Main Tropes Index

Troperville

Editing Help

Tools

Toys

Narrative

Genre

Media

Topical Tropes

Other Categories

Custom Search

"History, a record of things left behind by past generations, started in 1815. Thus we should try to view historical times as the behind of the present. This gives incite into the anals of the past. From the secondary sources we are given hindsight into the future. Hindsight, after all, is caused by lack of foresight."
Non Campus Mentis, The History of the World According to College Students

Bluto: Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
Otter: Germans?
Boon: Forget it, he's rolling.

Ah yes, history, written by the victors, with all the eyewitnesses lost to time... Some say it's one of those mysteries that man cannot know... That in the end, all known history is subjective and therefore useless as a source of knowledge...

But they would be WRONG.

We very well know what happened in the past for the most part, and as we all know that history repeats itself, and those who do not know it are bound to repeat the mistakes of the past... but for some reason some people just don't seem to even want to try to understand. Mainly caused by not doing the research properly, especially when a fiction writer bases his history on the works of other fiction writers instead of actual histories.

This trope is for those who try to use history, but their knowledge of history seems to stop some time last week. They think Columbus personally discovered the United States, George Washington cut down a cherry tree, Franklin flew a kite, and that Paul Revere was the only person warning everyone about the British. (Oh, and that no history has ever happened that did not involve the United States in some way.)

Also, many authors commit what's called the "historian's mistake", the idea that historical characters acted and made their decisions with full knowledge of the future — including the repercussions their actions would cause. Although some historical individuals made predictions that came true, this is not the same thing as knowing what would happen. For instance, a character in 1919 could plausibly predict that the Treaty of Versailles would cause hardship, anger and instability in Germany (indeed, Marshal Foch himself said at the time it was "not a peace treaty, just an armistice for twenty years" — though that was because he thought it didn't crush Germany enough), but it would be stretching it for him to confidently assert that the instability would specifically result in the murders of millions of Jews, Roma, and others.

This trope is NOT for speculative history stories, which get a pass simply because they're supposed to be Alternate Continuity stories, unless they reference these events as parts of "actual" history.

Compare Hollywood History, where the facts are mostly right, just caricatured and stereotyped, when not subject to Nostalgia Filter. See History Marches On for those rare cases where new evidence or insight actually does change the historical record.

Examples

    open/close all folders 

     Film 

     Literature 

     Live Action TV 

     Newspaper Comics 

     Tabletop Games 

     Theater 

     Translation 

     Web Original 

     Western Animation 

     Video Games 

     Fan Fic 

Video Game GeographyYou Fail Indexes ForeverPolitically Correct History