleb: Someone put it on the cutlist, only they didn't cutlist this ptitle page, they cutlist the redirect They Just Didnt Care. So the big conversation happened on They Just Didnt Care Discussion, instead of here, about how the examples had become nothing but a pointless bitchfest requiring little to no justification for adding an example. It's like The Untwist: It's a useful definition, but mere mortals just can't be trusted to manage an example list sensibly.
  • Committee of Pawns: A backroom yet binding conversation sounds like something that other WIKI would do, isn’t this TV Tropes?

Sordid: I see, it is as I suspected. Too bad, I had a wonderful Need for Speed example all thought up. But yeah, this backroom business is unbecoming. Perhaps a compromise, in the form of a separate example page, so as not to clutter up the article, and with a proper disclaimer at the top?

Krid: Put that example up. I refuse to abide by background dealings and the arbitrary demands of self-important blowhards. The probllem is not with the article OR the examples, but with the fact that nobody has bothered to act as editor. It seems that backroom comitties much preffer to nuke and pave instead of puting forth some actual effort. : I've revised the first few sections already. Take a look at those and tell me if you think it's 'unsalvagable'. ^^


Charred Knight: Removed mention of the Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance series since they where a critical success, and considering that they where making a third one when Black Isle Studio closed a financial success as well. Also their seems to be some confusion about who made Dark Alliance, as Interplay itself is blamed when Black Isle Studio itself made the second one, and produced the first one. The complaints about DA are either minor, or based solely on They Changed it now it sucks since DA isn't an RPG, like the original Baldur's Gate. Its the eqivalent of someone bitching about Mario Kart since its a racing game and not a platformer.

Krid: Removed the following:
  • About the religious fanatics blowing planets up? Microsoft/FASA Studios didn't invent that; it's Classic Battle Tech canon.
Krid: Reason? Well... it's just not true. The Wobbies may be fanatical, but (circa 2002, when the game was released) they abided by the terms of the Ares Convention. Aside from that, not even the SLDF had the technological capability to destroy a planet. As far back as I can remember, BT has based itself on actual science excepting situations where deviations are absolutely required for the sake of the setting (Mostly just jump drives and FTL communications).

The Defenestrator: And... Mechs.

Korval: I removed the negative, in-text reference to the Jihad. While Classic Battle Tech ca. 2002 had not yet entered the Jihad era, the Jihad had been planned by FASA for years before FASA closed (they laid out innumerable hints of it), and Mechwarrior: Dark Age had already started exploiting the post-Jihad era. The latter made the Jihad absolute firm Battle Tech canon (history of Dark Age, future of CBT) when Mech Assault was released. Unless there are specific instances of Mech Assault actually doing something with the Jihad that Battle Tech canon actively says didn't happen (the Wo B canonically have ruined several planets, making them unfit for human life, but they have not actively obliterated any planets themselves), the comment simply isn't true.


Maybe I'm being dense, but what's wrong with the image on the Stargate: Infinity cover? It shows the gate having eight chevrons, as it should. The image is tremendously, perhaps excessively, simplified, but I fail to see anything terribly inaccurate about it.

Krid: The first thing I noticed was that it was acting like an intragalactic window instead of the water-ish-looking event horizon we all know and love.

furbearingbrick: I agree, that example was a bit narrow. Replaced by an example that's more obvious (the god-forsaken Star Trek comics.)

Some Guy: That picture always bugged me, but then again, Jonas Quinn has always bugged me, too, so I got kind of used to irrational Stargate references on the site. Kudos on the new image. That's Super Dickery quality nonsense you got there.
Man Without A Body: I removed the Beowulf example, because, although admittedly there was some Adaptation Decay, it's pretty clear that they really did care.
Removed the example about the fourth season of GX from the list; this is about bad adoptions, not bad seasons.
I question the validity the Dragonball: Evolution entry as it seems to be more of a case of They Changed It Now It Sucks and does not list any discrete examples. It might be prudent to wait until the film is released. I would suggest the original author of the entry justify it, or I will remove it.

KJMackley: I agree. Even though there is more justification to the entry, the simple fact is that the movie isn't out yet. I would laugh so hard if the movie comes out and is actually enjoyable, capturing the goofy tone on the franchise. And the Kame Kame Ha was a audio illusion, a "whoosh" sound was placed on the "Hame" making it sound different.

//Much Later— I took it out. I don't want to seem like an apologist for the movie (I don't think it looks perfect either) but the simple fact is the movie is not out yet. It says in this trope that you need to read and understand They Changed It Now It Sucks before adding an example. All anyone has right now is a couple of trailers and a knee-jerk reaction. If the movie comes out and nobody likes it, then I doubt anyone would have a problem with it being listed.
Removed the entry under the "Kindred: The Embraced" example. Seemed to be trollish, what with the entry using the "get out of your parents' basement" argument.
    Former examples: 
[[/folder]]
Cliche: Okay, so why do people object to giving this page the boot? 04/21/2008

Rogue 7: Because while it's probably better off without examples, it's definitely a real phenomenon. You look at Dragonball Evolution and tell me that they cared about the source material at all.
Sharm Hedgehog: I believe I do remember Nobuhiro Watsuki saying that he preferred Shonen manga to have happy endings. It's from when Kenshin thought Kaoru died, and she wasn't, but Enishi was playing a mind game, Watsuki said that although that would've been dramatic, it's better for shonen manga to end happily instead of depressingly. The manga volume was either volume 23 or 24.

Charred Knight: It's volume 24, and I have it here right with me

To be honest if I had put the theme as my first priority, I should have killed Kaoru. The theme would be more apparent, and the story layout would be simplified, bringing a cleaner wrap-up to the plot. In truth, up until the Jinchuu episodes, I was split 50/50 on whether or not to kill her, and was thinking so hard I got a fever.

But after finishing the Kyoto episode, I thought "The basics of a shonen manga are smiles and a happy ending." If Kaoru died, there would be no clear happy end, and so I chose this storyline.

Since I just supplied the quote I am putting it back
Charred Knight: I deleted two entries (Incredible Hulk, and Guidebook to the galaxy) because they where more Adaptation Decay since they generally do seem to have tried to be great movies. I deleted one that was So Bad Its Horrible, and I deleted one because not only did they not write the entry the right way but it just uses the title.


Master Ghandalf: Deleted the new Star Trek movie because it was deliberately set up as an alternate continuity, as is explained quite clearly by both Spocks in-film. Things didn't happen differently from the original continuity because of laziness or apathy, but because that was the point. It was hardly the first reboot of a long-running franchise, and certainly the only one I can think of that deliberately tied itself into the original continuity. And Kirk is hardly the first character to be played by two actors who look different.


Seed: Most, if not all of the Harry Potter movie entries are arguably Adaptation Decay or, it seems, an Unpleasable Fanbase. Case in point: the directors of the first, third, and fifth films are accused of "not caring" that scenes that were cut from those movies were important clues for the last book. A book that would not be written until years after those movies came out, the details of which were kept top secret by the author, and about which the directors had no way of knowing. I'm deleting them.


Deleted the entry on Samurai Pizza Cats. As the TV Tropes entry explains, the series is well-known for making the best of a bad situation, to the point where the original creators prefer the American dub. It's not really a case of someone Not Caring, and more a case of Saban getting caught by early 90s cultural gaps.


Crowbar: I feel that the entry on Samurai Champloo should be removed. This trope is either about poor quality in the work itself or a poor attempt at adaptation (or both), neither of which apply to Champloo.