|
Narrative
|
alt title(s): Only One Discussion (moved from Only One Discussion on 14-Aug-2008)
Sci Vo: "The Only One" would make much more sense. I can't believe that it was originally created as "Only One", and I can't believe that someone would deliberately change it to that later. Logically, it must've been gremlins.
HeartBurn Kid: Yes, but around here, we hate the word "the".
Sci Vo: Yes, and we (and by "we" I mean "I") hate acronyms, but I don't go around changing them all willy-nilly, because sometimes they're actually appropriate. "Only One" and "The Only One" have different meanings, and right now, the name doesn't match the trope.
Big T: Your argument might have more impact if you explained the difference in meanings. We've kept some with The at the beginning, if we can find a reason. Also, your comparison falls flat, since there is no indication that this article was ever called by another name, and especially that it was changed "willy-nilly".
Eric DVH: What the dinglebears!? How does Stargate SG 1 fall into this trope? Sure the S.G.C. is short on manpower compared with the rest of our military (and, of course, those of its numerous interstellar foes), but SG-1 seems about as effective as any other unit of the S.G.C. (or even its allies, such as the To'kra and Free Jaffa). About the only way this trope might fit is the way how a few thousand puny Taurii seem to be the only catalyst capable of bringing three or four whole stagnant galaxies worth of aons-old evil empires to heel in a matter of years. Big T: Isn't it amazing how, if you ramble on long enough, you'll answer your own question? Obviously, it is humanity itself that functions as the Only Ones in Stargate SG-1. It took the Tau'ri to do what no one else could. We beat the Goa'uld and the Ori, something more advanced aliens including our Neglectful Precursors never figured out how to do. Kizor: Could someone with the attention span please trim this down to an actual, one-*-only example instead of a discussion and put it back in? Video Games
|
